临床肝胆病杂志
臨床肝膽病雜誌
림상간담병잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HEPATOLOGY
2014年
9期
917-920
,共4页
高胜%刘剑勇%张志明%赵荫农%袁卫平%吴飞翔%向邦德
高勝%劉劍勇%張誌明%趙蔭農%袁衛平%吳飛翔%嚮邦德
고성%류검용%장지명%조음농%원위평%오비상%향방덕
癌,肝细胞%化学栓塞,治疗性%肝切除术%Meta分析
癌,肝細胞%化學栓塞,治療性%肝切除術%Meta分析
암,간세포%화학전새,치료성%간절제술%Meta분석
carcinoma,hepatocellular%chemoembolization,therapeutic%hepatectomy%meta-analysis
目的:旨在评价肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)在肝细胞癌(HCC)切除术前应用的疗效。方法计算机检索PubMed、Em-base、Cochrane library、CNKI、VIP、万方数据库,截止日期到2013年3月12日。收集公开发表的关于HCC切除术前TACE治疗与单纯手术治疗比较的随机对照试验,对纳入的文献进行资料提取和质量评价,采用ReMan5.2软件进行统计分析。结果共纳入4个随机对照试验,共342例患者。Meta分析结果显示:术前TACE组与单用手术切除治疗HCC组相比,术后1、3、5年无瘤生存率的相对危险度(RR)[95%可信区间(CI)]分别为1.07(0.92~1.25)(P=0.38)、1.05(0.79~1.41)(P=0.72)、0.95(0.64~1.42)(P=0.81);1、3、5年总生存率的RR(95%CI)分别为1.01(0.92~1.10)(P=0.85)、1.14(0.97~1.34)(P=0.11)、0.95(0.75~1.21)(P=0.68);术后并发症发生率及病死率合并分析其相对危险度的RR(95%CI)分别为0.89(0.45~1.75)(P=0.73)、0.77(0.25~2.37)(P=0.65)。2组的术后1、3、5年无瘤生存率、总生存率及术后并发症发生率及病死率比较差异无统计学意义。结论 HCC术前应用TACE不能提高术后无瘤生存率及总生存率。但是本研究中纳入的文献数及病例数均较少,尚需更多高质量的大样本临床随机对照试验进一步验证。
目的:旨在評價肝動脈化療栓塞術(TACE)在肝細胞癌(HCC)切除術前應用的療效。方法計算機檢索PubMed、Em-base、Cochrane library、CNKI、VIP、萬方數據庫,截止日期到2013年3月12日。收集公開髮錶的關于HCC切除術前TACE治療與單純手術治療比較的隨機對照試驗,對納入的文獻進行資料提取和質量評價,採用ReMan5.2軟件進行統計分析。結果共納入4箇隨機對照試驗,共342例患者。Meta分析結果顯示:術前TACE組與單用手術切除治療HCC組相比,術後1、3、5年無瘤生存率的相對危險度(RR)[95%可信區間(CI)]分彆為1.07(0.92~1.25)(P=0.38)、1.05(0.79~1.41)(P=0.72)、0.95(0.64~1.42)(P=0.81);1、3、5年總生存率的RR(95%CI)分彆為1.01(0.92~1.10)(P=0.85)、1.14(0.97~1.34)(P=0.11)、0.95(0.75~1.21)(P=0.68);術後併髮癥髮生率及病死率閤併分析其相對危險度的RR(95%CI)分彆為0.89(0.45~1.75)(P=0.73)、0.77(0.25~2.37)(P=0.65)。2組的術後1、3、5年無瘤生存率、總生存率及術後併髮癥髮生率及病死率比較差異無統計學意義。結論 HCC術前應用TACE不能提高術後無瘤生存率及總生存率。但是本研究中納入的文獻數及病例數均較少,尚需更多高質量的大樣本臨床隨機對照試驗進一步驗證。
목적:지재평개간동맥화료전새술(TACE)재간세포암(HCC)절제술전응용적료효。방법계산궤검색PubMed、Em-base、Cochrane library、CNKI、VIP、만방수거고,절지일기도2013년3월12일。수집공개발표적관우HCC절제술전TACE치료여단순수술치료비교적수궤대조시험,대납입적문헌진행자료제취화질량평개,채용ReMan5.2연건진행통계분석。결과공납입4개수궤대조시험,공342례환자。Meta분석결과현시:술전TACE조여단용수술절제치료HCC조상비,술후1、3、5년무류생존솔적상대위험도(RR)[95%가신구간(CI)]분별위1.07(0.92~1.25)(P=0.38)、1.05(0.79~1.41)(P=0.72)、0.95(0.64~1.42)(P=0.81);1、3、5년총생존솔적RR(95%CI)분별위1.01(0.92~1.10)(P=0.85)、1.14(0.97~1.34)(P=0.11)、0.95(0.75~1.21)(P=0.68);술후병발증발생솔급병사솔합병분석기상대위험도적RR(95%CI)분별위0.89(0.45~1.75)(P=0.73)、0.77(0.25~2.37)(P=0.65)。2조적술후1、3、5년무류생존솔、총생존솔급술후병발증발생솔급병사솔비교차이무통계학의의。결론 HCC술전응용TACE불능제고술후무류생존솔급총생존솔。단시본연구중납입적문헌수급병례수균교소,상수경다고질량적대양본림상수궤대조시험진일보험증。
Objective To assess the efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE)in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)before hepatectomy.Methods PubMed,Embase,the Cochrane Library,CNKI,VIP,and Wanfang Data were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs)evaluating the efficacy of preoperative TACE plus hepatectomy (study group)versus hepatectomy alone (control group)in HCC patients published up to March 12,2013.The quality of included studies was assessed,and relevant data were ex-tracted.Statistical analysis was performed by RevMan 5.2.Results A total of 4 RCTs involving 342 participants were included.Meta-a-nalysis of data extracted from the included RCTs showed that there were no significant differences between the study group and control group in 1 -,3-,and 5 -year disease-free survival (DFS),with relative risks (RRs)(95% confidence intervals (CIs))of 1.07 (0.92 -1.25)(P=0.38),1.05 (0.79,1.41)(P=0.72),and 0.95 (0.64-1.42)(P=0.81),respectively,in 1 -,3 -,and 5 -year o-verall survival (OS),with RRs (95% CIs)of 1.01 (0.92-1.10)(P=0.85),1.14 (0.97-1.34)(P=0.11),and 0.95 (0.75 -1.21)(P=0.68),respectively,and in rate ofpostoperative complications and mortality,with RRs (95%CIs)of0.89 (0.45 -1.75)(P=0.73)and 0.77 (0.25 -2.37)(P=0.65),respectively.Conclusion TACE before hepatectomy cannot increase DFS and OS and re-duce complications and mortality in HCC patients.However,the numbers of studies and cases included in the analysis are small,and more high-quality,large-sample RCTs are needed to confirm the conclusion.