CAJ | 학술논문

自新《刑事诉讼法》施行以来，人权保障思维导向日渐明显，保障人权与打击犯罪之间的逻辑顺序逐渐成为理论研究与司法实务探讨的重点。加强对于刑事诉讼活动中强制措施的监督十分关键，强制措施通常包括三类：对人身自由权的强制措施，对物的强制措施以及对公民隐私权的强制措施。我国目前法律仅明确规定了关于人身自由权的强制措施，其他强制措施仅仅只有侦查机关内部监督，而且监督方式较为单一，与英美法系和大陆法系相比较，我国强制措施监督方式有待进一步完善。
자신《형사소송법》시행이래，인권보장사유도향일점명현，보장인권여타격범죄지간적라집순서축점성위이론연구여사법실무탐토적중점。가강대우형사소송활동중강제조시적감독십분관건，강제조시통상포괄삼류：대인신자유권적강제조시，대물적강제조시이급대공민은사권적강제조시。아국목전법률부명학규정료관우인신자유권적강제조시，기타강제조시부부지유정사궤관내부감독，이차감독방식교위단일，여영미법계화대륙법계상비교，아국강제조시감독방식유대진일보완선。
Since the new Crime Procedure Law comes into force, human rights protection have been drawn more attention. The logical sequence of human rights protection and crime fight has become the focus in theoretical study and judicial practices. Based on this background, supervision of criminal compulsory measures becomes more important. There are three types of compulsory measures: relating to personal freedom, involving property rights, and relating to privacy right. Only compulsory measures relating to personal freedom are made clear in present Chinese laws, and the other two are supervised within investigation organs. Compared with the Anglo-American laws and Continental laws, the supervisory model of criminal compulsory measures in China has much to be improved.