CAJ | 학술논문

目的：观察阿奇霉素联合痰热清注射液治疗小儿肺炎支原体肺炎（ MPP ）的效果。方法将MPP患儿100例随机分为观察组和对照组各50例，观察组采用阿奇霉素联合痰热清注射液治疗，对照组单用阿奇霉素治疗。比较两组的疗效。结果观察组治疗后体温恢复正常时间、咳嗽症状消失时间、肺部体征消失时间、X线胸片吸收好转时间、总病程等方面较对照组明显缩短，差异有统计学意义（ P＜0.01）；观察组疗效优于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）；观察组无复发，对照组复发4例（8.0％）。结论阿奇霉素联合痰热清注射液治疗小儿MPP疗程短、治愈率高、复发率低，值得临床上推广应用。
목적：관찰아기매소연합담열청주사액치료소인폐염지원체폐염（ MPP ）적효과。방법장MPP환인100례수궤분위관찰조화대조조각50례，관찰조채용아기매소연합담열청주사액치료，대조조단용아기매소치료。비교량조적료효。결과관찰조치료후체온회복정상시간、해수증상소실시간、폐부체정소실시간、X선흉편흡수호전시간、총병정등방면교대조조명현축단，차이유통계학의의（ P＜0.01）；관찰조료효우우대조조，차이유통계학의의（P＜0.01）；관찰조무복발，대조조복발4례（8.0％）。결론아기매소연합담열청주사액치료소인MPP료정단、치유솔고、복발솔저，치득림상상추엄응용。
Objective To investigate the therapeutic efficacy of azithromycin combined with Tanreqing injec-tion in treatment of children with mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia( MPP) .Methods One hundred children with MPP were randomly divided into two groups with 50 cases in each group, the observation group received the therapy of azithromycin combined with Tanreqing injection, while the control group received the therapy of azithromycin only, and then comparison was made between the two groups in clinical effects.Results There was a significant difference between the two groups in the time of the disappearance of fever,cough and pulmonary signs and X-ray recovery( P<0.01), and there was also a statistic difference in curative rate(P<0.01).No case relapsed in the observation group while 4 cases(8.0%) in the control group.Conclusion The therapy of azithromycin combined with Tanreqing injec-tion has obvious superiority with shorter courses, higher curative rate and lower relapse rate than single azithromycin in treatment of children with MPP, worthy of clinical popularization and application.