会计与经济研究
會計與經濟研究
회계여경제연구
Journal of Shanghai LiXin University of Commerce
2014年
5期
26-40
,共15页
产品市场竞争%公司违规%处罚%商业信用
產品市場競爭%公司違規%處罰%商業信用
산품시장경쟁%공사위규%처벌%상업신용
product market competition%corporate fraud%punishment%trade credit
通过研究公司违规被监管机构处罚这一事件对商业信用获取及其使用成本的影响,考察了企业在资本市场的声誉受损是否会传染并影响到“供应商-客户”关系。实证结果发现,公司在发生违法违规行为被监管机构处罚后,获得的商业信用额度变少,“商业信用-现金持有”敏感性提高,也即商业信用的使用成本上升。进一步地,违规被罚事件在竞争激烈的行业中对“供应商-客户”关系破坏更严重,即在产品市场竞争更加激烈的行业,公司违规被罚后商业信用减少与使用成本的提高更显著。结论表明,除了股东和债权人,供应商也会看重公司的违法违规事件,监管机构对公司违规行为的处罚并非“纸老虎”,处罚的传染效应使得企业会承担因与其他合约方关系的破坏而造成的间接成本。
通過研究公司違規被鑑管機構處罰這一事件對商業信用穫取及其使用成本的影響,攷察瞭企業在資本市場的聲譽受損是否會傳染併影響到“供應商-客戶”關繫。實證結果髮現,公司在髮生違法違規行為被鑑管機構處罰後,穫得的商業信用額度變少,“商業信用-現金持有”敏感性提高,也即商業信用的使用成本上升。進一步地,違規被罰事件在競爭激烈的行業中對“供應商-客戶”關繫破壞更嚴重,即在產品市場競爭更加激烈的行業,公司違規被罰後商業信用減少與使用成本的提高更顯著。結論錶明,除瞭股東和債權人,供應商也會看重公司的違法違規事件,鑑管機構對公司違規行為的處罰併非“紙老虎”,處罰的傳染效應使得企業會承擔因與其他閤約方關繫的破壞而造成的間接成本。
통과연구공사위규피감관궤구처벌저일사건대상업신용획취급기사용성본적영향,고찰료기업재자본시장적성예수손시부회전염병영향도“공응상-객호”관계。실증결과발현,공사재발생위법위규행위피감관궤구처벌후,획득적상업신용액도변소,“상업신용-현금지유”민감성제고,야즉상업신용적사용성본상승。진일보지,위규피벌사건재경쟁격렬적행업중대“공응상-객호”관계파배경엄중,즉재산품시장경쟁경가격렬적행업,공사위규피벌후상업신용감소여사용성본적제고경현저。결론표명,제료고동화채권인,공응상야회간중공사적위법위규사건,감관궤구대공사위규행위적처벌병비“지로호”,처벌적전염효응사득기업회승담인여기타합약방관계적파배이조성적간접성본。
Punishments for corporate frauds by regulators destroy the reputation of the companies.We examine whether the punishments impair the relationship between supplier and customer by testing the effects of the punishments on the amount of trade credit and the costs of using it.We find that fraudulent listed companies tend to be associated with less trade credit and higher sensitivity of trade credit to cash, namely higher costs of using trade credit.Moreover, the negative effect of corporate frauds on the relationship between suppli-er and customer is more pronounced in competitive industries, leading to significantly grea-ter reduction in trade credit and greater increase in the costs of using trade credit.Our re-sults reveal that besides the shareholders and debt-holders, suppliers also pay attention to the punishments for company frauds, and argue that the regulators are not toothless tigers, and the punishments cause the fraudulent companies to bear the costs related to the impair-ment of their relationship with other stakeholders.