中华普通外科学文献(电子版)
中華普通外科學文獻(電子版)
중화보통외과학문헌(전자판)
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GENERAL SURGERY(ELECTRONIC VERSION)
2014年
5期
386-389
,共4页
张红卫%陈亚进%李闻达%黄泽坚
張紅衛%陳亞進%李聞達%黃澤堅
장홍위%진아진%리문체%황택견
腹腔镜%胆管切开术%一期缝合%高龄
腹腔鏡%膽管切開術%一期縫閤%高齡
복강경%담관절개술%일기봉합%고령
Laparoscopy%Choledochotomy%Primary closure%Elder patients
目的:探讨腹腔镜下胆管切开取石后一期缝合胆管而不放置胆管引流在高龄患者中的安全性和可行性。方法回顾性分析2007年1月至2012年10月接受腹腔镜下胆管切开取石后不放置胆管引流的高龄病例临床资料,共16例作为研究组,收集同时期接受腹腔镜下胆管切开取石不放置胆管引流管的非高龄病例20例作为对照组。对比分析两组患者的平均手术时间、住院时间、术后并发症情况等。结果两组患者术后均康复出院。研究组平均手术时间为(116.31±11.31)min,平均住院时间(10.19±1.22)d;而对照组平均手术时间为(106.80±10.58)min,平均住院时间(7.65±0.88)d;两组比较差异无统计学意义。两组均无胆漏、腹腔出血、膈下感染及术后阻塞性黄疸等术后并发症。两组的切口感染、肺部感染率和结石复发率差异无统计学意义。结论腹腔镜下胆管切开取石后一期缝合胆管而不放置胆管引流用于高龄患者是安全、可行的。
目的:探討腹腔鏡下膽管切開取石後一期縫閤膽管而不放置膽管引流在高齡患者中的安全性和可行性。方法迴顧性分析2007年1月至2012年10月接受腹腔鏡下膽管切開取石後不放置膽管引流的高齡病例臨床資料,共16例作為研究組,收集同時期接受腹腔鏡下膽管切開取石不放置膽管引流管的非高齡病例20例作為對照組。對比分析兩組患者的平均手術時間、住院時間、術後併髮癥情況等。結果兩組患者術後均康複齣院。研究組平均手術時間為(116.31±11.31)min,平均住院時間(10.19±1.22)d;而對照組平均手術時間為(106.80±10.58)min,平均住院時間(7.65±0.88)d;兩組比較差異無統計學意義。兩組均無膽漏、腹腔齣血、膈下感染及術後阻塞性黃疸等術後併髮癥。兩組的切口感染、肺部感染率和結石複髮率差異無統計學意義。結論腹腔鏡下膽管切開取石後一期縫閤膽管而不放置膽管引流用于高齡患者是安全、可行的。
목적:탐토복강경하담관절개취석후일기봉합담관이불방치담관인류재고령환자중적안전성화가행성。방법회고성분석2007년1월지2012년10월접수복강경하담관절개취석후불방치담관인류적고령병례림상자료,공16례작위연구조,수집동시기접수복강경하담관절개취석불방치담관인류관적비고령병례20례작위대조조。대비분석량조환자적평균수술시간、주원시간、술후병발증정황등。결과량조환자술후균강복출원。연구조평균수술시간위(116.31±11.31)min,평균주원시간(10.19±1.22)d;이대조조평균수술시간위(106.80±10.58)min,평균주원시간(7.65±0.88)d;량조비교차이무통계학의의。량조균무담루、복강출혈、격하감염급술후조새성황달등술후병발증。량조적절구감염、폐부감염솔화결석복발솔차이무통계학의의。결론복강경하담관절개취석후일기봉합담관이불방치담관인류용우고령환자시안전、가행적。
Objective To investigate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) with primary closure for management of choledocholithiasis in elder patients. Methods The clinical data of sixteen elder patients with choledocholithiasis who underwent primary closure of the common bile duct (without T-tube drainage) after LCBDE (group A) was compared with 20 non-elder patients who underwent the same procedure (group B). Both groups were evaluated with regard to operation time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Results The mean operation time was (116.31±11.31) minutes for group A and (106.80±10.58) minutes for group B;the hospital stay was (10.19±1.22) days for group A and (7.65±0.88) days for group B;both factors showed no significant difference. There were no bile leakage, abdominal bleeding, subphrenic infection and obstructive jaundice after operation in both groups. And there was no significant difference in incision infection, pulmonary infection and recurrence of stones in both groups. Conculsion It is safe and feasible for elder patients to have primary closure of the common bile duct without T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy.