中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版)
中華口腔醫學研究雜誌(電子版)
중화구강의학연구잡지(전자판)
CHINESE JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH(ELECTRONIC VERSION)
2014年
4期
301-305
,共5页
吴亚霖%罗智斌%庄秀妹%刘芹%王轲%谢馨%邓飞龙
吳亞霖%囉智斌%莊秀妹%劉芹%王軻%謝馨%鄧飛龍
오아림%라지빈%장수매%류근%왕가%사형%산비룡
美学区%单牙种植%平台转换%骨吸收
美學區%單牙種植%平檯轉換%骨吸收
미학구%단아충식%평태전환%골흡수
Esthetic zone%Single-tooth implant%Platform switching%Bone resorption
目的比较平台转换种植体和传统基台连接种植体对上颌美学区单牙种植周围组织的影响。方法随机选择95例(110枚)上颌美学区单牙种植修复患者,其中Ankylos系统(平台转换)47例(54枚种植体),Nobel Replace系统(传统基台连接)48例(56枚种植体)。在患者最终修复后36~62个月进行随访,拍摄X线片及临床检查来记录种植体周围骨组织和牙龈组织的状况,比较两组种植体边缘骨吸收量和周围软组织红色美学指数。利用统计学方法分析所得数据。结果不同连接方式种植修复后种植体周围边缘骨吸收量与红色美学指数具有显著差异,平台转换种植体的骨吸收量明显少于传统基台连接组,红色美学指数也高于传统基台连接。结论平台转换种植体在上颌美学区单牙种植修复相较于传统基台连接种植体能更有效的保留周围骨组织且美学效果较佳。
目的比較平檯轉換種植體和傳統基檯連接種植體對上頜美學區單牙種植週圍組織的影響。方法隨機選擇95例(110枚)上頜美學區單牙種植脩複患者,其中Ankylos繫統(平檯轉換)47例(54枚種植體),Nobel Replace繫統(傳統基檯連接)48例(56枚種植體)。在患者最終脩複後36~62箇月進行隨訪,拍攝X線片及臨床檢查來記錄種植體週圍骨組織和牙齦組織的狀況,比較兩組種植體邊緣骨吸收量和週圍軟組織紅色美學指數。利用統計學方法分析所得數據。結果不同連接方式種植脩複後種植體週圍邊緣骨吸收量與紅色美學指數具有顯著差異,平檯轉換種植體的骨吸收量明顯少于傳統基檯連接組,紅色美學指數也高于傳統基檯連接。結論平檯轉換種植體在上頜美學區單牙種植脩複相較于傳統基檯連接種植體能更有效的保留週圍骨組織且美學效果較佳。
목적비교평태전환충식체화전통기태련접충식체대상합미학구단아충식주위조직적영향。방법수궤선택95례(110매)상합미학구단아충식수복환자,기중Ankylos계통(평태전환)47례(54매충식체),Nobel Replace계통(전통기태련접)48례(56매충식체)。재환자최종수복후36~62개월진행수방,박섭X선편급림상검사래기록충식체주위골조직화아간조직적상황,비교량조충식체변연골흡수량화주위연조직홍색미학지수。이용통계학방법분석소득수거。결과불동련접방식충식수복후충식체주위변연골흡수량여홍색미학지수구유현저차이,평태전환충식체적골흡수량명현소우전통기태련접조,홍색미학지수야고우전통기태련접。결론평태전환충식체재상합미학구단아충식수복상교우전통기태련접충식체능경유효적보류주위골조직차미학효과교가。
Objective The purpose of this study is to compare peri-implant tissues outcomes of single-tooth implants using platform switching and platform butt-joint placed into maxillary esthetics area . Methods One hundred and ten single-tooth implants were placed into the maxillary aesthetic area of 95 patients selected randomly; 54 implants of 47 patients were using Ankylos system (platform switching); and 56 implants of 48 patients were using Nobel Replace system (butt-joint). All the patients had a follow-up of 36 to 62 months after the implant restoration . Radiographic and clinical examinations were made at the time of the final crowns delivery and the subsequent following-up month . The peri-implant bone resorption and the index of Red Aesthetic Standard were evaluated , respectively. Results There were significant differences in bone resorption and red aesthetic index between the two groups after implant restoration. Bone resorption around implants using platform switching was significantly less than that using platform butt-joint , and aesthetic index of the former group was higher than the later one. Conclusion Dental implants using platform switching placed into the maxillary esthetic area were able to preserve better marginal bone and acquired better aesthetic effect .