CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较乳腺癌患者采用外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管（peripherally inserted central catheter，PICC）和植入式静脉输液港（venous port access，VPA）置管期间并发症的发生率，探讨乳腺癌患者合适的中心静脉输液途径。方法选取2012年1月～2014年1月本院收治的乳腺癌化疗患者409例，将植入VPA的191例设为VPA组，植入PICC的218例设为PICC组，比较两组患者置管期间并发症发生情况。结果 VPA组患者置管期间并发症总发生率低于PICC组患者（P＜0.05）。结论VPA具有安全、舒适的优点，是乳腺癌患者静脉输液的理想途径。
목적：비교유선암환자채용외주정맥천자중심정맥치관（peripherally inserted central catheter，PICC）화식입식정맥수액항（venous port access，VPA）치관기간병발증적발생솔，탐토유선암환자합괄적중심정맥수액도경。방법선취2012년1월～2014년1월본원수치적유선암화료환자409례，장식입VPA적191례설위VPA조，식입PICC적218례설위PICC조，비교량조환자치관기간병발증발생정황。결과 VPA조환자치관기간병발증총발생솔저우PICC조환자（P＜0.05）。결론VPA구유안전、서괄적우점，시유선암환자정맥수액적이상도경。
Objective To compare the effects of peripherally inserted central catheter(PICC)and venous port access (VPA)on the complication incidence of breast cancer.Methods A total of 191 breast cancer patients with VPA and 218 ones with PICC for chemotherapy from January 2012 to January 2014 were involved.The two groups were compared in respect of incidence of complications during intubation.Result The complication incidence in the VPA group was lower than the PICC group(P<0.05). Conclusion VPA is an ideal pathway for intravenous infusion in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.