中国实用神经疾病杂志
中國實用神經疾病雜誌
중국실용신경질병잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NERVOUS DISEASES
2014年
20期
33-35
,共3页
张永超%杨洪安%张振%刘威
張永超%楊洪安%張振%劉威
장영초%양홍안%장진%류위
大面积脑梗死%标准大骨瓣开颅术
大麵積腦梗死%標準大骨瓣開顱術
대면적뇌경사%표준대골판개로술
Large area cerebral infarction%Standard large trauma craniotomy
目的:探讨标准大骨瓣开颅术治疗大面积脑梗死的临床疗效。方法选择2012-01-2013-12我院收治的大面积脑梗死患者46例(脑梗死范围直径>4.0 cm ),随机分成观察组和对照组各23例,观察组患者应用标准大骨瓣开颅术治疗,对照组应用常规大骨瓣开颅术治疗,对比2组患者治疗前后GCS评分、脑梗死灶范围变化情况和预后情况。结果2组治疗前GCS评分及脑梗死情况无显著差异(P<0.05);2组术后GCS评分均有改善,观察组明显优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组临床疗效明显优于对照组(P<0.05),且观察组梗死灶面积明显缩小,改善程度优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论标准大骨瓣开颅术治疗大面积脑梗死疗效满意,能降低病死率,是手术治疗的有效方法。
目的:探討標準大骨瓣開顱術治療大麵積腦梗死的臨床療效。方法選擇2012-01-2013-12我院收治的大麵積腦梗死患者46例(腦梗死範圍直徑>4.0 cm ),隨機分成觀察組和對照組各23例,觀察組患者應用標準大骨瓣開顱術治療,對照組應用常規大骨瓣開顱術治療,對比2組患者治療前後GCS評分、腦梗死竈範圍變化情況和預後情況。結果2組治療前GCS評分及腦梗死情況無顯著差異(P<0.05);2組術後GCS評分均有改善,觀察組明顯優于對照組(P<0.05);觀察組臨床療效明顯優于對照組(P<0.05),且觀察組梗死竈麵積明顯縮小,改善程度優于對照組(P<0.05)。結論標準大骨瓣開顱術治療大麵積腦梗死療效滿意,能降低病死率,是手術治療的有效方法。
목적:탐토표준대골판개로술치료대면적뇌경사적림상료효。방법선택2012-01-2013-12아원수치적대면적뇌경사환자46례(뇌경사범위직경>4.0 cm ),수궤분성관찰조화대조조각23례,관찰조환자응용표준대골판개로술치료,대조조응용상규대골판개로술치료,대비2조환자치료전후GCS평분、뇌경사조범위변화정황화예후정황。결과2조치료전GCS평분급뇌경사정황무현저차이(P<0.05);2조술후GCS평분균유개선,관찰조명현우우대조조(P<0.05);관찰조림상료효명현우우대조조(P<0.05),차관찰조경사조면적명현축소,개선정도우우대조조(P<0.05)。결론표준대골판개로술치료대면적뇌경사료효만의,능강저병사솔,시수술치료적유효방법。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of standard large trauma craniotomy in the treatment of massive cerebral infarction .Methods Forty-six patients with massive cerebral infarction from January 2012 to December 2013 in our hospital cases (infarct 4.0 cm or more in diameter) were randomly divided into observation group and control group each 23 ca-ses.Patients in observation group applied standard large trauma craniotomy treatment ,patients in the control group applied con-ventional large craniotomy treatment. The GCS score of two groups of patients before and after treatment ,infarct scope changes and prognosis were compared. Results The GCS scores of two groups before the treatment had no significant difference (P<0.05).The GCS scores in two groups after surgery were improved ,but the improvement of observation group were significantly better than that of control group (P<0.05).The clinical efficacy of observation group was better than that of control group ,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05) ,and the infarction area of observation group was significantly reduced ,the de-gree of improvement was better than the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion The standard large trauma craniotomy for mas-sive cerebral infarction has satisfactory clinical efficacy ,and can reduce the mortality ,it is an effective method of surgical treat-ment.