国际护理学杂志
國際護理學雜誌
국제호이학잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING
2014年
10期
2880-2881
,共2页
神经内科重症感染%临床特点%护理%护理策略
神經內科重癥感染%臨床特點%護理%護理策略
신경내과중증감염%림상특점%호리%호리책략
Severe neurological infection%Clinical character%Nursing%Nursing measure
目的：探讨研究神经内科重症感染患者的感染原因、临床特点及其护理对策。方法随机选取2009年12月至2011年12月间我院收治的神经内科重症感染患者120例，作为研究对象。将120例患者随机分为治疗组和对照组。对照组的患者在常规治疗基础上予以头孢氨苄口服治疗，治疗组的患者在对照组的基础上予以甲硝唑口服治疗。比较两组患者在治疗前及治疗1d、3d、5d后的血生化指标情况，并且比较两组患者在治疗5d后的总疗效，综合以上检测指标对比分析神经内科重症感染患者感染的原因及治疗后的疗效。结果患者在接受治疗1d、3d、5d后，治疗组患者的血生化指标比对照组有明显改善，而且治疗5 d后的总有效情况明显好于对照组，经统计学软件SPSS 16．0分析处理后得出χ2＝36．94，P＜0．05，说明二者间的差异有统计学意义。结论在所有神经内科重症感染患者中，呼吸道的感染所致疾病占绝大多数，并且对神经内科重症感染患者采取联合用药的效果明显优于单一药物的应用。
目的：探討研究神經內科重癥感染患者的感染原因、臨床特點及其護理對策。方法隨機選取2009年12月至2011年12月間我院收治的神經內科重癥感染患者120例，作為研究對象。將120例患者隨機分為治療組和對照組。對照組的患者在常規治療基礎上予以頭孢氨芐口服治療，治療組的患者在對照組的基礎上予以甲硝唑口服治療。比較兩組患者在治療前及治療1d、3d、5d後的血生化指標情況，併且比較兩組患者在治療5d後的總療效，綜閤以上檢測指標對比分析神經內科重癥感染患者感染的原因及治療後的療效。結果患者在接受治療1d、3d、5d後，治療組患者的血生化指標比對照組有明顯改善，而且治療5 d後的總有效情況明顯好于對照組，經統計學軟件SPSS 16．0分析處理後得齣χ2＝36．94，P＜0．05，說明二者間的差異有統計學意義。結論在所有神經內科重癥感染患者中，呼吸道的感染所緻疾病佔絕大多數，併且對神經內科重癥感染患者採取聯閤用藥的效果明顯優于單一藥物的應用。
목적：탐토연구신경내과중증감염환자적감염원인、림상특점급기호리대책。방법수궤선취2009년12월지2011년12월간아원수치적신경내과중증감염환자120례，작위연구대상。장120례환자수궤분위치료조화대조조。대조조적환자재상규치료기출상여이두포안변구복치료，치료조적환자재대조조적기출상여이갑초서구복치료。비교량조환자재치료전급치료1d、3d、5d후적혈생화지표정황，병차비교량조환자재치료5d후적총료효，종합이상검측지표대비분석신경내과중증감염환자감염적원인급치료후적료효。결과환자재접수치료1d、3d、5d후，치료조환자적혈생화지표비대조조유명현개선，이차치료5 d후적총유효정황명현호우대조조，경통계학연건SPSS 16．0분석처리후득출χ2＝36．94，P＜0．05，설명이자간적차이유통계학의의。결론재소유신경내과중증감염환자중，호흡도적감염소치질병점절대다수，병차대신경내과중증감염환자채취연합용약적효과명현우우단일약물적응용。
Objective To explore severe neurological infection patients'infection causes, clinical characters and nursing measures. Methods In our hospital from December 2009 to December 2011 120 neurological infection patients were selected and divided into treat-ment group and control group.The patients in the control group were treated with cefalexin based on the routine treatment, the patents in the treatment group were treated with metronidazole.Blood biochemical indexes of two groups were compared before treatment and 1day, 3 days and 5 days after treatment, 5 days after treatment overall curative effects were compared.Results After received the treatment of 1 day, 3 days and 5days, the patients'blood biochemical indexes in treatment group was improved a lot compared with those patients'index in control group, and the overall efficacy 5 days after treatment was obviously better than that of the control group, with significant differences ( P<0.05) .Conclusions Among all of the severe neurological infection patients, the disease caused by pneogaster infection take the majority portion, and using combination drug therapy to treat those severe neurological infection patients can have an obviously better effects than the application of single medicine.
