中国医疗美容
中國醫療美容
중국의료미용
China Medical Cosmetology
2014年
3期
208-208,167
,共2页
口腔修复%口腔粘结材料%临床疗效
口腔脩複%口腔粘結材料%臨床療效
구강수복%구강점결재료%림상료효
Oral repair%Oral bonding material%Clinical curative effect
目的:探讨口腔粘结材料在口腔修复治疗中应用价值。方法回顾性分析在我院进行口腔修复的104例患者的临床资料,所有患者随机分成两组,玻璃离子粘固组与聚羧酸锌粘固组,每组52例患者。通过术后随访,比较两组患者的临床效果、并发症以及满意程度等。结果玻璃离子粘固组出现并发症为5.77%(3/52),与聚羧酸锌粘固组的7.69%(4/52)的并发症率相比差异不显著(P>0.05),玻璃离子粘固组患者满意率为92.31%(48/52)与聚羧酸锌粘固组的90.38%(47/52)相比差异不显著(P>0.05),差异无统计学意义。结论采用口腔粘结材料进行口腔修复治疗能显著改善患者的治愈率,该研究中的两种材料在临床疗效上差异不显著。
目的:探討口腔粘結材料在口腔脩複治療中應用價值。方法迴顧性分析在我院進行口腔脩複的104例患者的臨床資料,所有患者隨機分成兩組,玻璃離子粘固組與聚羧痠鋅粘固組,每組52例患者。通過術後隨訪,比較兩組患者的臨床效果、併髮癥以及滿意程度等。結果玻璃離子粘固組齣現併髮癥為5.77%(3/52),與聚羧痠鋅粘固組的7.69%(4/52)的併髮癥率相比差異不顯著(P>0.05),玻璃離子粘固組患者滿意率為92.31%(48/52)與聚羧痠鋅粘固組的90.38%(47/52)相比差異不顯著(P>0.05),差異無統計學意義。結論採用口腔粘結材料進行口腔脩複治療能顯著改善患者的治愈率,該研究中的兩種材料在臨床療效上差異不顯著。
목적:탐토구강점결재료재구강수복치료중응용개치。방법회고성분석재아원진행구강수복적104례환자적림상자료,소유환자수궤분성량조,파리리자점고조여취최산자점고조,매조52례환자。통과술후수방,비교량조환자적림상효과、병발증이급만의정도등。결과파리리자점고조출현병발증위5.77%(3/52),여취최산자점고조적7.69%(4/52)적병발증솔상비차이불현저(P>0.05),파리리자점고조환자만의솔위92.31%(48/52)여취최산자점고조적90.38%(47/52)상비차이불현저(P>0.05),차이무통계학의의。결론채용구강점결재료진행구강수복치료능현저개선환자적치유솔,해연구중적량충재료재림상료효상차이불현저。
Objective To explore and analyze the oral bonding material application value in the oral cavity repair treatment. Methods Were retrospectively analyzed in our hospital for dental restorations of the clinical data of 104 patients, all patients were randomly divided into two groups, glass ion cement with poly (carboxylic acid zinc cement group, 52 patients in each group. The postoperative follow-up, compare the clinical effect of two groups of patients, complications, and satisfaction. Results Glass ion cement group in 3 cases of complications accounted for 5.77% of total (3/52), and poly (carboxylic acid zinc cement group of 7.69% (4/52) of the rate of complications compared with no significant difference (P > 0.05), glass ion cement group of patients satisfaction rate was 92.31% (48/52) and poly (carboxylic acid zinc cement group no significant difference compared to the 90.38% (47/52) (P > 0.05), the difference is statistically significant. Conclusion Using oral bonded materials for oral cavity repair treatment can significantly improve the cure rate of patients, the study of the two materials no significant difference in clinical curative effect.