空气动力学学报
空氣動力學學報
공기동역학학보
ACTA AERODYNAMICA SINICA
2014年
5期
654-659,667
,共7页
蔡晓伟%谭俊杰%王园丁%任登凤%WANG Huasheng%石清
蔡曉偉%譚俊傑%王園丁%任登鳳%WANG Huasheng%石清
채효위%담준걸%왕완정%임등봉%WANG Huasheng%석청
各向异性点云%点云重构%移动最小二乘%无网格法%湍流模型
各嚮異性點雲%點雲重構%移動最小二乘%無網格法%湍流模型
각향이성점운%점운중구%이동최소이승%무망격법%단류모형
anisotropic cloud of points%cloud of points reconstruction%moving least squares method%meshless method%turbulence model
基于在高度各向异性点云结构中取得良好结果的点云重构技术,采用移动最小二乘无网格法解耦计算了k-ω型湍流模型方程和雷诺平均 N-S 方程(RANS),实现了对湍流流动的数值模拟。通过对 NACA0012翼型、RAE2822翼型的绕流以及后向台阶大分离流动的数值模拟,比较分析了 k-ω SST(Shear Stress Transport)和 k-ωTNT(Turbulent/Non-Turbulent)两种模型的湍流预测能力。结果表明:对弱逆压梯度情况下的湍流,两者具有相当的预测能力;而 k-ω SST 较 k-ω TNT 具有更好的激波捕捉能力。对于大分离流动,两种模型较实验数据均存在一定差异,但总体趋势吻合良好。
基于在高度各嚮異性點雲結構中取得良好結果的點雲重構技術,採用移動最小二乘無網格法解耦計算瞭k-ω型湍流模型方程和雷諾平均 N-S 方程(RANS),實現瞭對湍流流動的數值模擬。通過對 NACA0012翼型、RAE2822翼型的繞流以及後嚮檯階大分離流動的數值模擬,比較分析瞭 k-ω SST(Shear Stress Transport)和 k-ωTNT(Turbulent/Non-Turbulent)兩種模型的湍流預測能力。結果錶明:對弱逆壓梯度情況下的湍流,兩者具有相噹的預測能力;而 k-ω SST 較 k-ω TNT 具有更好的激波捕捉能力。對于大分離流動,兩種模型較實驗數據均存在一定差異,但總體趨勢吻閤良好。
기우재고도각향이성점운결구중취득량호결과적점운중구기술,채용이동최소이승무망격법해우계산료k-ω형단류모형방정화뢰낙평균 N-S 방정(RANS),실현료대단류류동적수치모의。통과대 NACA0012익형、RAE2822익형적요류이급후향태계대분리류동적수치모의,비교분석료 k-ω SST(Shear Stress Transport)화 k-ωTNT(Turbulent/Non-Turbulent)량충모형적단류예측능력。결과표명:대약역압제도정황하적단류,량자구유상당적예측능력;이 k-ω SST 교 k-ω TNT 구유경호적격파포착능력。대우대분리류동,량충모형교실험수거균존재일정차이,단총체추세문합량호。
In order to solve k-ω type turbulence model equations and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes e-quations (RANS),cloud reconstruction technology,which can obtain well results from high aspect radio ani-sotropic cloud of points,is adopted in moving least squares meshless method.With the cloud reconstruction technique and the meshless method,it is realistic to simulate turbulence flows.The turbulence prediction a-bilities of the k-ω SST (Shear Stress Transport)and the k-ω TNT (Turbulent Non Turbulent)modes are demonstrated on a number of cases including NACA0012 airfoil,RAE2822 airfoil and backward-facing step. It can be found that:for weak advanced pressure gradient flows,the two models have the same ability for prediction;while in shock introduced separation turbulence flows,the SST model show better predicted abil-ity of shock capture than TNT model;for large scale separation flows,there are some differences between the results of the two models and the experimental data,while the overall trends are in good agreement with the experimental data.