江西医药
江西醫藥
강서의약
JIANGXI MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
8期
662-664
,共3页
乳腺癌%改良根治术%乳头乳晕复合体%美容效果%前瞻性研究
乳腺癌%改良根治術%乳頭乳暈複閤體%美容效果%前瞻性研究
유선암%개량근치술%유두유훈복합체%미용효과%전첨성연구
Breast cancer%Modified radical mastectomy%Nipple-areolar complex%Cosmetic effect%Prospective study
目的:探讨乳腺癌保留乳头改良根治术的可行性以及美容效果。方法采用前瞻性随机对照研究方法,将2011年1月-2012年10月符合入组标准的40例乳腺癌患者随机分两组,研究组20例行乳腺癌保留乳头改良根治术,对照组20例行乳腺癌改良根治术,比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、并发症、肿瘤复发情况以及术后美容效果。结果两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、并发症比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组20例保留乳头均成活,手术医生对乳房美容效果评价满意率80%(16/20);患者对胸部外形满意度的自我评分研究组明显优于对照组,差异有显著性统计学意义(P<0.01);两组患者随访12-33个月均无复发病例。结论乳腺癌保留乳头改良根治术安全可行,较传统改良根治术具有更佳的美容效果。
目的:探討乳腺癌保留乳頭改良根治術的可行性以及美容效果。方法採用前瞻性隨機對照研究方法,將2011年1月-2012年10月符閤入組標準的40例乳腺癌患者隨機分兩組,研究組20例行乳腺癌保留乳頭改良根治術,對照組20例行乳腺癌改良根治術,比較兩組手術時間、術中齣血量、術後引流量、併髮癥、腫瘤複髮情況以及術後美容效果。結果兩組手術時間、術中齣血量、術後引流量、併髮癥比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);研究組20例保留乳頭均成活,手術醫生對乳房美容效果評價滿意率80%(16/20);患者對胸部外形滿意度的自我評分研究組明顯優于對照組,差異有顯著性統計學意義(P<0.01);兩組患者隨訪12-33箇月均無複髮病例。結論乳腺癌保留乳頭改良根治術安全可行,較傳統改良根治術具有更佳的美容效果。
목적:탐토유선암보류유두개량근치술적가행성이급미용효과。방법채용전첨성수궤대조연구방법,장2011년1월-2012년10월부합입조표준적40례유선암환자수궤분량조,연구조20례행유선암보류유두개량근치술,대조조20례행유선암개량근치술,비교량조수술시간、술중출혈량、술후인류량、병발증、종류복발정황이급술후미용효과。결과량조수술시간、술중출혈량、술후인류량、병발증비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);연구조20례보류유두균성활,수술의생대유방미용효과평개만의솔80%(16/20);환자대흉부외형만의도적자아평분연구조명현우우대조조,차이유현저성통계학의의(P<0.01);량조환자수방12-33개월균무복발병례。결론유선암보류유두개량근치술안전가행,교전통개량근치술구유경가적미용효과。
Objective To explore the feasibility and cosmetic effect of nipple-preserving modified radical mastectomy. Meth-ods By the method of prospective randomized comparison study,from January 2011 to October 2012,40 patients with breast can-cer were randomly divided into two groups,20 cases of study group accepted nipple-preserving modified radical mastectomy, 20 cases of control group accepted modified radical mastectomy. Then compare the two groups’ operative duration,blood loss, postop-erative flow rate,complications,local recurrence rate and cosmetic effect. Results Between the study group and control group,op-erative duration,blood loss,postoperative flow rate and complications of patients were all no statistical significance (P>0.05);Study group of 20 patients nipple preserving were all survived,the satisfaction rate assessed by operation doctors was 80%(16/20);Obvi-ously,compared with the control group,the patients in the study group had better self-assessment of breast shape,the difference was statistical significance(P<0.01). The two groups of patients were followed up for 12 months-33months,neither with any recur-rence case. Conclusion Nipple-preserving modified radical mastectomy is safe and feasible,which has better cosmetic effect than mastectomy.