泰山医学院学报
泰山醫學院學報
태산의학원학보
JOURNAL OF TAISHAN MEDICAL COLLEGE
2014年
8期
763-765
,共3页
髋关节置换术%全麻%腰硬联合麻醉
髖關節置換術%全痳%腰硬聯閤痳醉
관관절치환술%전마%요경연합마취
hip replacement%general anesthesia%waist hard joint anesthesia
目的:探讨全麻和腰硬联合麻醉用于髋关节置换术(HR)的临床效果与安全性。方法将118例髋关节置换术患者随机分为两组,对照组59例采用气管插管全麻,观察组59例采用腰硬联合麻醉,比较两组的临床麻醉效果、血液动力学变化及安全性。结果观察组的总有效98.31%明显的高于对照组86.44%(χ2=8.573,P <0.05),观察组在麻醉诱导后、插管后即刻、术中(切皮时)、拔管时的 HR、SPB、DPB 均低于对照组(均 P <0.05),观察组的麻醉用药剂量、感觉阻滞起效、阻滞完全时间以及苏醒时间均低于对照组(均 P <0.05),观察组的术后并发症发生率明显低于对照组(均 P <0.05)。结论腰硬联合麻醉用于髋关节置换术效果较好,安全、可靠,患者清醒时间较短,血液动力学稳定,并发症少,不良反应少,值得临床大力推广。
目的:探討全痳和腰硬聯閤痳醉用于髖關節置換術(HR)的臨床效果與安全性。方法將118例髖關節置換術患者隨機分為兩組,對照組59例採用氣管插管全痳,觀察組59例採用腰硬聯閤痳醉,比較兩組的臨床痳醉效果、血液動力學變化及安全性。結果觀察組的總有效98.31%明顯的高于對照組86.44%(χ2=8.573,P <0.05),觀察組在痳醉誘導後、插管後即刻、術中(切皮時)、拔管時的 HR、SPB、DPB 均低于對照組(均 P <0.05),觀察組的痳醉用藥劑量、感覺阻滯起效、阻滯完全時間以及囌醒時間均低于對照組(均 P <0.05),觀察組的術後併髮癥髮生率明顯低于對照組(均 P <0.05)。結論腰硬聯閤痳醉用于髖關節置換術效果較好,安全、可靠,患者清醒時間較短,血液動力學穩定,併髮癥少,不良反應少,值得臨床大力推廣。
목적:탐토전마화요경연합마취용우관관절치환술(HR)적림상효과여안전성。방법장118례관관절치환술환자수궤분위량조,대조조59례채용기관삽관전마,관찰조59례채용요경연합마취,비교량조적림상마취효과、혈액동역학변화급안전성。결과관찰조적총유효98.31%명현적고우대조조86.44%(χ2=8.573,P <0.05),관찰조재마취유도후、삽관후즉각、술중(절피시)、발관시적 HR、SPB、DPB 균저우대조조(균 P <0.05),관찰조적마취용약제량、감각조체기효、조체완전시간이급소성시간균저우대조조(균 P <0.05),관찰조적술후병발증발생솔명현저우대조조(균 P <0.05)。결론요경연합마취용우관관절치환술효과교호,안전、가고,환자청성시간교단,혈액동역학은정,병발증소,불량반응소,치득림상대력추엄。
objective:to discuss the general and waist hard joint anesthesia used in the clinical effect and security of the hip joint replacement(HR). Methods:118 patients with hip replacement were randomly divided into two groups,the control group in 59 patients with tracheal intubation anesthesia,observation group of 59 patients with waist hard joint anes-thesia,comparing two groups of clinical anesthesia effect,hemodynamic changes and security. Results:the total effective 98. 31% of observation group was obviously higher than the control group 86. 44%(chi - square = 8. 573,P < 0. 05),the observation group after anesthesia induction,immediately after intubation,intraoperative(cut skin),HR,spb extubation, DPB were lower than the control group(all P < 0. 05),the observation group of dosage,sensory block anesthesia effect, block completely and awakening time were lower than control group(all P < 0. 05),the incidence of postoperative compli-cations of observation group was obviously lower than that of control group(all P < 0. 05). Conclusion the waist hard joint anesthesia for hip replacement effect is good,safe,reliable,relatively short waking hours,hemodynamic stability,fewer complications,less adverse reaction,is worth promoting in the clinical practice.