医学信息
醫學信息
의학신식
MEDICAL INFORMATION
2014年
25期
69-69,70
,共2页
单极电刀%扁桃体切除术%扁桃体剥离术
單極電刀%扁桃體切除術%扁桃體剝離術
단겁전도%편도체절제술%편도체박리술
Monopolar electrocautery%Tonsil ectom%Tonsil ectomy by dissection
目的比较分析单极电刀扁桃体切除术与传统扁桃体剥离术的临床疗效。方法将行扁桃体切除术的140例患者，随机分为实验组(A组)与对照组(B组)，每组70例，均在全麻下进行。A组使用单极电刀电凝方法切除扁桃体， B组采用传统扁桃体剥离术。分析两组在手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛程度方面的差异。结果两组在手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛程度方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论全麻下使用单极电刀切除扁桃体手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛等指标与传统方法相比更具优势。
目的比較分析單極電刀扁桃體切除術與傳統扁桃體剝離術的臨床療效。方法將行扁桃體切除術的140例患者，隨機分為實驗組(A組)與對照組(B組)，每組70例，均在全痳下進行。A組使用單極電刀電凝方法切除扁桃體， B組採用傳統扁桃體剝離術。分析兩組在手術時間、術中齣血量、術後疼痛程度方麵的差異。結果兩組在手術時間、術中齣血量、術後疼痛程度方麵差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論全痳下使用單極電刀切除扁桃體手術時間、術中齣血量、術後疼痛等指標與傳統方法相比更具優勢。
목적비교분석단겁전도편도체절제술여전통편도체박리술적림상료효。방법장행편도체절제술적140례환자，수궤분위실험조(A조)여대조조(B조)，매조70례，균재전마하진행。A조사용단겁전도전응방법절제편도체， B조채용전통편도체박리술。분석량조재수술시간、술중출혈량、술후동통정도방면적차이。결과량조재수술시간、술중출혈량、술후동통정도방면차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론전마하사용단겁전도절제편도체수술시간、술중출혈량、술후동통등지표여전통방법상비경구우세。
Objective To compare the clinical ef iciency of monopolar electrocautery and traditional tonsil ectomy. Methods 140 patients were divided into two groups:experimental group A and control group B (70 patients per group). All patients were operated under the general anesthesia. Group A was treated with monopolar electrocautery, while group B was treated with traditional tonsillectomy. The operating time , hemorrhage during the operation and postoperative pain were analyzed. Results There were significant dif erences in the operating time, hemorrhage during the operation and postoperative pain ( <0.05). Conclusion Tonsil ectomy with monopolar electrocautery has more advantages to traditional tonsil ectomy in the operating time, hemorrhage during the operation and postoperative pain.
