CAJ | 학술논문

从叙事理论的角度对费孝通先生的传统民族志经典《江村经济》和林耀华先生的实验民族志经典《金翼》进行比较分析，可以看出传统民族志创作的学术严谨性，同时叙事模式也略显古板；而实验民族志却可以通过体例的创新---小说，使民族志的创作更加灵活，人物的刻画更加生动，所阐释的文化呈现出开放性和动态性特点。笔者试图找出两部民族志呈现出的不同特色，以及两部存在巨大差异的作品依然能够成为民族志代表作的原因。
종서사이론적각도대비효통선생적전통민족지경전《강촌경제》화림요화선생적실험민족지경전《금익》진행비교분석，가이간출전통민족지창작적학술엄근성，동시서사모식야략현고판；이실험민족지각가이통과체례적창신---소설，사민족지적창작경가령활，인물적각화경가생동，소천석적문화정현출개방성화동태성특점。필자시도조출량부민족지정현출적불동특색，이급량부존재거대차이적작품의연능구성위민족지대표작적원인。
In this article,we have a Comparative analysis between the classic of traditional ethnogra-phic Economy of Jiang Village by Feixiaotong and the classic of experimental ethnography Gold Wing by Linyaohua from the perspective of narratology. The academic rigour on the creation of traditional ethnogra-phy can be seen clearly,while its slighly stuffy narrative mode is fully exposed as well. On the contrary, the experimental ethnography can make the creation of ethnography more vivid with an Innovative style, namely,the novel. And the characteristics of openness and dynamic also appear naturely in the culture in-terpreted. I write this paper trying to figure out the different characteristics presented by this two ethnogra-phy,and eliminate the doubt why the two classics differ so sharply ,but both of them are still able to be the representatives of ethnography.