胃肠病学
胃腸病學
위장병학
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
2014年
9期
527-530
,共4页
谭玉勇%刘德良%霍继荣%刘小娟%张洁%周芝元
譚玉勇%劉德良%霍繼榮%劉小娟%張潔%週芝元
담옥용%류덕량%곽계영%류소연%장길%주지원
贲门失弛缓症%经口内镜下肌切开术%治疗结果%安全%回顾性研究
賁門失弛緩癥%經口內鏡下肌切開術%治療結果%安全%迴顧性研究
분문실이완증%경구내경하기절개술%치료결과%안전%회고성연구
Esophageal Achalasia%Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy%Treatment Outcome%Safety%Retrospective Studies
背景:经口内镜下肌切开术( POEM)是治疗贲门失弛缓症( EA)的新技术,已有研究证实该法治疗EA可行、安全、有效,但关于术中全层肌切开与环肌切开疗效差异的报道尚少。目的:探讨POEM治疗EA的疗效和安全性。方法:2011年8月至2013年11月中南大学湘雅二医院收治EA患者216例,行POEM治疗,其中全层肌切开133例,环肌切开83例。术后对患者进行定期随访和复查,观察手术前后Eckardt评分和食管直径改变、术中、术后并发症发生情况和复发率,并比较全层肌切开与环肌切开疗效有无差异。结果:216例患者均成功实施POEM,操作时间平均为59.1 min,隧道长度平均为13.3 cm,肌切开长度平均为10.1 cm。术后患者症状均得到缓解,Eckardt评分较术前显著改善,术后6个月食管直径较术前显著缩小(53.7 mm对30.8 mm,P<0.001),并发症发生率为13.0%(28/216)。患者术后随访3~30个月(平均13.8个月),有效率为99.1%(214/216),随访期内无一例复发病例。全层肌切开与环肌切开相比,操作时间、有效率和并发症发生率差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05)。结论:POEM可作为EA安全、有效的治疗手段;全层肌切开并不增加手术操作时间和手术相关并发症,但其远期疗效和并发症仍有待进一步随访评估。
揹景:經口內鏡下肌切開術( POEM)是治療賁門失弛緩癥( EA)的新技術,已有研究證實該法治療EA可行、安全、有效,但關于術中全層肌切開與環肌切開療效差異的報道尚少。目的:探討POEM治療EA的療效和安全性。方法:2011年8月至2013年11月中南大學湘雅二醫院收治EA患者216例,行POEM治療,其中全層肌切開133例,環肌切開83例。術後對患者進行定期隨訪和複查,觀察手術前後Eckardt評分和食管直徑改變、術中、術後併髮癥髮生情況和複髮率,併比較全層肌切開與環肌切開療效有無差異。結果:216例患者均成功實施POEM,操作時間平均為59.1 min,隧道長度平均為13.3 cm,肌切開長度平均為10.1 cm。術後患者癥狀均得到緩解,Eckardt評分較術前顯著改善,術後6箇月食管直徑較術前顯著縮小(53.7 mm對30.8 mm,P<0.001),併髮癥髮生率為13.0%(28/216)。患者術後隨訪3~30箇月(平均13.8箇月),有效率為99.1%(214/216),隨訪期內無一例複髮病例。全層肌切開與環肌切開相比,操作時間、有效率和併髮癥髮生率差異均無統計學意義( P>0.05)。結論:POEM可作為EA安全、有效的治療手段;全層肌切開併不增加手術操作時間和手術相關併髮癥,但其遠期療效和併髮癥仍有待進一步隨訪評估。
배경:경구내경하기절개술( POEM)시치료분문실이완증( EA)적신기술,이유연구증실해법치료EA가행、안전、유효,단관우술중전층기절개여배기절개료효차이적보도상소。목적:탐토POEM치료EA적료효화안전성。방법:2011년8월지2013년11월중남대학상아이의원수치EA환자216례,행POEM치료,기중전층기절개133례,배기절개83례。술후대환자진행정기수방화복사,관찰수술전후Eckardt평분화식관직경개변、술중、술후병발증발생정황화복발솔,병비교전층기절개여배기절개료효유무차이。결과:216례환자균성공실시POEM,조작시간평균위59.1 min,수도장도평균위13.3 cm,기절개장도평균위10.1 cm。술후환자증상균득도완해,Eckardt평분교술전현저개선,술후6개월식관직경교술전현저축소(53.7 mm대30.8 mm,P<0.001),병발증발생솔위13.0%(28/216)。환자술후수방3~30개월(평균13.8개월),유효솔위99.1%(214/216),수방기내무일례복발병례。전층기절개여배기절개상비,조작시간、유효솔화병발증발생솔차이균무통계학의의( P>0.05)。결론:POEM가작위EA안전、유효적치료수단;전층기절개병불증가수술조작시간화수술상관병발증,단기원기료효화병발증잉유대진일보수방평고。
Background:There have been several studies about peroral endoscopic myotomy( POEM)for treating esophageal achalasia( EA). Although the feasibility,safety and effectiveness of POEM have been demonstrated,comparative studies of full-thickness and circular muscle myotomy were rare. Aims:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of POEM for treating patients with EA. Methods:A total of 216 patients with EA admitted from Aug. 2011 to Nov. 2013 at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University were treated with POEM,of whom 133 received full-thickness myotomy and 83 received circular muscle myotomy. Data about Eckardt ’s score, diameter of esophageal lumen, intra- and post-operative complications and recurrence before and/or during periodical follow-up were collected,and the efficacy of full-thickness and circular muscle myotomy was compared. Results:All the 216 patients successfully underwent POEM with an average operation time of 59. 1 minutes. Average length of tunnel and myotomy were 13. 3 cm and 10. 1 cm,respectively. Symptoms remitted in all of the 216 patients,Eckardt’s score decreased significantly,diameter of esophageal lumen was reduced(pre-treatment vs. 6 months after treatment,53. 7 mm vs. 30. 8 mm,P<0. 001),and complications occurred in 13. 0%(28/216)of the cases. Success treatment was achieved in 99. 1%(214/216)of the cases with a follow-up of 3-30 months( mean 13. 8 months),no recurrence was noted. The operation time,efficacy and complications were comparable between full-thickness and circular muscle myotomy(P>0. 05). Conclusions:POEM is an effective and safe method for treating EA. Full-thickness myotomy did not increase the operation time and procedure-related complications, however,its long-term efficacy and complications need to be further assessed.