中国民康医学
中國民康醫學
중국민강의학
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF CHINSEE PEOPLE HEALTH
2014年
17期
12-14
,共3页
阿立哌唑%氯氮平%联用%维持治疗%认知功能
阿立哌唑%氯氮平%聯用%維持治療%認知功能
아립고서%록담평%련용%유지치료%인지공능
Aripiprazole%Clozapine%Combination%Maintenance treatment%Cognitive function
目的:探讨阿立哌唑联用氯氮平维持治疗对慢性精神分裂症患者认知功能的影响。方法:入组40例维持期的慢性精神分裂症患者,均为阿立哌唑联用氯氮平治疗(联用组),与同期住院的40例单用氯氮平治疗的慢性精神分裂症患者(单用组)对照。分别于入组时、入组后6个月、12个月采用重复性成套神经心理状态测验( RBANS)评定患者的认知功能,并同时用PANSS量表评定患者的临床疗效,副反应量表(TESS)评定药物不良反应。结果:PANSS总评分入组时、入组后12个月两组患者之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),各组患者治疗前后差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05)。认知功能评定联用组患者入组后6个月开始注意功能因子分,即刻记忆因子分与入组前相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其它视觉广度、言语功能、延迟记忆因子分入组前后差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),单用组患者5项因子分入组前后差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。总不良反应两组患者间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:阿立哌唑联用氯氮平维持治疗是一种安全有效的治疗方法,能部分改善患者的认知功能障碍,不良反应小。
目的:探討阿立哌唑聯用氯氮平維持治療對慢性精神分裂癥患者認知功能的影響。方法:入組40例維持期的慢性精神分裂癥患者,均為阿立哌唑聯用氯氮平治療(聯用組),與同期住院的40例單用氯氮平治療的慢性精神分裂癥患者(單用組)對照。分彆于入組時、入組後6箇月、12箇月採用重複性成套神經心理狀態測驗( RBANS)評定患者的認知功能,併同時用PANSS量錶評定患者的臨床療效,副反應量錶(TESS)評定藥物不良反應。結果:PANSS總評分入組時、入組後12箇月兩組患者之間差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),各組患者治療前後差異也無統計學意義(P>0.05)。認知功能評定聯用組患者入組後6箇月開始註意功能因子分,即刻記憶因子分與入組前相比差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),其它視覺廣度、言語功能、延遲記憶因子分入組前後差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),單用組患者5項因子分入組前後差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05)。總不良反應兩組患者間差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論:阿立哌唑聯用氯氮平維持治療是一種安全有效的治療方法,能部分改善患者的認知功能障礙,不良反應小。
목적:탐토아립고서련용록담평유지치료대만성정신분렬증환자인지공능적영향。방법:입조40례유지기적만성정신분렬증환자,균위아립고서련용록담평치료(련용조),여동기주원적40례단용록담평치료적만성정신분렬증환자(단용조)대조。분별우입조시、입조후6개월、12개월채용중복성성투신경심리상태측험( RBANS)평정환자적인지공능,병동시용PANSS량표평정환자적림상료효,부반응량표(TESS)평정약물불량반응。결과:PANSS총평분입조시、입조후12개월량조환자지간차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),각조환자치료전후차이야무통계학의의(P>0.05)。인지공능평정련용조환자입조후6개월개시주의공능인자분,즉각기억인자분여입조전상비차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),기타시각엄도、언어공능、연지기억인자분입조전후차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),단용조환자5항인자분입조전후차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05)。총불량반응량조환자간차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론:아립고서련용록담평유지치료시일충안전유효적치료방법,능부분개선환자적인지공능장애,불량반응소。
Objective:To discuss influence of Aripiprazole combined with Clozapine on cognitive function in maintenance treat-ment of chronic schizophrenic patients. Methods:40 admitted schizophrenic patients in maintenance stage, who were all treated by u-sing Aripiprazole combined with Clozapine, were used as combination group, whilethe other 40 admitted schizophrenia patients at the same time, who were treated by Clozapine, were chosen as single group. Their cognitive functions were assess by repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status ( RBANS) , the clinical effects were evaluated by PANSS, and adverse drug reactions were assessed by treatment emergent symptom scale ( TESS) at admission and 6 and 12 months after admission. Results:There were no sta-tistical differences in the total scores of PANSS at admission and 12 months after admission between the two groups (P>0. 05). There were no statistical differences for the two groups before and after the treatment (P>0. 05). In the assessment of cognitive function, the combination group began to pay attention to functional factor scores, and the immediate memorial factor score difference had the statisti-cal significance before and after admission (P<0. 05). There were no statistical differences in the scores of visual span, speech func-tion and delayed memorial factor for combination group before and after admission (P>0. 05). 5 factor scores of single group all had no statistical differences before and after admission (P>0. 05). The differences in the total adverse reactions between the two groups had the statistical significance (P<0. 05). Conclusions:Aripiprazole combined with Clozapine for the maintenance treatment is a safe and effective method, which can improve the patients' cognitive functional disorder with little adverse reactions.