科技与法律
科技與法律
과기여법률
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND LAW
2014年
5期
754-777
,共24页
自由贸易试验区%知识产权%保护
自由貿易試驗區%知識產權%保護
자유무역시험구%지식산권%보호
Pilot Free Trade Zone%Intellectual Property%Protection
中国(上海)自由贸易试验区的建立对推进国内改革与世界市场开放具有里程碑式的意义。我国的自由贸易试验区属于自由贸易园区(FTZ),不同于自由贸易协定下的自由贸易区(FTA),也不同于传统保税区,具有“境内关外”和“一线放开、二线管住”的特征。自由贸易试验区的贸易便利化举措必然使其成为知识产权侵权避风港的可能性急剧上升。但由于相应制度的缺失和认识的偏差,自由贸易试验区可能成为知识产权海关执法的模糊区甚至空白区,同时我国目前的知识产权保护体系与自由贸易试验区寻求的便捷、高效的知识产权市场监管模式和纠纷解决机制相距甚远。从相关国际条约的立法和国内外自由贸易园区的实践来看,在自由贸易园区内实施更加严格的知识产权保护是现在和未来国际知识产权保护的必然趋势。因此,在自由贸易试验区内应加强知识产权海关保护、建立知识产权市场监管体系、完善知识产权纠纷解决机制。
中國(上海)自由貿易試驗區的建立對推進國內改革與世界市場開放具有裏程碑式的意義。我國的自由貿易試驗區屬于自由貿易園區(FTZ),不同于自由貿易協定下的自由貿易區(FTA),也不同于傳統保稅區,具有“境內關外”和“一線放開、二線管住”的特徵。自由貿易試驗區的貿易便利化舉措必然使其成為知識產權侵權避風港的可能性急劇上升。但由于相應製度的缺失和認識的偏差,自由貿易試驗區可能成為知識產權海關執法的模糊區甚至空白區,同時我國目前的知識產權保護體繫與自由貿易試驗區尋求的便捷、高效的知識產權市場鑑管模式和糾紛解決機製相距甚遠。從相關國際條約的立法和國內外自由貿易園區的實踐來看,在自由貿易園區內實施更加嚴格的知識產權保護是現在和未來國際知識產權保護的必然趨勢。因此,在自由貿易試驗區內應加彊知識產權海關保護、建立知識產權市場鑑管體繫、完善知識產權糾紛解決機製。
중국(상해)자유무역시험구적건립대추진국내개혁여세계시장개방구유리정비식적의의。아국적자유무역시험구속우자유무역완구(FTZ),불동우자유무역협정하적자유무역구(FTA),야불동우전통보세구,구유“경내관외”화“일선방개、이선관주”적특정。자유무역시험구적무역편리화거조필연사기성위지식산권침권피풍항적가능성급극상승。단유우상응제도적결실화인식적편차,자유무역시험구가능성위지식산권해관집법적모호구심지공백구,동시아국목전적지식산권보호체계여자유무역시험구심구적편첩、고효적지식산권시장감관모식화규분해결궤제상거심원。종상관국제조약적입법화국내외자유무역완구적실천래간,재자유무역완구내실시경가엄격적지식산권보호시현재화미래국제지식산권보호적필연추세。인차,재자유무역시험구내응가강지식산권해관보호、건립지식산권시장감관체계、완선지식산권규분해결궤제。
China(Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone marks a major milestone in the nation’s commitment to forge ahead with domestic reforms and wider opening to world markets. The Pilot Free Trade Zone of our country belongs to Free Trade Zone(FTZ), which is different from the Free Trade Area(FTA) stipulated in the Free Trade Agreement and is also different from the traditional bonded area. Features of the Pilot Free Trade Zone are“outside the Customs territory”and“ifrst-line completely liberalized, safely and efifciently manage to second-line”. Trade facilitation measures in Zone will inevitably lead to high possibility of infringement of Intellectual Property. However, the Pilot Free Trade Zone may be vague in, even totally beyond the Customs enforcement of Intellectual Property because of the lack of regulation and misunderstanding of the Zone. Meanwhile, the traditional Intellectual Property Protection System may be far from the convenient and efifcient market supervision and dispute resolution which the FTZ are seeking for. According to the legislation of relevant international treaties and the practice of the free trade zones at home and abroad, it is a trend of international protection of Intellectual Property to implement stricter protection of Intellectual Property in Free Trade Zones. Thus, it is recommended to strengthen the Customs protection, establish Market Regulatory System and improve the Dispute Resolution Mechanism of Intellectual Property in Pilot Free Trade Zone.