听力学及言语疾病杂志
聽力學及言語疾病雜誌
은역학급언어질병잡지
JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY AND SPEECH PATHOLOGY
2014年
5期
471-474
,共4页
Kim Ha-kyung%Hwang Young -jin%曹艳静%刘晓明%黄昭鸣
Kim Ha-kyung%Hwang Young -jin%曹豔靜%劉曉明%黃昭鳴
Kim Ha-kyung%Hwang Young -jin%조염정%류효명%황소명
鼻流量测试%语句材料%性别%NasalView?
鼻流量測試%語句材料%性彆%NasalView?
비류량측시%어구재료%성별%NasalView?
Nasalance scores%Reading materials%Gender%NasalView?
目的：检验鼻流量测试新语句材料的测试效度，并分析其测试结果的性别差异。方法应用本研究编制的鼻流量测试新语句材料和目前中国主要使用的鼻流量测试原语句材料，用NasalView 棆鼻流量测试仪测试102例年龄18～23岁的北京在校大学生的鼻流量值，男女各半，均在北京出生且居住18年以上，均以北京话为交流语言，比较其结果和男女差异。结果①新材料鼻腔句、口腔句和口鼻腔句测试的平均鼻流量值分别为56．58％±3．43％、33．86％±5．24％和49．49％±4．13％，原材料的测试结果分别为54．31％±4．43％、35．64％±5．90％和47．12％±4．96％，差异均有显著统计学意义，且女生较男生高（均为 P＜0．01）；②鼻流量测试新材料与原材料测试结果之间有相关关系，鼻腔句 r＝．899（ P＜0．01），口腔句 r＝0．850（ P＜0．01），口鼻腔句 r＝0．8510（ P＜0．01）；③新材料测试结果的标准误较原材料更小，差异有极显著统计学意义（P＜0．01）。结论鼻流量测试新语句材料具有较好的测试效度，与原语句材料之间存在较高的相关关系，利用新材料进行鼻流量测试时，其结果会更准确，可信度更高；正常青年女性鼻流量值较男性高。
目的：檢驗鼻流量測試新語句材料的測試效度，併分析其測試結果的性彆差異。方法應用本研究編製的鼻流量測試新語句材料和目前中國主要使用的鼻流量測試原語句材料，用NasalView 棆鼻流量測試儀測試102例年齡18～23歲的北京在校大學生的鼻流量值，男女各半，均在北京齣生且居住18年以上，均以北京話為交流語言，比較其結果和男女差異。結果①新材料鼻腔句、口腔句和口鼻腔句測試的平均鼻流量值分彆為56．58％±3．43％、33．86％±5．24％和49．49％±4．13％，原材料的測試結果分彆為54．31％±4．43％、35．64％±5．90％和47．12％±4．96％，差異均有顯著統計學意義，且女生較男生高（均為 P＜0．01）；②鼻流量測試新材料與原材料測試結果之間有相關關繫，鼻腔句 r＝．899（ P＜0．01），口腔句 r＝0．850（ P＜0．01），口鼻腔句 r＝0．8510（ P＜0．01）；③新材料測試結果的標準誤較原材料更小，差異有極顯著統計學意義（P＜0．01）。結論鼻流量測試新語句材料具有較好的測試效度，與原語句材料之間存在較高的相關關繫，利用新材料進行鼻流量測試時，其結果會更準確，可信度更高；正常青年女性鼻流量值較男性高。
목적：검험비류량측시신어구재료적측시효도，병분석기측시결과적성별차이。방법응용본연구편제적비류량측시신어구재료화목전중국주요사용적비류량측시원어구재료，용NasalView 륜비류량측시의측시102례년령18～23세적북경재교대학생적비류량치，남녀각반，균재북경출생차거주18년이상，균이북경화위교류어언，비교기결과화남녀차이。결과①신재료비강구、구강구화구비강구측시적평균비류량치분별위56．58％±3．43％、33．86％±5．24％화49．49％±4．13％，원재료적측시결과분별위54．31％±4．43％、35．64％±5．90％화47．12％±4．96％，차이균유현저통계학의의，차녀생교남생고（균위 P＜0．01）；②비류량측시신재료여원재료측시결과지간유상관관계，비강구 r＝．899（ P＜0．01），구강구 r＝0．850（ P＜0．01），구비강구 r＝0．8510（ P＜0．01）；③신재료측시결과적표준오교원재료경소，차이유겁현저통계학의의（P＜0．01）。결론비류량측시신어구재료구유교호적측시효도，여원어구재료지간존재교고적상관관계，이용신재료진행비류량측시시，기결과회경준학，가신도경고；정상청년녀성비류량치교남성고。
Objective This study aimed to develop reading material for nasalance evaluation ,and find out na-salance scores associated with genders .Methods The NasalView ? (Tiger Electronics Inc .,Seattle ,USA) was used to obtain nasalance values in the new and old material .A total of 102 subjects (51 males ,51 females) who have lived in Beijing for 18 years or longer at the time of the experiment received the tests ,the results from two pieces of material and the mean nasalance gender score differences were compared .Results The mean nasalance scores of sen-tences were 56 .58% ± 3 .43% for'Nasal sentence',33 .86% ± 5 .24% for'Oral sentence',and 49 .49% ± 4 .13% for'Oro -nasal sentence'respectively in the new material .The mean nasalance scores of sentences were 54 .31% ± 4 .43% for'Nasal sentence',35 .64% ± 5 .90% for'Oral sentence',and 47 .12% ± 4 .96% for'Oro-nasal sentence're-spectively in the old material .There were significant differences between males and females through materials .The nasalance gender score differences showed that females were bigger than males (P<0 .01) .This study found a cor-relation between the new and old materials :'Nasal sentence'(r=0 .899 ,P< 0 .01) ,'Oral sentence'(r= 0 .850 ,P<0 .01) ,and'Oro -nasal sentence'(r=0 .851 ,P<0 .01) .The standard error difference showed that the new was smaller than the old (P<0 .01) .Conclusion The new material for nasalance evaluation has a better test validity ,and there is a high correlation between the old materials .The usage of the new material for nasalance evaluation will produce more accurate results with higher credibility .Normal female's nasalance scores were higher than males .
