CAJ | 학술논문

第九套广播体操案提出了体育动作是否构成作品的问题，该案的审理思路是从作品要件出发，从而否定了体育动作的作品性。然而，版权法传统理论对此的解释存在一定的片面性。“思想-表达二分法”应用于体育领域，面临界线模糊和标准不一等问题。独创性的要求在体育领域也有其特殊性。体育动作本身常不乏独创性，只是从竞技的目的出发，需要进行限制，但体育尤其是群众体育又有表演性的一面。从功利主义的产业政策出发，体育动作的保护成为产业发展的需要，著作权制度是一种可能的选择。由此，可区分体育的不同特点，制定不同的保护方式。
제구투엄파체조안제출료체육동작시부구성작품적문제，해안적심리사로시종작품요건출발，종이부정료체육동작적작품성。연이，판권법전통이론대차적해석존재일정적편면성。“사상-표체이분법”응용우체육영역，면림계선모호화표준불일등문제。독창성적요구재체육영역야유기특수성。체육동작본신상불핍독창성，지시종경기적목적출발，수요진행한제，단체육우기시군음체육우유표연성적일면。종공리주의적산업정책출발，체육동작적보호성위산업발전적수요，저작권제도시일충가능적선택。유차，가구분체육적불동특점，제정불동적보호방식。
The 9th Radio Gymnastic Exercises case has raised the issue of whether a sports movement constitutes a copyrightable work. The court concluded that sports movements are not copyrightable works. However traditional copyright law theory’s explanation of sports movements has a certain one-sidedness. If the“idea-expression dichotomy”is used in the ifeld of sports, then it will cause complications such as blurred boundaries and different standards. The requirement of originality also has unique implications concerning the ifeld of sports. Sports movements usually do not lack originality, and are only restricted in relation to athletics. However, some mass sports have a performance aspect. The copyright system is a possible choice for the furtherance of utilitarian industrial policies when the protection of sports movements becomes part of industrial development. Therefore, the different characteristics of types of sports movements lead to different forms of protection.