脊柱外科杂志
脊柱外科雜誌
척주외과잡지
JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY
2014年
4期
222-225
,共4页
赵长清%丁育健%张凯%孙伟%李华%赵杰
趙長清%丁育健%張凱%孫偉%李華%趙傑
조장청%정육건%장개%손위%리화%조걸
颈椎%寰枕关节%椎管%脊髓压迫症%放射测量术
頸椎%寰枕關節%椎管%脊髓壓迫癥%放射測量術
경추%환침관절%추관%척수압박증%방사측량술
Cervical vertebrae%Atlanto-axial joint%Spinal canal%Spinal cord compression%Radiometry
目的:测量斜坡椎管角在不同骨科患者群的数值范围,分析X线及CT矢状位重建法测量斜坡椎管角的一致性,并探讨斜坡椎管角的测量对枕颈融合术的临床意义。方法纳入189例无上颈髓压迫症患者和37例枕颈部序列异常合并上颈髓压迫症患者,测量颈椎中立位和过屈、过伸位侧位X线片上斜坡椎管角的数值。随机选取有或无上颈髓压迫症患者各10例的颈椎中立位X线和CT正中矢状重建图像,由2位测量者重复测量斜坡椎管角并计算组内相关系数。结果无上颈髓压迫症状者过屈位、中立位和过伸位的斜坡椎管角均显著大于枕颈部序列异常合并上颈髓压迫症患者(P<0.01);前者斜坡椎管角数值的变化范围为23.87°±10.23°,后者为19.10°±7.96°(P<0.01);说明后者的枕颈复合体较前者僵硬并处于异常屈曲位。 X线法测量斜坡椎管角的观察者之间组内相关系数为0.619,低于CT重建法的相应值0.897;X线法的观察者组内相关系数在观察者1和观察者2分别为0.635和0.657,也低于CT重建法的相应值0.937和0.924;CT重建法较X线法具有更好的一致性。结论本研究得出了不同骨科患者群斜坡椎管角的数值范围,为枕颈融合术患者的体位摆放和枕颈部固定融合角度的选择提供了理论依据,并为术中准确测量斜坡椎管角提供了具体方法。
目的:測量斜坡椎管角在不同骨科患者群的數值範圍,分析X線及CT矢狀位重建法測量斜坡椎管角的一緻性,併探討斜坡椎管角的測量對枕頸融閤術的臨床意義。方法納入189例無上頸髓壓迫癥患者和37例枕頸部序列異常閤併上頸髓壓迫癥患者,測量頸椎中立位和過屈、過伸位側位X線片上斜坡椎管角的數值。隨機選取有或無上頸髓壓迫癥患者各10例的頸椎中立位X線和CT正中矢狀重建圖像,由2位測量者重複測量斜坡椎管角併計算組內相關繫數。結果無上頸髓壓迫癥狀者過屈位、中立位和過伸位的斜坡椎管角均顯著大于枕頸部序列異常閤併上頸髓壓迫癥患者(P<0.01);前者斜坡椎管角數值的變化範圍為23.87°±10.23°,後者為19.10°±7.96°(P<0.01);說明後者的枕頸複閤體較前者僵硬併處于異常屈麯位。 X線法測量斜坡椎管角的觀察者之間組內相關繫數為0.619,低于CT重建法的相應值0.897;X線法的觀察者組內相關繫數在觀察者1和觀察者2分彆為0.635和0.657,也低于CT重建法的相應值0.937和0.924;CT重建法較X線法具有更好的一緻性。結論本研究得齣瞭不同骨科患者群斜坡椎管角的數值範圍,為枕頸融閤術患者的體位襬放和枕頸部固定融閤角度的選擇提供瞭理論依據,併為術中準確測量斜坡椎管角提供瞭具體方法。
목적:측량사파추관각재불동골과환자군적수치범위,분석X선급CT시상위중건법측량사파추관각적일치성,병탐토사파추관각적측량대침경융합술적림상의의。방법납입189례무상경수압박증환자화37례침경부서렬이상합병상경수압박증환자,측량경추중립위화과굴、과신위측위X선편상사파추관각적수치。수궤선취유혹무상경수압박증환자각10례적경추중립위X선화CT정중시상중건도상,유2위측량자중복측량사파추관각병계산조내상관계수。결과무상경수압박증상자과굴위、중립위화과신위적사파추관각균현저대우침경부서렬이상합병상경수압박증환자(P<0.01);전자사파추관각수치적변화범위위23.87°±10.23°,후자위19.10°±7.96°(P<0.01);설명후자적침경복합체교전자강경병처우이상굴곡위。 X선법측량사파추관각적관찰자지간조내상관계수위0.619,저우CT중건법적상응치0.897;X선법적관찰자조내상관계수재관찰자1화관찰자2분별위0.635화0.657,야저우CT중건법적상응치0.937화0.924;CT중건법교X선법구유경호적일치성。결론본연구득출료불동골과환자군사파추관각적수치범위,위침경융합술환자적체위파방화침경부고정융합각도적선택제공료이론의거,병위술중준학측량사파추관각제공료구체방법。
Objective To compare the intra-observer and inter-observer reliability of X-ray film and CT saggital recon-struction imaging modalities for measuring clivus-canal angle in different patients , and to discuss its clinical relevance for occipitocervical fusion.Methods A totle of 189 orthopedic patients without symptoms related to upper cervical spinal cord compression ( NC group) and 37 patients with malalignment of occipito-atlanto-axial complex and symptoms related to upper cervical spinal cord compression ( MC group) were included in the study .The clivus-canal angle was measured on lateral cer-vical radiographs of neutral and extension-flexion position .Two observers independently measured clivus-canal angle of 10 pa-tients from NC group and 10 patients from MC group using X-ray film and CT saggital reconstruction methods on 2 separate oc-casions , and the intra-observer and inter-observer reliability of the 2 imaging modalities were analyzed .Results The values of clivus-canal angle measured on flexion , neutral and extension position in NC group were significantly higher than that in MC group (P<0.01) respectively.The range of the value change of clivus-canal angle in NC group was 23.87°±10.23°, also significantly higher than that in MC group , which was 19.10°±7.96°(P<0.01).The occipito-atlanto-axial complex of the patients in MC group was more rigid and flexed than in NC group .The inter-observer correlation coefficient for X-ray films and CT saggital reconstruction were 0.619 and 0.897, respectively.The intra-observer correlation coefficient among observer 1 and observer 2 for X-ray films were 0.635 and 0.657, while that for CT saggital reconstruction were 0.937 and 0.924.CT saggital reconstruction could improve the reliability of measuring clivus-canal angle in comparison to X-ray method.Conclu-sion The current study gave the value range of clivus-canal angle in different patient populations , and provided practical evi-dence for patient positioning and determination of fixed angle of occipito -atlanto-axial complex during occipitocervical fusion procedure.