中南大学学报（社会科学版）
中南大學學報（社會科學版）
중남대학학보（사회과학판）
JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE)
2014年
5期
119-125
,共7页
裁判诚信%“彭宇案”%民诉法诚信原则条款%适用性%间接适用%直接适用
裁判誠信%“彭宇案”%民訴法誠信原則條款%適用性%間接適用%直接適用
재판성신%“팽우안”%민소법성신원칙조관%괄용성%간접괄용%직접괄용
judicial integrity%“Peng Yu case”%good faith principle article in civil procedure law%applicability%indirect applicability%direct applicability
“彭宇案”折射了社会的诚信危机和对裁判诚信的期待。《民诉法》第13条第1款诚信原则对法院和法官的“适用性”，包括法律宣示意义上的间接适用与裁判援引意义上的直接适用：前者毋庸置疑但不宜滥用，后者看似很美然功能有限。裁判诚信要求依法尽职裁判、禁止突袭裁判和不得滥用自由裁量权；民诉法诚信原则条款对法院和法官具有诚信引导、解决民诉法“体系违反”、衡平各方诉讼利益、事后惩戒等功能。裁判诚信的本质，是依照法律和程序，在遵循法律原则适用即衡平方法前提下的依良心审判。
“彭宇案”摺射瞭社會的誠信危機和對裁判誠信的期待。《民訴法》第13條第1款誠信原則對法院和法官的“適用性”，包括法律宣示意義上的間接適用與裁判援引意義上的直接適用：前者毌庸置疑但不宜濫用，後者看似很美然功能有限。裁判誠信要求依法儘職裁判、禁止突襲裁判和不得濫用自由裁量權；民訴法誠信原則條款對法院和法官具有誠信引導、解決民訴法“體繫違反”、衡平各方訴訟利益、事後懲戒等功能。裁判誠信的本質，是依照法律和程序，在遵循法律原則適用即衡平方法前提下的依良心審判。
“팽우안”절사료사회적성신위궤화대재판성신적기대。《민소법》제13조제1관성신원칙대법원화법관적“괄용성”，포괄법률선시의의상적간접괄용여재판원인의의상적직접괄용：전자무용치의단불의람용，후자간사흔미연공능유한。재판성신요구의법진직재판、금지돌습재판화불득람용자유재량권；민소법성신원칙조관대법원화법관구유성신인도、해결민소법“체계위반”、형평각방소송이익、사후징계등공능。재판성신적본질，시의조법률화정서，재준순법률원칙괄용즉형평방법전제하적의양심심판。
The “Peng Yu case” reflects the social good faith crisis and the requirements for judicial integrity. The“applicability” of the principle of good faith on the conduct of the court and judge of Article 13, paragraph 1 of our“Civil Procedure Law” includes the indirect applicability in the sense of law declaration and the direct applicability in the sense of referee quotation: the former is sure but should not be abused, which the latter appears to be very beautiful but with limited functions. The judicial integrity requires due diligence trial according to law, the prohibition of raid trail and the abuse to discretion. The good faith principle of civil procedure has the functions of the orientation of judicial integrity, the integrity resolution of the trial conduct of Civil Procedure “system violates”, the integrity of the interests balance of the parties and the second discipline of dishonest conduct of the trial. By their very nature, judicial integrity is conscientious trail in compliance with due process and the method of applicability of good faith principle.
