临床骨科杂志
臨床骨科雜誌
림상골과잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS
2014年
4期
390-392,395
,共4页
付能高%张志明%何江涛%张映波%蒋成
付能高%張誌明%何江濤%張映波%蔣成
부능고%장지명%하강도%장영파%장성
负压封闭引流%胸腰椎病变%切口感染
負壓封閉引流%胸腰椎病變%切口感染
부압봉폐인류%흉요추병변%절구감염
vacuum sealing drainage%thoracolumbar vertebral body disease%infection of incisional wound
目的:观察负压封闭引流( VSD)治疗胸腰椎病变术后切口感染的临床疗效。方法对54例胸腰椎病变术后切口感染患者分别采用置管冲洗引流(对照组,23例)和VSD( VSD组,31例)治疗。比较两组抗生素应用时间、创口局部治疗时间、引流管阻塞情况,创口愈合情况,观察VSD副反应,评估VSD的疗效。结果54例患者均获随访,时间6~15个月。抗生素应用时间:对照组(20.1±5.6)d,VSD组(14.1±2.1)d;创口局部治疗时间:对照组(25.2±6.2)d,VSD组(15.0±4.6)d;引流管阻塞次数:对照组13次(13/33),VSD组11次(11/81);创口愈合情况:对照组15例(15/23),VSD组29例(29/31)。两组上述指标比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 VSD组出现皮肤发红、发痒5例,皮疹3例。结论 VSD治疗胸腰椎病变术后切口感染能缩短感染伤口治疗时间,促进创口愈合。
目的:觀察負壓封閉引流( VSD)治療胸腰椎病變術後切口感染的臨床療效。方法對54例胸腰椎病變術後切口感染患者分彆採用置管遲洗引流(對照組,23例)和VSD( VSD組,31例)治療。比較兩組抗生素應用時間、創口跼部治療時間、引流管阻塞情況,創口愈閤情況,觀察VSD副反應,評估VSD的療效。結果54例患者均穫隨訪,時間6~15箇月。抗生素應用時間:對照組(20.1±5.6)d,VSD組(14.1±2.1)d;創口跼部治療時間:對照組(25.2±6.2)d,VSD組(15.0±4.6)d;引流管阻塞次數:對照組13次(13/33),VSD組11次(11/81);創口愈閤情況:對照組15例(15/23),VSD組29例(29/31)。兩組上述指標比較差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。 VSD組齣現皮膚髮紅、髮癢5例,皮疹3例。結論 VSD治療胸腰椎病變術後切口感染能縮短感染傷口治療時間,促進創口愈閤。
목적:관찰부압봉폐인류( VSD)치료흉요추병변술후절구감염적림상료효。방법대54례흉요추병변술후절구감염환자분별채용치관충세인류(대조조,23례)화VSD( VSD조,31례)치료。비교량조항생소응용시간、창구국부치료시간、인류관조새정황,창구유합정황,관찰VSD부반응,평고VSD적료효。결과54례환자균획수방,시간6~15개월。항생소응용시간:대조조(20.1±5.6)d,VSD조(14.1±2.1)d;창구국부치료시간:대조조(25.2±6.2)d,VSD조(15.0±4.6)d;인류관조새차수:대조조13차(13/33),VSD조11차(11/81);창구유합정황:대조조15례(15/23),VSD조29례(29/31)。량조상술지표비교차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。 VSD조출현피부발홍、발양5례,피진3례。결론 VSD치료흉요추병변술후절구감염능축단감염상구치료시간,촉진창구유합。
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage ( VSD) in the treatment of postop-erative wound infection of thoracolumbar vertebral body disease. Methods 54 cases with postoperative incisional in-fection of thoracic lumbar spine surgery were respectively treated by irrigation-suction(control group,23cases)and VSD(VSD group,31cases). The antibiotics applying time, the wound treatment time, drainage tube blockage situa-tion, the wound healing situation, VSD side reaction and other indexes were compared and retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the efficacy of VSD. Results 54 cases were followed up for 6~15 months. The antibiotics treatment time (20. 1 ± 5. 6)d in control group and(14. 1 ± 2. 1)d in VSD group, the tresis vulnus treatment time(25. 2 ± 6. 2)d in control group and(15. 0 ± 4. 6) d in VSD group, drainage tube blockage 13 times(13/33) in control group and 11 times(11/81)in VSD group, tresis vulnus was healed in 15 cases (15/23) in control group and 29 cases(29/31) in VSD group. These differences had statistical significance ( P <0. 05 ) . VSD group had 5 cases of skin redness and tickle, 3 cases of rash. Conclusions VSD can effectively shorten the wound infection treatment time and promote wound healing in the treatment of postoperative wound infection of thoracolumbar vertebral body disease.