地震工程学报
地震工程學報
지진공정학보
China Earthquake Engineering Journal
2014年
3期
663-673
,共11页
谢虹%雷中生%袁道阳%苏琦
謝虹%雷中生%袁道暘%囌琦
사홍%뢰중생%원도양%소기
滇西南%历史地震考证%1884 年宁洱地震%发震构造
滇西南%歷史地震攷證%1884 年寧洱地震%髮震構造
전서남%역사지진고증%1884 년저이지진%발진구조
southwest Yunnan%research on historical earthquake%the 1884 Ninger earthquake%seismogenic structure
对1884年11月14日云南宁洱地震参数进行了重新核定。这次地震的震中位置位于普洱府(今宁洱)周围,即23.1°N、101.0°E,精度为1类,误差≤10 km,震级6????级,震中烈度Ⅷ度。等震线破坏区呈 NE 走向,而有感区长轴呈 NE 向,二者之间有一定差异。1884年宁洱地震区位于滇西南地区的龙陵-澜沧江断裂与红河断裂之间思茅次级地块内的普洱断裂带附近,其极震区长轴方向与断裂走向一致,应为本次地震的发震构造。
對1884年11月14日雲南寧洱地震參數進行瞭重新覈定。這次地震的震中位置位于普洱府(今寧洱)週圍,即23.1°N、101.0°E,精度為1類,誤差≤10 km,震級6????級,震中烈度Ⅷ度。等震線破壞區呈 NE 走嚮,而有感區長軸呈 NE 嚮,二者之間有一定差異。1884年寧洱地震區位于滇西南地區的龍陵-瀾滄江斷裂與紅河斷裂之間思茅次級地塊內的普洱斷裂帶附近,其極震區長軸方嚮與斷裂走嚮一緻,應為本次地震的髮震構造。
대1884년11월14일운남저이지진삼수진행료중신핵정。저차지진적진중위치위우보이부(금저이)주위,즉23.1°N、101.0°E,정도위1류,오차≤10 km,진급6????급,진중열도Ⅷ도。등진선파배구정 NE 주향,이유감구장축정 NE 향,이자지간유일정차이。1884년저이지진구위우전서남지구적룡릉-란창강단렬여홍하단렬지간사모차급지괴내적보이단렬대부근,기겁진구장축방향여단렬주향일치,응위본차지진적발진구조。
Based on the historical earthquake reports of the Ninger earthquake in the Yunnan province on November 14, 1884, and a site inspection, new information has been obtained about this historical earthquake, providing credible evidence for the improvement of the isoseismal line. This paper thus reevaluates the Ninger earthquake parameters. The historical earthquake material is primarily from Guangxu Memoir and the memorial to the throne of the Palace, as well as the historical material of local chronicles. The results show that the epicenter was located near Puer mansion (presently Ninger), which is 23. 1°N, 101. 0°E. The accuracy is class 1, with an average er-ror less than or equal to 10 km;the earthquake magnitude was 6. 75;the epicentral intensity wasⅧ. The most damaged area in this earthquake was Puer mansion. The damage scope was limited, and the epicenter zone can be delineated within 30 km from Puer mansion. The aftershocks were frequent and lasted for almost one month. It was a typical mainshock-aftershock earthquake. The early frequent seismic activity and continued aftershocks, as well as the relief activity of the local government and the Qing court, reveal that the magnitude of this earthquake was high and the damage was severe. The isoseismal line damage area of this earthquake pointed northwest, and the long axis of the earthquake-sensitive area pointed northeast. There is a marked difference between those two areas. Yunnan is located on the east edge of the continental border of the Indian and Eurasian plates. There are two force components acting on the Yunnan region. One is the strong lateral pressing of the Indian plate, and the other is the SSE squeezing force related to the plate activity. The east fault activity of the Yunnan region is closely related to the squeezing force. Anal-ysis of seismogenic structures shows that the Puer fault is a seismogenic structure of this Ninger earthquake. The geometric position of the Ninger earthquake in year 1884 overlaps with the posi-tion of the Puer fault, and it is located among the checkerboard made of the NNW-trending Puer fault and a series of NEE-trending faults. Because the lateral offset of the Puer fault and the left offset of the NEE-trending faults, the earthquake of MS6. 75 happened in 1884 in Ninger. The Puer fault belongs to the Simao secondary block, which is located between the Longling-Lancang Riv-er fault and the Red River fault. The trend of the long axis of the meizoseismal damage area runs parallel to that of the causative fault. Between the NNW-trending Puer fault and the Mohei fault, there exist multiple NEE-trending parallel fracture belts, which are small-scale, have poor conti-nuity, and form in groups with a left-lateral dislocation. These grouped parallel faults formed a checkerboard fault block. An MS6.4 earthquake occurred approximately 3 km south of Ninger on June 3, 2007. Studies of this earthquake showed that main characteristics of the northwest nodal plane were a right-lateral thrusting slide and those of the northeast nodal plane were left slip. Thus, the right-lateral slide of the NNW-trending Puer fault and the left-lateral dislocation led to this earthquake. Because of the fragmentized crustal structure, the region is MS6. 2 ~ 6. 8 earth-quake-prone, and this is why there are no bigger earthquakes in this region. Due to the complicated fault structure and fragmentation, as well as the landscape and geomorphic influences, there are still uncertainties. A further detail study of the Puer fault and seismogenic structures should be carried out so as to obtain more reliable results.