中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2014年
25期
58-58,59
,共2页
肛瘘%分段%开窗%旷置%引流
肛瘺%分段%開窗%曠置%引流
항루%분단%개창%광치%인류
Anal fistula%Break%Window%Exclusion%Drainage
目的:探讨在复杂性肛瘘中的应用分段开窗旷置对口引流的疗效。方法100例复杂性肛瘘患者随机分为两组,观察组50例,对照组50例,观察组采用分段开窗旷置对口引流治疗,对照组采用低切高挂术治疗。观察术后疗效,肛门失禁和肛门移位的评分,复发情况。结果对照组治疗后总有效率为82%,观察组治疗后总有效率为98%,观察组总有效率明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。术后观察组的肛门失禁和肛门移位的评分均明显低于对照组(均P<0.01)。术后平均随访1年,对照组复发5例,复发率为12.2%(5/41);观察组复发率为0%;观察组复发率明显少于对照组(P<0.01)。结论分段开窗旷置对口引流治疗复杂性肛瘘疗效显著,并发症少,复发率低。
目的:探討在複雜性肛瘺中的應用分段開窗曠置對口引流的療效。方法100例複雜性肛瘺患者隨機分為兩組,觀察組50例,對照組50例,觀察組採用分段開窗曠置對口引流治療,對照組採用低切高掛術治療。觀察術後療效,肛門失禁和肛門移位的評分,複髮情況。結果對照組治療後總有效率為82%,觀察組治療後總有效率為98%,觀察組總有效率明顯高于對照組(P<0.05)。術後觀察組的肛門失禁和肛門移位的評分均明顯低于對照組(均P<0.01)。術後平均隨訪1年,對照組複髮5例,複髮率為12.2%(5/41);觀察組複髮率為0%;觀察組複髮率明顯少于對照組(P<0.01)。結論分段開窗曠置對口引流治療複雜性肛瘺療效顯著,併髮癥少,複髮率低。
목적:탐토재복잡성항루중적응용분단개창광치대구인류적료효。방법100례복잡성항루환자수궤분위량조,관찰조50례,대조조50례,관찰조채용분단개창광치대구인류치료,대조조채용저절고괘술치료。관찰술후료효,항문실금화항문이위적평분,복발정황。결과대조조치료후총유효솔위82%,관찰조치료후총유효솔위98%,관찰조총유효솔명현고우대조조(P<0.05)。술후관찰조적항문실금화항문이위적평분균명현저우대조조(균P<0.01)。술후평균수방1년,대조조복발5례,복발솔위12.2%(5/41);관찰조복발솔위0%;관찰조복발솔명현소우대조조(P<0.01)。결론분단개창광치대구인류치료복잡성항루료효현저,병발증소,복발솔저。
Objective To study the effectiveness of break window exclusion counterparts drainage in complex anal fistula.Methods 100 patients with complex anal fistula were randomly divided into two groups, the observation group(n=50) who were operated through break window exclusion counterparts drainage, and the control group(n=50) who were operated through low-cut hanging surgery. Postoperative effect, shift and anal incontinence score, relapse were obervated.Results After treatment, the control group total effective rate was 82% and 98% in the observation group,the total efficiency of the observation group was significantly higher(P<0.05). Shift and anal incontinence score in the observation group were lower than these in the control group(P<0.01). After a mean folow-up of 1 year, 5 cases of recurrence in the control group, the recurrence rate was 12.2%(5/41); recurrence rate was 0% in the observation group.Relapse rate in the observation group was significantly less than the control group(P<0.01).Conclusions Break Window exclusion counterparts fistula drainage had better efficacy significantly fewer complications, and lower recurrence rate.