CAJ | 학술논문

目的：研究两种采血方法在血液常规检验中的临床数据对比。方法选取我院88例正常人群进行血常规检验，分为研究组与对照组各44例，对照组给予末梢采血方法，研究组给予静脉采血方法，观察两组红细胞、血红蛋白、白细胞、红细胞比容、血小板、红细胞血红蛋白浓度的数据进行对比。结果两组患者血红蛋白、红细胞、血小板、红细胞比容以及白细胞数据对比显示，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论两种血液采集方法对比分析，采用静脉采血方式对患者血液进行采集检测，效果较好，可以准确的反映出血细胞数据，具备较强的医学根据。
목적：연구량충채혈방법재혈액상규검험중적림상수거대비。방법선취아원88례정상인군진행혈상규검험，분위연구조여대조조각44례，대조조급여말소채혈방법，연구조급여정맥채혈방법，관찰량조홍세포、혈홍단백、백세포、홍세포비용、혈소판、홍세포혈홍단백농도적수거진행대비。결과량조환자혈홍단백、홍세포、혈소판、홍세포비용이급백세포수거대비현시，차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론량충혈액채집방법대비분석，채용정맥채혈방식대환자혈액진행채집검측，효과교호，가이준학적반영출혈세포수거，구비교강적의학근거。
Objective To analyse two methods of blood in the blood routine inspection of clinical data.Methods Choose 88 cases of normal blood routine inspection, divided into research group and the control group (n=44), the control group given method of peripheral blood,the team give venous sampling method, compared two groups of red blood cells, hemoglobin, white blood cells, red blood cellvolume, platelets, red blood cellhemoglobin.Results Two groups of patients with hemoglobin, red blood cells, platelets, red blood cellvolume, and white blood cells, according to the data contrast difference was statistical y significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Comparative analysis of the two methods of blood col ection of the patient's blood by way of venous blood col ection, effect is good, can accurately reflect bleeding celldata, have stronger medicine according to Abservation..