CAJ | 학술논문

目的：应用改良Jadad评分标准和CONSORT（2010）声明评价2000-2012年发表的我国牙种植领域的随机对照试验（RCT），了解我国牙种植临床试验报告质量的现状。方法计算机检索中国生物医学文献数据库（CBM）、维普中文科技期刊数据库（VIP）和中国期刊全文数据库（CNKI），外文数据库PubMed和EMBASE，同时配合手工检索2000-2012年我国19种口腔医学期刊，纳入牙种植领域的RCT。采用CONSORT（2010）和改良Jadad评分量表对纳入文献进行报告质量评价。结果共纳入28篇相关RCT，其报告质量普遍不高，改良Jadad平均评分仅为（1.29±0.71）分，CONSORT（2010）的平均得分仅为（9.75±3.60）分。结论目前我国牙种植领域的随机对照试验方法学质量普遍较低，报告质量也尚有一定差距。
목적：응용개량Jadad평분표준화CONSORT（2010）성명평개2000-2012년발표적아국아충식영역적수궤대조시험（RCT），료해아국아충식림상시험보고질량적현상。방법계산궤검색중국생물의학문헌수거고（CBM）、유보중문과기기간수거고（VIP）화중국기간전문수거고（CNKI），외문수거고PubMed화EMBASE，동시배합수공검색2000-2012년아국19충구강의학기간，납입아충식영역적RCT。채용CONSORT（2010）화개량Jadad평분량표대납입문헌진행보고질량평개。결과공납입28편상관RCT，기보고질량보편불고，개량Jadad평균평분부위（1.29±0.71）분，CONSORT（2010）적평균득분부위（9.75±3.60）분。결론목전아국아충식영역적수궤대조시험방법학질량보편교저，보고질량야상유일정차거。
Objective To assess the quality of reporting by randomized controlled trial (RCT) related to dental implants in China during 2000 to 2012 by using the revised Jadad scale and consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) (2010) statement. Methods The following electronic databases were searched: Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, PubMed, and EMBASE. A total of 19 journals of stomatology in China were also searched manually. The qualities of RCT with dental implant published between 2000 and 2012 were assessed using CONSORT (2010) statement and revised Jadad scale. Results Twenty-eight RCTs related to dental implants were identified. The quality of reporting in 28 articles was low. The mean revised Jadad score was 1.29±0.71 and the CONSORT (2010) score was 9.75±3.60. Conclusion The methodological qualities of the included studies on dental implants are generally low, and reporting quality remain unsatisfactory.