计算机与应用化学
計算機與應用化學
계산궤여응용화학
COMPUTERS AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY
2014年
8期
897-901
,共5页
吴华帅%舒树礼%杨宁%刘明言
吳華帥%舒樹禮%楊寧%劉明言
오화수%서수례%양저%류명언
多级式转子定子搅拌器%多级叶轮式搅拌釜%剪切速率%功率消耗%CFD
多級式轉子定子攪拌器%多級葉輪式攪拌釜%剪切速率%功率消耗%CFD
다급식전자정자교반기%다급협륜식교반부%전절속솔%공솔소모%CFD
multistage rotor-stator%multi-impeller stirred column%strain rate%power characteristics%CFD
采用计算流体力学模拟方法对2种用于分散混合过程的高剪切搅拌器的流动特性进行研究分析,分别是转子定子搅拌器(RS)和多级叶轮式搅拌釜(CF)。本文从流场细节和功率消耗方面对其进行考察研究,从而为解释搅拌器中气泡的分散混合过程提供理论依据。模拟结果表明,在 RS 中流体大致呈周向流动,且剪切速率分布相对较为均匀,较高剪切速率不仅出现在转子到壁面的径向间隙处,而且出现在转子与定子之间的轴向间隙处;而在 CF 中,流体呈现较为明显的旋转流动,且剪切速率分布没有RS均匀,较高的剪切速率只出现在叶轮与壁面的径向间隙处。在相同转速下,虽然这2种搅拌器所形成的平均剪切速率差别不大,但CF中所形成的最大剪切速率大于RS,这也意味着相同操作条件下CF中所能形成的气泡尺寸更小,这与实验结果是一致的。对于这2种搅拌器,在层流区功率准数与搅拌雷诺数都成反比,且CFD模拟计算得到的结果与根据实验得到的关联式的结果基本一致。然而CF的功率消耗高于RS的功率消耗。
採用計算流體力學模擬方法對2種用于分散混閤過程的高剪切攪拌器的流動特性進行研究分析,分彆是轉子定子攪拌器(RS)和多級葉輪式攪拌釜(CF)。本文從流場細節和功率消耗方麵對其進行攷察研究,從而為解釋攪拌器中氣泡的分散混閤過程提供理論依據。模擬結果錶明,在 RS 中流體大緻呈週嚮流動,且剪切速率分佈相對較為均勻,較高剪切速率不僅齣現在轉子到壁麵的徑嚮間隙處,而且齣現在轉子與定子之間的軸嚮間隙處;而在 CF 中,流體呈現較為明顯的鏇轉流動,且剪切速率分佈沒有RS均勻,較高的剪切速率隻齣現在葉輪與壁麵的徑嚮間隙處。在相同轉速下,雖然這2種攪拌器所形成的平均剪切速率差彆不大,但CF中所形成的最大剪切速率大于RS,這也意味著相同操作條件下CF中所能形成的氣泡呎吋更小,這與實驗結果是一緻的。對于這2種攪拌器,在層流區功率準數與攪拌雷諾數都成反比,且CFD模擬計算得到的結果與根據實驗得到的關聯式的結果基本一緻。然而CF的功率消耗高于RS的功率消耗。
채용계산류체역학모의방법대2충용우분산혼합과정적고전절교반기적류동특성진행연구분석,분별시전자정자교반기(RS)화다급협륜식교반부(CF)。본문종류장세절화공솔소모방면대기진행고찰연구,종이위해석교반기중기포적분산혼합과정제공이론의거。모의결과표명,재 RS 중류체대치정주향류동,차전절속솔분포상대교위균균,교고전절속솔불부출현재전자도벽면적경향간극처,이차출현재전자여정자지간적축향간극처;이재 CF 중,류체정현교위명현적선전류동,차전절속솔분포몰유RS균균,교고적전절속솔지출현재협륜여벽면적경향간극처。재상동전속하,수연저2충교반기소형성적평균전절속솔차별불대,단CF중소형성적최대전절속솔대우RS,저야의미착상동조작조건하CF중소능형성적기포척촌경소,저여실험결과시일치적。대우저2충교반기,재층류구공솔준수여교반뢰낙수도성반비,차CFD모의계산득도적결과여근거실험득도적관련식적결과기본일치。연이CF적공솔소모고우RS적공솔소모。
CFD simulations were carried out to investigate two types of high shear mixer for aerated process, i.e. multistage rotor stator (RS) and multi-impeller stirred column (CF). Flow field details and power consumption were obtained for high viscosity Newtonian fluids in laminar condition. Circulating flow was observed in RS whereas swirl flow dominated in CF. Strain rate distribution in RS was more uniform than that in CF. In RS, the higher strain rate occurred not only in radial clearance between rotors and vessel wall but also axial gap between rotors and stators while in CF the higher strain rate occurred only in the gap between impellers and vessel wall. Although there was little difference between the average strain rates generated, the maximum strain rate in CF was higher than that in RS, which indicates that smaller bubbles could be obtained in CF. This was consistent with experiments. Relationship between Power number and Reynolds number in both devices was obtained for Newtonian fluids from CFD simulation, showing good agreement with the experimental studies. However, CF consumes more power than RS.