华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)
華中科技大學學報(社會科學版)
화중과기대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION)
2014年
5期
47-53
,共7页
边缘%空间%差异性%承认政治
邊緣%空間%差異性%承認政治
변연%공간%차이성%승인정치
margin%space%difference%politics of recognition
在空间的场域下,边缘压迫会致使“卑贱意识”与“贱民”产生,其症结在于边缘空间中的种族、民族、性别、群体及其文化价值无法获得应有的承认。从福柯开始,到多元文化主义,再到后现代激进地理学,不约而同地采取了一种差异性空间的方式来贯彻“为承认而斗争”的战斗口号,以期建构起一种全新的空间格局来实现对同一性霸权的替代。但以差异政治凸现出的承认叙事,其缺陷在于不仅忽略了形成边缘压迫的物质基础与历史过程,而且也回避了个体行动的建构性责任,从而抽掉了为承认而斗争的真实基础,最终造成了一种价值与现实之间的错位。针对由此而造成的边缘革命困境,西方左派提出了诸多解决方案,但都陷入了革命主体的“空场”和行动的“裂隙”之中。我们的立场在于,回到马克思的“历史科学”,从根本上扬弃西方意义上的边缘决定论,将边缘空间的承认话语转变为一种突破资本主义“薄弱环节”的历史实践,从而将对同一性霸权的斗争体现为一种现实的生动。
在空間的場域下,邊緣壓迫會緻使“卑賤意識”與“賤民”產生,其癥結在于邊緣空間中的種族、民族、性彆、群體及其文化價值無法穫得應有的承認。從福柯開始,到多元文化主義,再到後現代激進地理學,不約而同地採取瞭一種差異性空間的方式來貫徹“為承認而鬥爭”的戰鬥口號,以期建構起一種全新的空間格跼來實現對同一性霸權的替代。但以差異政治凸現齣的承認敘事,其缺陷在于不僅忽略瞭形成邊緣壓迫的物質基礎與歷史過程,而且也迴避瞭箇體行動的建構性責任,從而抽掉瞭為承認而鬥爭的真實基礎,最終造成瞭一種價值與現實之間的錯位。針對由此而造成的邊緣革命睏境,西方左派提齣瞭諸多解決方案,但都陷入瞭革命主體的“空場”和行動的“裂隙”之中。我們的立場在于,迴到馬剋思的“歷史科學”,從根本上颺棄西方意義上的邊緣決定論,將邊緣空間的承認話語轉變為一種突破資本主義“薄弱環節”的歷史實踐,從而將對同一性霸權的鬥爭體現為一種現實的生動。
재공간적장역하,변연압박회치사“비천의식”여“천민”산생,기증결재우변연공간중적충족、민족、성별、군체급기문화개치무법획득응유적승인。종복가개시,도다원문화주의,재도후현대격진지이학,불약이동지채취료일충차이성공간적방식래관철“위승인이두쟁”적전두구호,이기건구기일충전신적공간격국래실현대동일성패권적체대。단이차이정치철현출적승인서사,기결함재우불부홀략료형성변연압박적물질기출여역사과정,이차야회피료개체행동적건구성책임,종이추도료위승인이두쟁적진실기출,최종조성료일충개치여현실지간적착위。침대유차이조성적변연혁명곤경,서방좌파제출료제다해결방안,단도함입료혁명주체적“공장”화행동적“렬극”지중。아문적립장재우,회도마극사적“역사과학”,종근본상양기서방의의상적변연결정론,장변연공간적승인화어전변위일충돌파자본주의“박약배절”적역사실천,종이장대동일성패권적두쟁체현위일충현실적생동。
Spatial oppression in the margin leads to “despised consciousness” and“subaltern” (Hegel). It is because the race, nation, sex, group and its cultural value living in the margin space cannot been recog-nized.Starting from Foucault , multiculturalism to the postmodern radical geography , they coincidentally take the way of spatial difference to implement the rallying cry of “struggle for recognition”, so as to construct a new space structure to replace the hegemony of identity .But the defect of recognitive narrative with politics of differences is that this way not only ignores the material foundation and the historical process of the oppression in the formation of the margin , but also it avoids the construction of individual responsibility of action .Thus it takes off the real basis of struggle for recognition , resulting in a kind of dislocation between the value and the reality.According to the dilemma of the margin revolution , western leftists put forward several solutions , but all fell into “vacancy” of the revolutionary subject and actional “fissure”.Our position is that we should re-turn to Marx's “the science of history”, fundamentally sublate the western sense of margin determinism and change recognitive discourse of margin space into historical practice of breakthrough the “weak link” of capi-talism, thus we can make the struggle to identity hegemony to emerge in a realistic vividness .