CAJ | 학술논문

目的：分析与研究临床免疫检验的质量控制方法与重要性。方法对我院2012年3月~2013年8月收治的32例患者临床资料进行回顾性分析，取32例患者的免疫检验血样，共32份；按照时间顺序将32例患者划分为研究组与对照组，两组各16份免疫检验血样。对照徐行常规免疫检验，研究组行质量质控免疫检验；对比两组患者的 CEA、CA199、Ca125、C-肽以及AFP。结果研究组CEA、CA199、Ca125、C-肽以及AFP的平均变异指数明显低于对照组，两组差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论加强临床免疫检验中质量控制，有利于免疫检验结果的准确性、真实性以及可靠性的提升，以此为临床诊疗提供有效、合理的参考依据。
목적：분석여연구림상면역검험적질량공제방법여중요성。방법대아원2012년3월~2013년8월수치적32례환자림상자료진행회고성분석，취32례환자적면역검험혈양，공32빈；안조시간순서장32례환자화분위연구조여대조조，량조각16빈면역검험혈양。대조서행상규면역검험，연구조행질량질공면역검험；대비량조환자적 CEA、CA199、Ca125、C-태이급AFP。결과연구조CEA、CA199、Ca125、C-태이급AFP적평균변이지수명현저우대조조，량조차이구유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론가강림상면역검험중질량공제，유리우면역검험결과적준학성、진실성이급가고성적제승，이차위림상진료제공유효、합리적삼고의거。
Objective To analyze and study the quality control of clinical immunology test methods and importance. Methods In our hospital during March 2012 to August 2012 clinical data of 32 cases of patients were analyzed retrospectively,in 32 patients with immune test blood samples,a total of 32;According to the time order to 32 patients were divided into research group and the control group,two groups of 16 each immunity test blood samples.Contrast to crawl routine immunization test,the team line quality quality control immune inspection;Comparison of two groups of patients with CEA,CA199,Ca125,c-peptide and AFP.Results The team the CEA,CA199,Ca125,c-peptide and AFP average variation index is significantly lower than the control group,the dif erences between the two groups have statistical significance (P<0.05).Conclusion To strengthen the quality control in clinical immunity test,which is beneficial to the immune the accuracy,authenticity and reliability of the test results of ascension,for reference of clinical diagnosis and treatment to provide ef ective and reasonable.