中国现代医生
中國現代醫生
중국현대의생
CHINA MODERN DOCTOR
2014年
23期
68-71
,共4页
冠心病%介入治疗%综合性%护理干预%生活质量
冠心病%介入治療%綜閤性%護理榦預%生活質量
관심병%개입치료%종합성%호리간예%생활질량
Coronary heart disease%Interventional therapy%Comprehensive%Nursing interventions%Quality of life
目的：探讨综合性护理干预对冠心病介入治疗患者心理状态及生活质量的影响。方法选取2009年1月~2014年1月期间在我院行冠心病介入治疗的患者60例,将上述患者随机分成干预组与对照组各30例,对照组患者给予随机对症护理,干预组于介入手术围术期着重实施综合性护理干预措施,比较两组的SAS评分及QOL评分。结果术后3d,干预组和对照组患者的SAS评分均较术前1d及术后1d明显降低,且干预组术后3d的SAS评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05)；出院后3个月,干预组和对照组患者的生理、心理、独立性、社会关系、环境和生活质量总分均较干预前显著提高,且干预组明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论围术期实施综合性护理干预是冠心病患者介入治疗过程的重要组成部分,可以缓解患的紧张、焦虑的心理状态,提高手术成功率,进一步提高患者的生活质量。
目的：探討綜閤性護理榦預對冠心病介入治療患者心理狀態及生活質量的影響。方法選取2009年1月~2014年1月期間在我院行冠心病介入治療的患者60例,將上述患者隨機分成榦預組與對照組各30例,對照組患者給予隨機對癥護理,榦預組于介入手術圍術期著重實施綜閤性護理榦預措施,比較兩組的SAS評分及QOL評分。結果術後3d,榦預組和對照組患者的SAS評分均較術前1d及術後1d明顯降低,且榦預組術後3d的SAS評分明顯低于對照組(P<0.05)；齣院後3箇月,榦預組和對照組患者的生理、心理、獨立性、社會關繫、環境和生活質量總分均較榦預前顯著提高,且榦預組明顯高于對照組(P<0.05)。結論圍術期實施綜閤性護理榦預是冠心病患者介入治療過程的重要組成部分,可以緩解患的緊張、焦慮的心理狀態,提高手術成功率,進一步提高患者的生活質量。
목적：탐토종합성호리간예대관심병개입치료환자심리상태급생활질량적영향。방법선취2009년1월~2014년1월기간재아원행관심병개입치료적환자60례,장상술환자수궤분성간예조여대조조각30례,대조조환자급여수궤대증호리,간예조우개입수술위술기착중실시종합성호리간예조시,비교량조적SAS평분급QOL평분。결과술후3d,간예조화대조조환자적SAS평분균교술전1d급술후1d명현강저,차간예조술후3d적SAS평분명현저우대조조(P<0.05)；출원후3개월,간예조화대조조환자적생리、심리、독립성、사회관계、배경화생활질량총분균교간예전현저제고,차간예조명현고우대조조(P<0.05)。결론위술기실시종합성호리간예시관심병환자개입치료과정적중요조성부분,가이완해환적긴장、초필적심리상태,제고수술성공솔,진일보제고환자적생활질량。
Objective To investigate the effect and impact on mental state and quality of coronary intervention life of patients of comprehensive nursing intervention. Methods From January 2009 to January 2014 in our hospital, 60 pa-tients with coronary heart disease by coronary intervention were randomly divided into intervention group and the con-trol group, each of 30 patients, the control group were randomly given symptomatic treatment, observation group focused on the implementation of integrated perioperative nursing interventions, the SAS score and QOL score were compared. Results After three days, the intervention group and the control group of SAS scores were lower than that in one day before and after surgery, and the SAS score of intervention group after three days was significantly lower than the con-trol group (P<0.05); After 3 months of discharge, physiological, psychological, independence, social relationships, envi-ronment and quality of life scores in intervention group and the control group were significantly improved than before the intervention, and the intervention group were significantly higher than the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Im-plementation of comprehensive perioperative nursing intervention is an important part of the process of intervention in patients with coronary artery disease, patients can ease tension, anxiety mental state, improve the success rate of surgery and can further improve the quality of life of patients.
