解放军医药杂志
解放軍醫藥雜誌
해방군의약잡지
MEDICAL&PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE PEOPLE'S LIBERATION ARMY
2014年
10期
74-77
,共4页
刘毅君%刘占国%吴峰%吴海桂%林惠青
劉毅君%劉佔國%吳峰%吳海桂%林惠青
류의군%류점국%오봉%오해계%림혜청
肺表面活性蛋白A%社区获得性肺炎%预后
肺錶麵活性蛋白A%社區穫得性肺炎%預後
폐표면활성단백A%사구획득성폐염%예후
Pulmonary surfactant protein A%Community acquired pneumonia%Prognosis
目的:探讨肺表面活性蛋白A( SP-A)和社区获得性肺炎( CAP)预后的相关性。方法随机选取南方医科大学珠江医院2011年9月-2013年10月100例CAP患者,按病情CURB-65评估标准将患者分为轻度组、中度组和重度组;依照CAP危重评级的标准[7],将患者分为低危组、中危组、高危组、极高危组,组间比较临床预后指标(住院时间、机械通气和氧合指数)的差异。结果中度组与重度组患者的SP-A含量、氧合指数均显著低于轻度组( P<0.05),住院时间、机械通气时间均显著高于轻度组(P<0.05);中危组、高危组、极高危组患者的SP-A含量、氧合指数均显著低于低危组(P<0.05),住院时间、机械通气时间均显著高于低危组(P<0.05)。结论 SP-A是一种敏感、准确的生物特异性指标,在CAP病情程度和预后中具有重要的评估价值。
目的:探討肺錶麵活性蛋白A( SP-A)和社區穫得性肺炎( CAP)預後的相關性。方法隨機選取南方醫科大學珠江醫院2011年9月-2013年10月100例CAP患者,按病情CURB-65評估標準將患者分為輕度組、中度組和重度組;依照CAP危重評級的標準[7],將患者分為低危組、中危組、高危組、極高危組,組間比較臨床預後指標(住院時間、機械通氣和氧閤指數)的差異。結果中度組與重度組患者的SP-A含量、氧閤指數均顯著低于輕度組( P<0.05),住院時間、機械通氣時間均顯著高于輕度組(P<0.05);中危組、高危組、極高危組患者的SP-A含量、氧閤指數均顯著低于低危組(P<0.05),住院時間、機械通氣時間均顯著高于低危組(P<0.05)。結論 SP-A是一種敏感、準確的生物特異性指標,在CAP病情程度和預後中具有重要的評估價值。
목적:탐토폐표면활성단백A( SP-A)화사구획득성폐염( CAP)예후적상관성。방법수궤선취남방의과대학주강의원2011년9월-2013년10월100례CAP환자,안병정CURB-65평고표준장환자분위경도조、중도조화중도조;의조CAP위중평급적표준[7],장환자분위저위조、중위조、고위조、겁고위조,조간비교림상예후지표(주원시간、궤계통기화양합지수)적차이。결과중도조여중도조환자적SP-A함량、양합지수균현저저우경도조( P<0.05),주원시간、궤계통기시간균현저고우경도조(P<0.05);중위조、고위조、겁고위조환자적SP-A함량、양합지수균현저저우저위조(P<0.05),주원시간、궤계통기시간균현저고우저위조(P<0.05)。결론 SP-A시일충민감、준학적생물특이성지표,재CAP병정정도화예후중구유중요적평고개치。
Objective To study the correlation between prognosis of community acquired pneumonia ( CAP) and pulmonary surfactant protein A (SP-A) . Methods A total of 100 CAP patients were randomly selected from Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University during September 2011 and October 2013. The patients were divided into mild group, moderate group and severe group according to the CURB-65 evaluation criteria, and were divided into mild risk group, moderate risk group, high risk group and very high risk group according to critical rating standard. The differences of clinical prognostic indexes ( hospitalization time, mechanical ventilation and oxygenation index) were compared among the groups according to the same standard. Results The levels of SP-A content and oxygenation index in moderate and severe groups were significantly lower than that in mild group (P<0. 05), and hospitalization and mechanical ventilation times were significantly longer than that in mild group (P<0. 05);the levels of SP-A content and oxygenation index in medium risk, high risk and very high risk groups were significantly lower than that in low risk group (P<0. 05), while the hospitalization and mechanical ventilation times were significantly longer than that in low risk group ( P <0. 05 ) . Conclusion SP-A is a sensitive and accurate biological specificity index, and it has important assessment value in dis-ease severity degree and prognosis of community acquired pneumonia.