振动与冲击
振動與遲擊
진동여충격
JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK
2014年
18期
90-95
,共6页
轻型钢木混合楼盖%平面内刚度%水平荷载分配%剪切变形
輕型鋼木混閤樓蓋%平麵內剛度%水平荷載分配%剪切變形
경형강목혼합루개%평면내강도%수평하재분배%전절변형
light wood-steel hybrid diaphragm%in-plane stiffness%horizontal load distribution%shear deformation
对4.8 m ×2.8 m轻型钢木混合楼盖平行及垂直于搁栅方向分别进行了水平往复加载拟静力试验研究,得到了其变形特征、破坏模式、强度、平面内刚度、耗能以及延性。结果显示平行及垂直于搁栅加载时,楼盖变形都以剪切变形为主,主要破坏模式都是两加载点以外的面板钉剪断。垂直于搁栅相比平行于搁栅加载具有更高的强度、平面内刚度、更好的耗能性能和延性。另外将这些参数与FEMA273、ASCE 41-06及NSZEE规范建议值作了比较。结果表明楼盖平面内刚度大大低于FEMA273建议值,高于ASCE 41-06及NSZEE,但与ASCE 41-06更接近。楼盖强度及延性均高于这些规范建议值。
對4.8 m ×2.8 m輕型鋼木混閤樓蓋平行及垂直于擱柵方嚮分彆進行瞭水平往複加載擬靜力試驗研究,得到瞭其變形特徵、破壞模式、彊度、平麵內剛度、耗能以及延性。結果顯示平行及垂直于擱柵加載時,樓蓋變形都以剪切變形為主,主要破壞模式都是兩加載點以外的麵闆釘剪斷。垂直于擱柵相比平行于擱柵加載具有更高的彊度、平麵內剛度、更好的耗能性能和延性。另外將這些參數與FEMA273、ASCE 41-06及NSZEE規範建議值作瞭比較。結果錶明樓蓋平麵內剛度大大低于FEMA273建議值,高于ASCE 41-06及NSZEE,但與ASCE 41-06更接近。樓蓋彊度及延性均高于這些規範建議值。
대4.8 m ×2.8 m경형강목혼합루개평행급수직우각책방향분별진행료수평왕복가재의정력시험연구,득도료기변형특정、파배모식、강도、평면내강도、모능이급연성。결과현시평행급수직우각책가재시,루개변형도이전절변형위주,주요파배모식도시량가재점이외적면판정전단。수직우각책상비평행우각책가재구유경고적강도、평면내강도、경호적모능성능화연성。령외장저사삼수여FEMA273、ASCE 41-06급NSZEE규범건의치작료비교。결과표명루개평면내강도대대저우FEMA273건의치,고우ASCE 41-06급NSZEE,단여ASCE 41-06경접근。루개강도급연성균고우저사규범건의치。
Horizontal cyclic pseudo-static tests were conducted, respectively in parallel direction and that perpendicular to the joist direction of a light wood-steel hybrid diaphragm of 4.8 m ×2.8 m,its deformation feature, failure mode,strength,in-plane stiffness,energy dissipation and ductility were obtained.The results showed that when the diaphragm is loaded in the directions parallel or perpendicular to the joist,the shear deformation occupies the majority of the total deformation and the panel nails outside the two loading points cllpped is the main failure mode;moreover, when the diaphragm is loaded in the direction perpendicular to the joist,it possesses higher strength and in-plane stiffness,better energy dissipation performance and ductility;in addition,these parameters are compared with the suggested values of codes FEMA273,ASCE 41-06 and NSZEE,the diaphragm's in-plane stiffness is significantly lower than the the suggested value of FEMA273 but higher than those of ASCE 41-06 and NSZEE,and more close to that of ASCE 41-06;furthermore,its strength and ductility both exceed the recommended values of these codes.