热带病与寄生虫学
熱帶病與寄生蟲學
열대병여기생충학
TROPICAL DISEASES AND PARASITOLOGY
2014年
3期
152-154
,共3页
张勇%宋维胜%张西才%张金何
張勇%宋維勝%張西纔%張金何
장용%송유성%장서재%장금하
疟疾%快速诊断试剂盒%镜检法
瘧疾%快速診斷試劑盒%鏡檢法
학질%쾌속진단시제합%경검법
Malaria%Rapid diagnostic test%Microscopy method
目的:探讨疟疾快速诊断试剂盒临床应用效果,为临床应用提供参考。方法快速诊断试剂盒与镜检法对103例疟疾、疑似疟疾进行检测对比分析。结果镜检疟原虫阳性23例(Pf 11例、Pv 10例、Pm和Po各1例),阳性率22.33%;快速诊断试剂盒检测疟原虫阳性22例(Pf 11例、Pv 10例、Pm 1例),阳性率21.36%,卵形疟未检出。两方法检出阳性率无统计学意义(χ2=0.33,P>0.05)。该试剂的总灵敏性95.65%,总特异性97.50%,阳性预测值91.67%,阴性预测值98.73%,漏检率4.35%,误诊率2.50%。结论疟疾快速诊断试剂盒具有良好的疟疾诊断效果和简便、快速等优点,非常适合镜检技术和条件不足的基层医疗、预防机构开展疟疾检测。
目的:探討瘧疾快速診斷試劑盒臨床應用效果,為臨床應用提供參攷。方法快速診斷試劑盒與鏡檢法對103例瘧疾、疑似瘧疾進行檢測對比分析。結果鏡檢瘧原蟲暘性23例(Pf 11例、Pv 10例、Pm和Po各1例),暘性率22.33%;快速診斷試劑盒檢測瘧原蟲暘性22例(Pf 11例、Pv 10例、Pm 1例),暘性率21.36%,卵形瘧未檢齣。兩方法檢齣暘性率無統計學意義(χ2=0.33,P>0.05)。該試劑的總靈敏性95.65%,總特異性97.50%,暘性預測值91.67%,陰性預測值98.73%,漏檢率4.35%,誤診率2.50%。結論瘧疾快速診斷試劑盒具有良好的瘧疾診斷效果和簡便、快速等優點,非常適閤鏡檢技術和條件不足的基層醫療、預防機構開展瘧疾檢測。
목적:탐토학질쾌속진단시제합림상응용효과,위림상응용제공삼고。방법쾌속진단시제합여경검법대103례학질、의사학질진행검측대비분석。결과경검학원충양성23례(Pf 11례、Pv 10례、Pm화Po각1례),양성솔22.33%;쾌속진단시제합검측학원충양성22례(Pf 11례、Pv 10례、Pm 1례),양성솔21.36%,란형학미검출。량방법검출양성솔무통계학의의(χ2=0.33,P>0.05)。해시제적총령민성95.65%,총특이성97.50%,양성예측치91.67%,음성예측치98.73%,루검솔4.35%,오진솔2.50%。결론학질쾌속진단시제합구유량호적학질진단효과화간편、쾌속등우점,비상괄합경검기술화조건불족적기층의료、예방궤구개전학질검측。
Objective To probe the effect of rapid diagnostic test in the diagnosis of malaria, and pro-vide reference for clinical application. Methods 103 suspicious cases of malaria were checked with rapid diag-nostic test and microscopy method. Results 23 positive cases were detected by microscopy method (Pf 11 cas-es, Pv 10 cases, Pm and Po 1 case each) with positive rate of 22.33%, and 22 positive cases were detected by rapid diagnostic test (Pf 11 cases, Pv 10 cases, Pm 1 case) with positive rate of 21.36%. One Po case was not detected by rapid diagnostic test. There was no significant difference between the two methods (χ2=0.33, P>0.05). The sensitivity of the rapid diagnostic test was 95.65%, with the specificity of 97.5%, the positive predic-tive value of 91.67%, the negative predictive value of 98.73%, the missing rate of 4.35%, and the misdiagnosis rate of 2.50%. Conclusion The rapid diagnostic test had good effect on the diagnosis of malaria with advan-tage of simple and fast, and very suitable for grass-roots level medical treatment and disease prevention units which have insufficient microscopy equipment and techniques to carry out the diagnosis of malaria.