中国听力语言康复科学杂志
中國聽力語言康複科學雜誌
중국은력어언강복과학잡지
CHINESE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF HEARING AND SPEECH REHABILITATION
2014年
5期
347-349
,共3页
程晓婷%刘宸%丁大雄%张山山%潘征%王世强%翟所强%杨仕明%张榕%于宁
程曉婷%劉宸%丁大雄%張山山%潘徵%王世彊%翟所彊%楊仕明%張榕%于寧
정효정%류신%정대웅%장산산%반정%왕세강%적소강%양사명%장용%우저
噪声%耳聋%耳鸣%低频听力
譟聲%耳聾%耳鳴%低頻聽力
조성%이롱%이명%저빈은력
Noise%Hearing loss%Tinnitus%Low-frequency hearing
目的:通过分析船队工作人员的听力情况,了解相关人员听力损失及耳鸣现状,为进一步完善噪声防护提供依据。方法对噪声岗位97名、非噪声岗位28名工作人员行声导抗和纯音测听(0.25~8 kHz)检查,通过问卷调查工作人员的耳鸣情况。结果非噪声、噪声岗位人员的平均听阈分别为25.39±9.67 dB HL、31.85±10.20 dB HL,语言频率听阈分别为24.51±8.84 dB HL、30.63±10.28 dB HL,高频听阈分别为27.99±17.75 dB HL、34.73±16.97 dB HL,低频听阈为25.04±8.20 dB HL、33.97±10.16 dB HL。非噪声、噪声岗位人员的耳鸣发生率分别为10.71%和53.61%。结论船舶噪声不仅引起高频听力损失,低频听力也出现下降。噪声岗位人员的耳鸣发生率是非噪声岗位人员的4~5倍。
目的:通過分析船隊工作人員的聽力情況,瞭解相關人員聽力損失及耳鳴現狀,為進一步完善譟聲防護提供依據。方法對譟聲崗位97名、非譟聲崗位28名工作人員行聲導抗和純音測聽(0.25~8 kHz)檢查,通過問捲調查工作人員的耳鳴情況。結果非譟聲、譟聲崗位人員的平均聽閾分彆為25.39±9.67 dB HL、31.85±10.20 dB HL,語言頻率聽閾分彆為24.51±8.84 dB HL、30.63±10.28 dB HL,高頻聽閾分彆為27.99±17.75 dB HL、34.73±16.97 dB HL,低頻聽閾為25.04±8.20 dB HL、33.97±10.16 dB HL。非譟聲、譟聲崗位人員的耳鳴髮生率分彆為10.71%和53.61%。結論船舶譟聲不僅引起高頻聽力損失,低頻聽力也齣現下降。譟聲崗位人員的耳鳴髮生率是非譟聲崗位人員的4~5倍。
목적:통과분석선대공작인원적은력정황,료해상관인원은력손실급이명현상,위진일보완선조성방호제공의거。방법대조성강위97명、비조성강위28명공작인원행성도항화순음측은(0.25~8 kHz)검사,통과문권조사공작인원적이명정황。결과비조성、조성강위인원적평균은역분별위25.39±9.67 dB HL、31.85±10.20 dB HL,어언빈솔은역분별위24.51±8.84 dB HL、30.63±10.28 dB HL,고빈은역분별위27.99±17.75 dB HL、34.73±16.97 dB HL,저빈은역위25.04±8.20 dB HL、33.97±10.16 dB HL。비조성、조성강위인원적이명발생솔분별위10.71%화53.61%。결론선박조성불부인기고빈은력손실,저빈은력야출현하강。조성강위인원적이명발생솔시비조성강위인원적4~5배。
Objective To analyze the hearing test results of the ship’s staff, to investigate the hearing status of relevant staff regarding hearing loss and tinnitus and to provide references for the further improvement of noise protection.Methods 97 noise-exposed staff members and 28 non-noise-exposed staff members received acoustic immittance measurement, pure-tone audiometry (0.25-8 kHz) and a questionnaire survey on tinnitus.Results The average hearing thresholds of non-noise-exposed staff members and noise-exposed staff members were 25.39±9.67 dB HL and 31.85±10.20 dB HL, respectively. The hearing thresholds of non-noise-exposed and noise-exposed staff members at the speech frequency range were 24.51±8.84 dB HL and 30.63±10.28 dB HL, respectively. The high-frequency hearing thresholds of non-noise-exposed and noise-exposed staff members were 27.99±17.75 dB HL and 34.73±16.97 dB HL, respectively. The low-frequency hearing thresholds of non-noise-exposed and noise-exposed staff members were 25.04±8.20 dB HL and 33.97±10.16 dB HL, respectively. The incidences of tinnitus were 10.71% and 53.61% for the non-noise-exposed staff members and noise-exposed staff members, respectively.Conclusion Ship noise not only causes hearing loss at high frequencies, but also results in hearing impairment at low frequencies. The incidence of tinnitus in noise-exposed staff members is 4-5 times as high as that in non-noise-exposed staff members.