中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2013年
9期
838-840
,共3页
大学生%认知风格%情绪记忆%偏好
大學生%認知風格%情緒記憶%偏好
대학생%인지풍격%정서기억%편호
Undergraduates%Cognitive Style%Emotional Memory%Bias
目的 探讨不同认知风格的大学生对不同效价的情绪记忆偏好,为临床调适认知偏差的个案提供理论借鉴和参考.方法 运用镶嵌图形对大学生的认知风格进行筛查,根据测验结果筛选出最高分(109～73分)和最低分(50～5分)的被试各25名,分别为场独立性和场依存性组,运用学习-再认实验范式,让被试对不同情绪效价的面孔进行学习和再认,分析被试的反应时和正确率.结果 不同认知风格的大学生对情绪面孔再认的正确率和反应时不同,场独立性的个体偏好于再认正性[(610.71±11.26)ms]和中性[(606.24±18.27) ms]的表情,而对负性[(653.17±20.91)ms]表情的再认速度减慢,场依存性的个体更偏好于再认中性表情[(675.67±21.01)ms],差异有显著性(P＜0.05).结论 大学生的认知风格对情绪记忆具有一定的偏好性.
目的 探討不同認知風格的大學生對不同效價的情緒記憶偏好,為臨床調適認知偏差的箇案提供理論藉鑒和參攷.方法 運用鑲嵌圖形對大學生的認知風格進行篩查,根據測驗結果篩選齣最高分(109～73分)和最低分(50～5分)的被試各25名,分彆為場獨立性和場依存性組,運用學習-再認實驗範式,讓被試對不同情緒效價的麵孔進行學習和再認,分析被試的反應時和正確率.結果 不同認知風格的大學生對情緒麵孔再認的正確率和反應時不同,場獨立性的箇體偏好于再認正性[(610.71±11.26)ms]和中性[(606.24±18.27) ms]的錶情,而對負性[(653.17±20.91)ms]錶情的再認速度減慢,場依存性的箇體更偏好于再認中性錶情[(675.67±21.01)ms],差異有顯著性(P＜0.05).結論 大學生的認知風格對情緒記憶具有一定的偏好性.
목적 탐토불동인지풍격적대학생대불동효개적정서기억편호,위림상조괄인지편차적개안제공이론차감화삼고.방법 운용양감도형대대학생적인지풍격진행사사,근거측험결과사선출최고분(109～73분)화최저분(50～5분)적피시각25명,분별위장독립성화장의존성조,운용학습-재인실험범식,양피시대불동정서효개적면공진행학습화재인,분석피시적반응시화정학솔.결과 불동인지풍격적대학생대정서면공재인적정학솔화반응시불동,장독립성적개체편호우재인정성[(610.71±11.26)ms]화중성[(606.24±18.27) ms]적표정,이대부성[(653.17±20.91)ms]표정적재인속도감만,장의존성적개체경편호우재인중성표정[(675.67±21.01)ms],차이유현저성(P＜0.05).결론 대학생적인지풍격대정서기억구유일정적편호성.
Objective To explore the preference of emotional memory in different cognitive style of undergraduates.Methods A 2 cognitive style (field independent style / field dependent style) * 3 facial expressions (positive/neutral/negative faces) mixed designs were adopted to compare the reaction time,which in the condition of stimuli presentation time 500 ms in field independent and dependent participants (n =25,respectively).E-Prime program was used to present the stimulus and to record the reaction time and accuracy to stimuli of all subjects.Repeated Measurement ANOVA was used in the research,facial expressions (positive/neutral/negative faces) as the within group factor,and groups (stress/non stress) as between group factor.Both the main effect of each variable and the interaction effect of variables were tested.Results There were a significant difference of response time and accuracy between the field independent and field dependent college students.It was shown by repeated measurement A NOVA that the main effect(F(2,47) =4.321,P＜ 0.05)in facial expressions properties and the interaction effect(F(2.47) =3.299,P＜ 0.05)between groups and facial expressions properties were found.Further analysis showed that the reaction time to detect stimulus of positive((610.71 ± 11.26)ms)and neutral ((606.24 ± 18.27) ms) facial expression was shorter than negative ((653.17 ± 20.91) ms) faces for field independent participants (P＜0.05).Interestingly,for field dependent group,the neutral faces ((675.67 ± 21.01) ms)were faster than others (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Field independent students had significant advantages over field dependent students in emotional memory.
