中华危重病急救医学
中華危重病急救醫學
중화위중병급구의학
Chinese Critical Care Medicine
2014年
10期
718-721
,共4页
窦微微%王立祥%刘惠亮%张蓬川%郭成成%刘亚华%马立芝%孙鲲%马文君%汪茜%郭晓东
竇微微%王立祥%劉惠亮%張蓬川%郭成成%劉亞華%馬立芝%孫鯤%馬文君%汪茜%郭曉東
두미미%왕립상%류혜량%장봉천%곽성성%류아화%마립지%손곤%마문군%왕천%곽효동
插入式腹主动脉按压%心肺复苏%心搏骤停%心肺脑复苏%平均动脉压%脑血流
插入式腹主動脈按壓%心肺複囌%心搏驟停%心肺腦複囌%平均動脈壓%腦血流
삽입식복주동맥안압%심폐복소%심박취정%심폐뇌복소%평균동맥압%뇌혈류
Interrupted abdominal aorta compression-cardiopulmonary resuscitation%Cardiopulmonary resuscitation%Cardiac arrest%Cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitation%Mean arterial pressure%Cerebral blood flow
目的:探讨插入式腹主动脉按压心肺复苏(IAAC-CPR)对心搏骤停兔心肺脑复苏的效果。方法健康新西兰大白兔10只,雌雄不拘,按随机数字表法分为传统胸外按压心肺复苏(CC-CPR)组和IAAC-CPR组,每组5只。经颈静脉快速推注冰氯化钾并夹闭气管导管制备心搏骤停模型;心搏骤停3 min后开始实施心肺复苏(CPR),CC-CPR组为呼吸机辅助通气+胸外按压;IAAC-CPR组为呼吸机辅助通气+胸外按压+腹主动脉按压。观察CPR过程中血流动力学和脑皮质血流的变化;记录自主循环恢复(ROSC)时间,观察动物24 h生存情况、24 h神经功能评分及腹部器官情况等。结果 IAAC-CPR组复苏后30、60、90、120 s时脑血流量(CBF,PU值)及平均动脉压(MAP,mmHg,1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)均明显高于CC-CPR组(CBF 30 s:16.1±6.0比7.8±2.2,60 s:91.6±11.8比57.3±23.2,90 s:259.9±74.9比163.6±50.3,120 s:301.5±60.5比208.4±23.8;MAP 30 s:46.4±9.4比31.4±8.7,60 s:55.8±13.8比34.0±11.5,90 s:61.2±11.5比38.2±10.1,120 s:63.6±11.8比40.2±10.2;均P<0.05)。与CC-CPR组比较,IAAC-CPR组ROSC所需时间明显缩短(s:182.0±59.0比312.6±86.6,t=2.787,P=0.024),24 h神经功能评分明显下降(分:2.4±1.7比4.6±0.6,t=2.974,P=0.023);而复苏成功率(80.0%比60.0%,χ2=0.000,P=1.000)、24 h存活率升高(80.0%比40.0%,χ2=0.417,P=0.519),但差异无统计学意义。ROSC后24 h尸解动物均未发现肝脏损伤。结论在心搏骤停兔复苏早期,IAAC-CPR较CC-CPR取得了更好的脑血流灌注,明显减轻了心搏骤停兔的神经系统功能损伤,且无腹部器官损伤。
目的:探討插入式腹主動脈按壓心肺複囌(IAAC-CPR)對心搏驟停兔心肺腦複囌的效果。方法健康新西蘭大白兔10隻,雌雄不拘,按隨機數字錶法分為傳統胸外按壓心肺複囌(CC-CPR)組和IAAC-CPR組,每組5隻。經頸靜脈快速推註冰氯化鉀併夾閉氣管導管製備心搏驟停模型;心搏驟停3 min後開始實施心肺複囌(CPR),CC-CPR組為呼吸機輔助通氣+胸外按壓;IAAC-CPR組為呼吸機輔助通氣+胸外按壓+腹主動脈按壓。觀察CPR過程中血流動力學和腦皮質血流的變化;記錄自主循環恢複(ROSC)時間,觀察動物24 h生存情況、24 h神經功能評分及腹部器官情況等。結果 IAAC-CPR組複囌後30、60、90、120 s時腦血流量(CBF,PU值)及平均動脈壓(MAP,mmHg,1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)均明顯高于CC-CPR組(CBF 30 s:16.1±6.0比7.8±2.2,60 s:91.6±11.8比57.3±23.2,90 s:259.9±74.9比163.6±50.3,120 s:301.5±60.5比208.4±23.8;MAP 30 s:46.4±9.4比31.4±8.7,60 s:55.8±13.8比34.0±11.5,90 s:61.2±11.5比38.2±10.1,120 s:63.6±11.8比40.2±10.2;均P<0.05)。與CC-CPR組比較,IAAC-CPR組ROSC所需時間明顯縮短(s:182.0±59.0比312.6±86.6,t=2.787,P=0.024),24 h神經功能評分明顯下降(分:2.4±1.7比4.6±0.6,t=2.974,P=0.023);而複囌成功率(80.0%比60.0%,χ2=0.000,P=1.000)、24 h存活率升高(80.0%比40.0%,χ2=0.417,P=0.519),但差異無統計學意義。ROSC後24 h尸解動物均未髮現肝髒損傷。結論在心搏驟停兔複囌早期,IAAC-CPR較CC-CPR取得瞭更好的腦血流灌註,明顯減輕瞭心搏驟停兔的神經繫統功能損傷,且無腹部器官損傷。
