CAJ | 학술논문

将108例面部脂溢性角化病患者随机分为3组,分别用Q开关Nd：YAG 532 nm激光、铒激光和强脉冲光( IPL)治疗,根据患者每次治疗前的照片评估治疗效果及不良反应。结果显示3种治疗方法停工期比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),IPL组优于Q开关532 nm激光组及铒激光组；患者疼痛度的比较差异无统计学意义；3种治疗方法均安全有效,有效率和术后局部色素改变比较差异均无统计学意义。
장108례면부지일성각화병환자수궤분위3조,분별용Q개관Nd：YAG 532 nm격광、이격광화강맥충광( IPL)치료,근거환자매차치료전적조편평고치료효과급불량반응。결과현시3충치료방법정공기비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),IPL조우우Q개관532 nm격광조급이격광조；환자동통도적비교차이무통계학의의；3충치료방법균안전유효,유효솔화술후국부색소개변비교차이균무통계학의의。
108 patients with facial seborrheic keratosis were randomly divided into three groups,which were treated with Q-switched Nd:YAG 532 nm laser,erbium laser and intense pulsed light respectively. The assessment of effect and adverse reactions were based on the photos before each treatment. Three methods of treatment of downtime comparative difference was statistically significant. Intense pulsed light group was better than that of Q-switched 532 nm and erbium laser group. There was no statistically significant difference compared with the patients pain degrees. Three methods were safe and effective treatment. Efficient and postoperative local pigment change comparative differences had no statistical significance.