中国医药科学
中國醫藥科學
중국의약과학
CHINA MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2014年
17期
163-165
,共3页
持续腰大池引流%鞘内注射%颅内感染%重要性
持續腰大池引流%鞘內註射%顱內感染%重要性
지속요대지인류%초내주사%로내감염%중요성
Continued lumbar drainage%Intrathecal injection%Intracranial infection%Importance
目的：探讨持续腰大池引流治疗联合鞘内注射在颅内感染治疗中的临床疗效。方法选取2011年2月～2013年6月我院接收的100例术后颅内感染患者为研究对象，随机分成实验组与对照组，各50例。实验组患者实施持续腰大池引流联合鞘内注射治疗，对照组仅给予持续腰大池引流治疗，比较两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果实验组患者经治疗后47例（94％）痊愈出院，1例（2％）转院治疗，2例（4％）死亡，治愈率为94.0％，较对照组78.0％有明显提高，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论持续腰大池引流治疗联合鞘内注射用于颅内感染治疗可有效控制和治疗术后颅内感染，治愈率高，有效降低患者的死亡率和致残率，临床疗效显著，且操作简单、安全、有效，患者疼痛较小，是临床治疗神经外科手术术后颅内感染的有效方法之一，值得在临床推广。
目的：探討持續腰大池引流治療聯閤鞘內註射在顱內感染治療中的臨床療效。方法選取2011年2月～2013年6月我院接收的100例術後顱內感染患者為研究對象，隨機分成實驗組與對照組，各50例。實驗組患者實施持續腰大池引流聯閤鞘內註射治療，對照組僅給予持續腰大池引流治療，比較兩組患者的臨床治療效果。結果實驗組患者經治療後47例（94％）痊愈齣院，1例（2％）轉院治療，2例（4％）死亡，治愈率為94.0％，較對照組78.0％有明顯提高，兩組比較差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。結論持續腰大池引流治療聯閤鞘內註射用于顱內感染治療可有效控製和治療術後顱內感染，治愈率高，有效降低患者的死亡率和緻殘率，臨床療效顯著，且操作簡單、安全、有效，患者疼痛較小，是臨床治療神經外科手術術後顱內感染的有效方法之一，值得在臨床推廣。
목적：탐토지속요대지인류치료연합초내주사재로내감염치료중적림상료효。방법선취2011년2월～2013년6월아원접수적100례술후로내감염환자위연구대상，수궤분성실험조여대조조，각50례。실험조환자실시지속요대지인류연합초내주사치료，대조조부급여지속요대지인류치료，비교량조환자적림상치료효과。결과실험조환자경치료후47례（94％）전유출원，1례（2％）전원치료，2례（4％）사망，치유솔위94.0％，교대조조78.0％유명현제고，량조비교차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론지속요대지인류치료연합초내주사용우로내감염치료가유효공제화치료술후로내감염，치유솔고，유효강저환자적사망솔화치잔솔，림상료효현저，차조작간단、안전、유효，환자동통교소，시림상치료신경외과수술술후로내감염적유효방법지일，치득재림상추엄。
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy of continued lumbar drainage therapy combined with intrathecal injection for the treatment of intracranial infection. Methods100 cases of patients treated in our hospital from February 2011 to June 2013 were randomly divided into two groups, the experimental group and the control group, each of 50 cases. Patients in the experimental group were treated with continuous lumbar drainage combined with intrathecal injection therapy and the control group were given continuous lumbar drainage treatment, clinical efficacy were compared between the two groups.Results The experimental group patients after treatment 47 cases (94%%) were cured, 1 case (2%) referral for treatment, 2 cases (4%) died, the cure rate was 94.0%%, compared with 78% of the control group had a significantly improvement. The difference of two group was statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionContinuous lumbar drainage therapy combined with intrathecal injection for the treatment of intracranial infection can effectively control and treat postoperative intracranial infection with high cure rate and reduce mortality and morbidity effectively with significant clinical effect. It's an simple safe, effective operation which patients understand less pain and is one of the effective methods of clinical treatment of intracranial neurosurgery infection which is worthy of promotion.
