山东农业科学
山東農業科學
산동농업과학
SHANGDONG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
2014年
9期
63-68
,共6页
聂良鹏%李增嘉%宁堂原%郭利伟%冯宇鹏%李娜%丁娜
聶良鵬%李增嘉%寧堂原%郭利偉%馮宇鵬%李娜%丁娜
섭량붕%리증가%저당원%곽리위%풍우붕%리나%정나
年内轮耕%小麦-玉米两熟%土壤水稳性团聚体%碳%氮分布
年內輪耕%小麥-玉米兩熟%土壤水穩性糰聚體%碳%氮分佈
년내륜경%소맥-옥미량숙%토양수은성단취체%탄%담분포
Rotation tillage within a year%Maize-wheat double -cropping%Soil water-stable aggre-gate%Distributions of organic carbon and nitrogen
在华北平原小麦-玉米两熟区,设置6种年内轮耕模式,即小麦季免耕玉米季免耕( WZ-MZ)、小麦季免耕玉米季深松( WZ-MS)、小麦季深松玉米季免耕( WS-MZ)、小麦季深松玉米季深松( WS-MS)、小麦季翻耕玉米季免耕( WC-MZ)、小麦季翻耕玉米季深松( WC-MS),探讨年内轮耕模式对土壤水稳性团聚体碳、氮分布的影响。结果表明,MS的年内轮耕模式比MZ有利于0~40 cm土层微团聚体聚成更大粒级的团聚体和保护大团聚体免受破坏;无论玉米季免耕还是深松条件下,与WZ、WC相比, WS能提高10~40 cm土层>0.25 mm粒级的大团聚体含量;WZ和WS比WC能显著提高土壤表层有机碳及全氮,使更多的碳、氮在土壤表层聚集;MS比MZ能降低0~10 cm和提高10~40 cm土层团聚体中有机碳及全氮含量;WZ能显著提高土壤0~10 cm土壤团聚体中C/N;无论小麦季采用哪种耕作方式,MS比MZ能降低0~10 cm和提高10~40 cm土层团聚体中C/N。
在華北平原小麥-玉米兩熟區,設置6種年內輪耕模式,即小麥季免耕玉米季免耕( WZ-MZ)、小麥季免耕玉米季深鬆( WZ-MS)、小麥季深鬆玉米季免耕( WS-MZ)、小麥季深鬆玉米季深鬆( WS-MS)、小麥季翻耕玉米季免耕( WC-MZ)、小麥季翻耕玉米季深鬆( WC-MS),探討年內輪耕模式對土壤水穩性糰聚體碳、氮分佈的影響。結果錶明,MS的年內輪耕模式比MZ有利于0~40 cm土層微糰聚體聚成更大粒級的糰聚體和保護大糰聚體免受破壞;無論玉米季免耕還是深鬆條件下,與WZ、WC相比, WS能提高10~40 cm土層>0.25 mm粒級的大糰聚體含量;WZ和WS比WC能顯著提高土壤錶層有機碳及全氮,使更多的碳、氮在土壤錶層聚集;MS比MZ能降低0~10 cm和提高10~40 cm土層糰聚體中有機碳及全氮含量;WZ能顯著提高土壤0~10 cm土壤糰聚體中C/N;無論小麥季採用哪種耕作方式,MS比MZ能降低0~10 cm和提高10~40 cm土層糰聚體中C/N。
재화북평원소맥-옥미량숙구,설치6충년내륜경모식,즉소맥계면경옥미계면경( WZ-MZ)、소맥계면경옥미계심송( WZ-MS)、소맥계심송옥미계면경( WS-MZ)、소맥계심송옥미계심송( WS-MS)、소맥계번경옥미계면경( WC-MZ)、소맥계번경옥미계심송( WC-MS),탐토년내륜경모식대토양수은성단취체탄、담분포적영향。결과표명,MS적년내륜경모식비MZ유리우0~40 cm토층미단취체취성경대립급적단취체화보호대단취체면수파배;무론옥미계면경환시심송조건하,여WZ、WC상비, WS능제고10~40 cm토층>0.25 mm립급적대단취체함량;WZ화WS비WC능현저제고토양표층유궤탄급전담,사경다적탄、담재토양표층취집;MS비MZ능강저0~10 cm화제고10~40 cm토층단취체중유궤탄급전담함량;WZ능현저제고토양0~10 cm토양단취체중C/N;무론소맥계채용나충경작방식,MS비MZ능강저0~10 cm화제고10~40 cm토층단취체중C/N。
Six rotation tillage modes were used to study the effects of different rotation tillage modes with-in a year on the distributions of organic carbon and nitrogen in soil water -stable aggregates in wheat -maize double-cropping system in North China Plain .The effects of wheat and maize both no -tillage ( WZ-MZ) , wheat no-tillage and maize subsoiling (WZ-MS), wheat subsoiling and maize no -tillage (WS-MZ), wheat and maize both subsoiling ( WS-MS) , wheat conventional tillage and maize no -tillage ( WC-MZ) , wheat conventional tillage and maize subsoiling ( WC-MS) were compared under the same sowing date and seedling densities .The results showed that the rotation tillage mode of MS within a year was better for soil mi-cro aggregate gathering into larger aggregates in 0~40 cm soil layer and protecting large aggregates from dam-age than MZ.Under maize no -tillage or subsoiling condition , compared with WZ and WC , WS could im-prove the content of large aggregate (>0.25 mm) in 10~40 cm soil layer.Compared with WC, WZ and WS could significantly increase the soil organic carbon and total nitrogen content in surface soil and make more carbon and nitrogen gathering in surface soil .MS could reduce the soil organic carbon and total nitrogen con-tent in the aggregates in 0~10 cm soil layer and raise those in 10~40 cm soil layer than MZ .WZ could sig-nificantly increase the C/N in the aggregates in 0~10 cm soil layer .No matter what tillage mode of wheat , MS could reduce the C/N in the aggregates in 0~10 cm soil layer and raise that in 10~40 cm soil layer than MZ.