山东医学高等专科学校学报
山東醫學高等專科學校學報
산동의학고등전과학교학보
JOURNAL OF SHANDONG MEDICAL COLLEGE
2014年
5期
339-342
,共4页
Ⅰ类切口手术%围手术期%抗菌药物%药学服务%行政干预
Ⅰ類切口手術%圍手術期%抗菌藥物%藥學服務%行政榦預
Ⅰ류절구수술%위수술기%항균약물%약학복무%행정간예
TypeⅠincision%Perioperative period%Antibiotics%Pharmaceutical care%Administrative intervention
目的:探索药学服务和行政干预在Ⅰ类切口手术围手术期预防性使用抗菌药物的实施效果。方法以随机抽样法调取干预前(2012年1月~2012年10月)和干预后(2012年12月~2013年9月)Ⅰ类切口手术出院病历各1000份,对比分析干预前、后Ⅰ类切口手术围手术期预防性使用抗菌药物的合理性。结果抗菌药物预防性使用率从干预前的54.4%下降为干预后的48.20%( P <0.05),品种选择合理率从干预前的81.74%上升为干预后的90.19%( P <0.05),用药时机合理率从干预前的78.49%上升为干预后的89.91%( P <0.05),使用疗程合理率从干预前的42.94%上升为干预后的65.97%( P <0.05),联合用药比率从干预前的3.24%下降为干预后的0( P <0.05)。结论综合干预管理措施可行、有效,可以著提高Ⅰ类切口围手术期抗菌药物合理用药水平。
目的:探索藥學服務和行政榦預在Ⅰ類切口手術圍手術期預防性使用抗菌藥物的實施效果。方法以隨機抽樣法調取榦預前(2012年1月~2012年10月)和榦預後(2012年12月~2013年9月)Ⅰ類切口手術齣院病歷各1000份,對比分析榦預前、後Ⅰ類切口手術圍手術期預防性使用抗菌藥物的閤理性。結果抗菌藥物預防性使用率從榦預前的54.4%下降為榦預後的48.20%( P <0.05),品種選擇閤理率從榦預前的81.74%上升為榦預後的90.19%( P <0.05),用藥時機閤理率從榦預前的78.49%上升為榦預後的89.91%( P <0.05),使用療程閤理率從榦預前的42.94%上升為榦預後的65.97%( P <0.05),聯閤用藥比率從榦預前的3.24%下降為榦預後的0( P <0.05)。結論綜閤榦預管理措施可行、有效,可以著提高Ⅰ類切口圍手術期抗菌藥物閤理用藥水平。
목적:탐색약학복무화행정간예재Ⅰ류절구수술위수술기예방성사용항균약물적실시효과。방법이수궤추양법조취간예전(2012년1월~2012년10월)화간예후(2012년12월~2013년9월)Ⅰ류절구수술출원병력각1000빈,대비분석간예전、후Ⅰ류절구수술위수술기예방성사용항균약물적합이성。결과항균약물예방성사용솔종간예전적54.4%하강위간예후적48.20%( P <0.05),품충선택합리솔종간예전적81.74%상승위간예후적90.19%( P <0.05),용약시궤합리솔종간예전적78.49%상승위간예후적89.91%( P <0.05),사용료정합리솔종간예전적42.94%상승위간예후적65.97%( P <0.05),연합용약비솔종간예전적3.24%하강위간예후적0( P <0.05)。결론종합간예관리조시가행、유효,가이저제고Ⅰ류절구위수술기항균약물합리용약수평。
Objective To explore the effect of the comprehensive intervention in prophylactic use of anti-biotics during perioperative period of Type Ⅰ incision . T he rationality of the prophylactic application of antibiotics in Type I incision before and after pharma-ceutical care and administrative intervention was com-pared and analyzed by studying 1000 copies of medical record of patients receiving Type I incision in this hos-pital from January to October , 2012 before interven-tions and from December ,2012 to September ,2013) after interventions .Methods By a random sampling method ,the medical records of patients undergoing Ⅰ incision operations were collected from Jan .2012 to Oct .2012 (before intervention ,1000 cases) and from Dec .2012 to Sep .2013 (after intervention ,1000 cases) for statistical analysis .The rationality of the prophylactic application of antibiotics was compared before and after the intervention .Results After the comprehensive interventions ,the rate of prophylactic use of antibiotics decreased from 54 .4% to 48 .20% after intervention ( P <0 .05) ,the rate of reasonable variety selection increased from 81 .74% to 90 .19% after intervention( P <0 .05) ,the rate of reasonable medica-tion time increased from 78 .49% to 89 .91% after intervention( P <0 .05) ,the rate of the course of rea-sonable use of antibiotics increased from 42 .94% to 65 .97% after intervention ( P <0 .05) and the rate of combined use of drug decreased from 3 .24% to 0 after intervention ( P <0 .05) .Conclusion The compre-hensive intervention is feasible and can promote the preventive effect of using antibiotics during periopera-tive period .