安徽医科大学学报
安徽醫科大學學報
안휘의과대학학보
ACTA UNIVERSITY MEDICINALIS ANHUI
2014年
9期
1325-1328,1356
,共5页
陈莹莹%曾庆曙%杨明珍%王永庆%夏海龙%江慧敏%安福润
陳瑩瑩%曾慶曙%楊明珍%王永慶%夏海龍%江慧敏%安福潤
진형형%증경서%양명진%왕영경%하해룡%강혜민%안복윤
慢性髓系白血病%伊马替尼%危险度分层
慢性髓繫白血病%伊馬替尼%危險度分層
만성수계백혈병%이마체니%위험도분층
chronic myeloid leukemia%imatinib%risk stratification
目的重点分析伊马替尼治疗慢性髓系白血病( CML)慢性期的临床疗效与危险度分层之间的相互关系。方法对98例 CML 慢性期患者,服用伊马替尼前通过Sokal评分、Hasford评分进行危险度分层,比较不同组间的临床疗效是否具有统计学意义。结果98例患者中,3个月达到血液学缓解( CHR)、部分细胞遗传学缓解( PCyR)的占97.8%及86.4%,6个月达到完全细胞遗传学缓解( CCyR)的比例占82.9%,12个月达到分子学缓解( MMR)的比例占54.5%。入组患者均根据Sokal评分计算危险度分层,服药3个月后低危组、中危组及高危组达到PCyR的比例分别为94.4%、82.6%、66.7%( P=0.104),6个月低危组、中危组及高危组达到CCyR的比例分别为88.2%、76.9%、100.0%(P=0.319),12个月低危组、中危组达到MMR的比例分别为52.4%、65.0%( P=0.412)。根据入组患者服用伊马替尼前情况,有46例患者进行了Hasford分层,低危组21例、中危组23例,高危组2例,3个月达到PCyR的比例分别为90.5%、91.3%、50.0%(P=0.191),随访到6个月,低危组、中危组及高危组达到CCyR的比例分别为83.3%、94.4%、100.0%(P=0.528),随访到12个月,低危组及中危组达到MMR的比例分别为45.5%、58.3%( P=0.842)。结论伊马替尼治疗CML疗效好,低、中危组比高危组更易获得较好的疗效,且坚持足量应用更易获得较好的疗效。
目的重點分析伊馬替尼治療慢性髓繫白血病( CML)慢性期的臨床療效與危險度分層之間的相互關繫。方法對98例 CML 慢性期患者,服用伊馬替尼前通過Sokal評分、Hasford評分進行危險度分層,比較不同組間的臨床療效是否具有統計學意義。結果98例患者中,3箇月達到血液學緩解( CHR)、部分細胞遺傳學緩解( PCyR)的佔97.8%及86.4%,6箇月達到完全細胞遺傳學緩解( CCyR)的比例佔82.9%,12箇月達到分子學緩解( MMR)的比例佔54.5%。入組患者均根據Sokal評分計算危險度分層,服藥3箇月後低危組、中危組及高危組達到PCyR的比例分彆為94.4%、82.6%、66.7%( P=0.104),6箇月低危組、中危組及高危組達到CCyR的比例分彆為88.2%、76.9%、100.0%(P=0.319),12箇月低危組、中危組達到MMR的比例分彆為52.4%、65.0%( P=0.412)。根據入組患者服用伊馬替尼前情況,有46例患者進行瞭Hasford分層,低危組21例、中危組23例,高危組2例,3箇月達到PCyR的比例分彆為90.5%、91.3%、50.0%(P=0.191),隨訪到6箇月,低危組、中危組及高危組達到CCyR的比例分彆為83.3%、94.4%、100.0%(P=0.528),隨訪到12箇月,低危組及中危組達到MMR的比例分彆為45.5%、58.3%( P=0.842)。結論伊馬替尼治療CML療效好,低、中危組比高危組更易穫得較好的療效,且堅持足量應用更易穫得較好的療效。
목적중점분석이마체니치료만성수계백혈병( CML)만성기적림상료효여위험도분층지간적상호관계。방법대98례 CML 만성기환자,복용이마체니전통과Sokal평분、Hasford평분진행위험도분층,비교불동조간적림상료효시부구유통계학의의。결과98례환자중,3개월체도혈액학완해( CHR)、부분세포유전학완해( PCyR)적점97.8%급86.4%,6개월체도완전세포유전학완해( CCyR)적비례점82.9%,12개월체도분자학완해( MMR)적비례점54.5%。입조환자균근거Sokal평분계산위험도분층,복약3개월후저위조、중위조급고위조체도PCyR적비례분별위94.4%、82.6%、66.7%( P=0.104),6개월저위조、중위조급고위조체도CCyR적비례분별위88.2%、76.9%、100.0%(P=0.319),12개월저위조、중위조체도MMR적비례분별위52.4%、65.0%( P=0.412)。근거입조환자복용이마체니전정황,유46례환자진행료Hasford분층,저위조21례、중위조23례,고위조2례,3개월체도PCyR적비례분별위90.5%、91.3%、50.0%(P=0.191),수방도6개월,저위조、중위조급고위조체도CCyR적비례분별위83.3%、94.4%、100.0%(P=0.528),수방도12개월,저위조급중위조체도MMR적비례분별위45.5%、58.3%( P=0.842)。결론이마체니치료CML료효호,저、중위조비고위조경역획득교호적료효,차견지족량응용경역획득교호적료효。
Objective To analyse the relationship between the clinical efficacy of imatinib treatment on chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phaseand risk stratification. Methods 98 imatinib-treated patients were enrolled, and before taking imatinib Sokal and Hasford score were used to assess risk stratification to compare if it has statistical significance between different groups. Results In the 98 cases, 89 cases (97.8%) achieved complete hematologic remission(CHR),76 cases(86.4%) achieved partial cytogenetic remission(PCyR) after three months, 63 cases (82.9%) achieved complete cytogenetic response(CCyR) after six months and 24 cases(54.5%) achieved major molecular response ( MMR ) after twelve months. Risk stratification was assessed according to Sokal score. After three months the rate of groups at low, intermediate and high risk categories which achieved PCyR were 94.4%, 82.6% and 66.7%, respectively(P=0.104), after six months the rate of different groups which achieved CCyR were 88.2%,76.9% and 100%, respectively(P=0.319), and after twelve months the rate of different groups at low and intermediate risk categories which achieved MMR were 52.4% and 65.0%( P=0.412 ).According to the patients' condition, before taking imatinib,46 patients were stratified by Hasford, among which 21 at low risk cate-gorie,23 at intermediate risk categorie and 2 at high risk categorie.After three months the rate of groups at low, in-termediate and high risk categories which achieved PCyR were 90.5%, 91.3% and 50%, respectively ( P =0.191),after six months the rate of different groups which achieved CCyR were 83.3%,94.4% and 100%,respec-tively(P=0.528),and after twelve months the rate of different groups at low and intermediate risk categories which achieved MMR were 45.5% and 58.3% ( P=0.842 ) . Conclusion Imatinib mesylate treatment of chronic mye-loid leukemia is good. Patients belonged to low and intermediate risk groups are more likely to get better clinical ef-ficacy than the high-risk group, and insisted on enough applications are easier to achieve nice clinical efficacy.