中华耳科学杂志
中華耳科學雜誌
중화이과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY
2014年
3期
435-437
,共3页
张锐宁%马龙%霍云峰%张奋龙%冀飞
張銳寧%馬龍%霍雲峰%張奮龍%冀飛
장예저%마룡%곽운봉%장강룡%기비
听性脑干反应%听觉电生理%老年性聋%高龄老人
聽性腦榦反應%聽覺電生理%老年性聾%高齡老人
은성뇌간반응%은각전생리%노년성롱%고령노인
Auditory electrophysiology%Auditory brainstem response%Presbycusis
目的:分析90岁以上老年性聋患者听性脑干反应(ABR)的特征。方法对14例90岁以上老年性聋患者(平均年龄91.1.4±1.3岁,26耳)进行交替短声ABR测试。听力正常人9例(平均年龄22.7±1.2岁,18耳)作为对照组。观测Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ波的峰潜伏期(Peak Latency,PL)和Ⅰ-Ⅲ、Ⅲ-Ⅴ、Ⅰ-Ⅴ波间期(Inter-Peak Latency,IPL),并分别与对照组总体均数进行比较。结果总体的I波引出率和III波引出率均为76.9%(20/26),V波引出率为84.6%(22/26)。高龄老年性聋组各波PL较对照组延长。Ⅰ-Ⅲ波IPL、Ⅲ-Ⅴ波IPL、Ⅰ-Ⅴ波IPL无组间统计学差异。结论90岁以上高龄老年性聋患者ABR波形分化较差。
目的:分析90歲以上老年性聾患者聽性腦榦反應(ABR)的特徵。方法對14例90歲以上老年性聾患者(平均年齡91.1.4±1.3歲,26耳)進行交替短聲ABR測試。聽力正常人9例(平均年齡22.7±1.2歲,18耳)作為對照組。觀測Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ波的峰潛伏期(Peak Latency,PL)和Ⅰ-Ⅲ、Ⅲ-Ⅴ、Ⅰ-Ⅴ波間期(Inter-Peak Latency,IPL),併分彆與對照組總體均數進行比較。結果總體的I波引齣率和III波引齣率均為76.9%(20/26),V波引齣率為84.6%(22/26)。高齡老年性聾組各波PL較對照組延長。Ⅰ-Ⅲ波IPL、Ⅲ-Ⅴ波IPL、Ⅰ-Ⅴ波IPL無組間統計學差異。結論90歲以上高齡老年性聾患者ABR波形分化較差。
목적:분석90세이상노년성롱환자은성뇌간반응(ABR)적특정。방법대14례90세이상노년성롱환자(평균년령91.1.4±1.3세,26이)진행교체단성ABR측시。은력정상인9례(평균년령22.7±1.2세,18이)작위대조조。관측Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ파적봉잠복기(Peak Latency,PL)화Ⅰ-Ⅲ、Ⅲ-Ⅴ、Ⅰ-Ⅴ파간기(Inter-Peak Latency,IPL),병분별여대조조총체균수진행비교。결과총체적I파인출솔화III파인출솔균위76.9%(20/26),V파인출솔위84.6%(22/26)。고령노년성롱조각파PL교대조조연장。Ⅰ-Ⅲ파IPL、Ⅲ-Ⅴ파IPL、Ⅰ-Ⅴ파IPL무조간통계학차이。결론90세이상고령노년성롱환자ABR파형분화교차。
Objective To obtain the characteristics of auditory brainstem response (ABR) in senile patietns elder than 90 years. Methods Fourteen presbycusis patietns elder than 90 years (91.1±1.3 years, 26 ears) and 9 normal-hearing adults ( 22.7±1.2 years, 18 ears) were included in the study. ABRs were recorded in both groups by alternative clicks. The peak laten-cy (PL) of wave Ⅰ, Ⅲ, and Ⅴ, and the inter-peak latency (IPL) of Ⅰ-Ⅲ, Ⅲ-Ⅴ, and Ⅰ-Ⅴ were compared between groups. Results In 76.9%(20/26) of senile ears, wave I of ABRs were present, in 76.9%(20/26) of them, wave I of ABRs were present, and in 84.6%(22/26) of them, waveⅤwere present. For the senile group, the peak latencies ofⅠ,Ⅲ,Ⅴwere statistically longer than those of control group. There was no statistical difference between groups in the IPL of waveⅠ-Ⅲ, waveⅢ-Ⅴand waveⅠ-Ⅴ. Conclusion Worse ABR wave differentiation were found in senile patients over 90 years.