农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
2014年
16期
213-220
,共8页
袁月明%孙丽丽%潘世强%李喜武%刘海枝%王春野
袁月明%孫麗麗%潘世彊%李喜武%劉海枝%王春野
원월명%손려려%반세강%리희무%류해지%왕춘야
温度%通风%太阳能%附加阳光间%风机%地道通风%地面温度
溫度%通風%太暘能%附加暘光間%風機%地道通風%地麵溫度
온도%통풍%태양능%부가양광간%풍궤%지도통풍%지면온도
temperature%ventilation%solar energy%attached sunspace%fan%tunnel ventilation system%floor temperature
为了调控猪舍地面的温度及降低舍内相对湿度,该文的太阳能猪舍采用了地道通风方式。猪只一天之中70%以上的时间以躺卧休息为主,躺卧区的温度环境,尤其是地面的温度调控极为重要。该文以长春地区的猪舍为研究对象,利用附加阳光间吸收太阳辐射为猪床和猪舍提供热量。在通风道内正压通风、负压通风和无风机的不同工况下,对采用地道通风方式的太阳能猪舍进行试验研究。结果表明:在寒冷季节室外温度大约是-13℃,试验猪舍比对照猪舍的温度平均高3.0℃,相对湿度RH(relative humidity)平均降4%;在试验猪舍中,距离地道进风口2 m的地面,白天通风道正压通风比通风道无风机温度平均高0.7℃,比通风道负压通风的温度平均高1.5℃,晚上正压通风比无风机温度平均高1.1℃,比负压通风的温度平均高2.9℃;距离进风口1 m的地面,白天正压通风比无风机温度平均高3.6℃,比负压通风的温度平均高3.8℃;晚上正压通风比无风机温度平均高6.4℃,比负压通风的温度平均高6.9℃。因此,在太阳能猪舍采用地道通风方式对提高猪舍的地面温度,降低舍内相对湿度具有重要意义。
為瞭調控豬捨地麵的溫度及降低捨內相對濕度,該文的太暘能豬捨採用瞭地道通風方式。豬隻一天之中70%以上的時間以躺臥休息為主,躺臥區的溫度環境,尤其是地麵的溫度調控極為重要。該文以長春地區的豬捨為研究對象,利用附加暘光間吸收太暘輻射為豬床和豬捨提供熱量。在通風道內正壓通風、負壓通風和無風機的不同工況下,對採用地道通風方式的太暘能豬捨進行試驗研究。結果錶明:在寒冷季節室外溫度大約是-13℃,試驗豬捨比對照豬捨的溫度平均高3.0℃,相對濕度RH(relative humidity)平均降4%;在試驗豬捨中,距離地道進風口2 m的地麵,白天通風道正壓通風比通風道無風機溫度平均高0.7℃,比通風道負壓通風的溫度平均高1.5℃,晚上正壓通風比無風機溫度平均高1.1℃,比負壓通風的溫度平均高2.9℃;距離進風口1 m的地麵,白天正壓通風比無風機溫度平均高3.6℃,比負壓通風的溫度平均高3.8℃;晚上正壓通風比無風機溫度平均高6.4℃,比負壓通風的溫度平均高6.9℃。因此,在太暘能豬捨採用地道通風方式對提高豬捨的地麵溫度,降低捨內相對濕度具有重要意義。
위료조공저사지면적온도급강저사내상대습도,해문적태양능저사채용료지도통풍방식。저지일천지중70%이상적시간이당와휴식위주,당와구적온도배경,우기시지면적온도조공겁위중요。해문이장춘지구적저사위연구대상,이용부가양광간흡수태양복사위저상화저사제공열량。재통풍도내정압통풍、부압통풍화무풍궤적불동공황하,대채용지도통풍방식적태양능저사진행시험연구。결과표명:재한랭계절실외온도대약시-13℃,시험저사비대조저사적온도평균고3.0℃,상대습도RH(relative humidity)평균강4%;재시험저사중,거리지도진풍구2 m적지면,백천통풍도정압통풍비통풍도무풍궤온도평균고0.7℃,비통풍도부압통풍적온도평균고1.5℃,만상정압통풍비무풍궤온도평균고1.1℃,비부압통풍적온도평균고2.9℃;거리진풍구1 m적지면,백천정압통풍비무풍궤온도평균고3.6℃,비부압통풍적온도평균고3.8℃;만상정압통풍비무풍궤온도평균고6.4℃,비부압통풍적온도평균고6.9℃。인차,재태양능저사채용지도통풍방식대제고저사적지면온도,강저사내상대습도구유중요의의。
In order to control the ground temperature and relative humidity inside pigpens, the solar piggery with tunnel ventilation was adopted in this study. Pigs usually lay down for more than 70% of the time. The environmental control, especially the temperature control at where they lie down (e.g. floor, bed) is crucial in improving the pigs’ performance. This study took the piggery as the research object, using additional solar radiation for the pig beds between the sun and piggery in Changchun. Information on major structures of both the experimental piggery and the control is listed below. The dimensions are 61 m in length, 8.1 m in width, and 3.42 m in height, and the orientation is facing south. The difference between the experimental piggery and the control is that the experimental piggery is mainly divided into two parts, the extra sunspace and itself, which is separated by a common wall. The common wall is a solid wall with a ventilation window and it is covered with an insulating layer during cold seasons. The extra sunspace is arch-shaped, constructed with lightweight steel, and also is covered with an insulating layer during cold seasons. In the experimental piggery, there are 28 units under the pig beds. Each unit 3 500 mm long and 1 970 mm wide and also has its own independent air intake, outlet, and closed airflow tunnel. The positive pressure ventilation axial airflow fan is installed at the air intake in the experimental piggery. The negative pressure ventilation draught fan is fixed at the air outlet. The floor in the control piggery is composed of a cement mortar slope layer, soil compaction, and cement mortar layer. Both experimental barn and control barn housed 275 growing-finishing pigs with mean initial live weight of 28.7±2.2 kg. The pigs were in the growing and fattening stage. With respect to the manner of the tunnel ventilation in the solar piggery, the positive and negative pressure ventilations as well as the fan working at different conditions was applied in experiments. During winter, with temperature about -13℃, the average air temperature inside the piggery was 3.0℃, which was higher than that in the control pig house, while the relative humidity was reduced by 4%, on average. On the floor 2 m away from the air inlet of the experimental house, the average daytime temperature using axial fans was higher than that with natural ventilation and using induced draft fans by 0.7℃ and 1.5℃, respectively, while the corresponding nighttime temperature was higher by 1.1℃ and 2.9℃, on average. On the floor 1 m away from the air inlet of the experimental house, the average daytime temperature using axial fans was higher than with natural ventilation and using induced draft fans by 3.6℃and 3.8℃, respectively, while the corresponding nighttime temperature was higher by 6.4℃and 6.9℃, on average. It can be concluded that using a tunnel ventilation system combined with solar energy utilization can greatly increase the floor temperature and decrease the indoor relative humidity simultaneously in the pig house.