목적:탐토삽입식복주동맥안압심폐복소(IAAC-CPR)대심박취정토심폐뇌복소적효과。방법건강신서란대백토10지,자웅불구,안수궤수자표법분위전통흉외안압심폐복소(CC-CPR)조화IAAC-CPR조,매조5지。경경정맥쾌속추주빙록화갑병협폐기관도관제비심박취정모형;심박취정3 min후개시실시심폐복소(CPR),CC-CPR조위호흡궤보조통기+흉외안압;IAAC-CPR조위호흡궤보조통기+흉외안압+복주동맥안압。관찰CPR과정중혈류동역학화뇌피질혈류적변화;기록자주순배회복(ROSC)시간,관찰동물24 h생존정황、24 h신경공능평분급복부기관정황등。결과 IAAC-CPR조복소후30、60、90、120 s시뇌혈류량(CBF,PU치)급평균동맥압(MAP,mmHg,1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)균명현고우CC-CPR조(CBF 30 s:16.1±6.0비7.8±2.2,60 s:91.6±11.8비57.3±23.2,90 s:259.9±74.9비163.6±50.3,120 s:301.5±60.5비208.4±23.8;MAP 30 s:46.4±9.4비31.4±8.7,60 s:55.8±13.8비34.0±11.5,90 s:61.2±11.5비38.2±10.1,120 s:63.6±11.8비40.2±10.2;균P<0.05)。여CC-CPR조비교,IAAC-CPR조ROSC소수시간명현축단(s:182.0±59.0비312.6±86.6,t=2.787,P=0.024),24 h신경공능평분명현하강(분:2.4±1.7비4.6±0.6,t=2.974,P=0.023);이복소성공솔(80.0%비60.0%,χ2=0.000,P=1.000)、24 h존활솔승고(80.0%비40.0%,χ2=0.417,P=0.519),단차이무통계학의의。ROSC후24 h시해동물균미발현간장손상。결론재심박취정토복소조기,IAAC-CPR교CC-CPR취득료경호적뇌혈류관주,명현감경료심박취정토적신경계통공능손상,차무복부기관손상。
Objective To explore the effect of the interrupted abdominal aorta compression after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (IAAC-CPR)on cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitation in a rabbit model of cardiac arrest (CA). Methods According to the random number table,10 New Zealand rabbits of both genders were equally divided into the chest compression-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CC-CPR) group or IAAC-CPR group ,with 5 rabbits in each group. CA model was reproduced by injection of iced-potassium chloride into the jugular vein and obstruction of trachea to produce asphyxia. CA was maintained for 3 minutes before cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). CC-CPR was performed with assisted ventilation+chest compression,while IAAC-CPR was performed by the way of assisted ventilation + chest compressions + compressions on abdominal aorta. The hemodynamics and cerebral cortex blood flow were observed during resuscitation. Time of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC),24-hour survival rates,and scores of neurological function,and situation of abdominal organs were recorded. Results At 30, 60,90 and 120 seconds after CPR,the cerebral blood flow (CBF,PU value)and mean arterial pressure(MAP, mmHg,1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)of IAAC-CPR group were significantly higher than those of CC-CPR group(CBF 30 seconds:16.1±6.0 vs. 7.8±2.2,60 seconds:91.6±11.8 vs. 57.3±23.2,90 seconds:259.9±74.9 vs. 163.6± 50.3,120 seconds:301.5 ±60.5 vs. 208.4 ±23.8;MAP 30 seconds:46.4 ±9.4 vs. 31.4 ±8.7,60 seconds:55.8 ± 13.8 vs. 34.0±11.5,90 seconds:61.2±11.5 vs. 38.2±10.1,120 seconds:63.6±11.8 vs. 40.2±10.2,all P<0.05). Compared with CC-CPR group,in IAAC - CPR group,the time necessary for ROSC was obviously shortened (seconds:182.0 ±59.0 vs. 312.6 ±86.6,t=2.787,P=0.024),24-hour nerve function score was significantly lowered(2.4±1.7 vs. 4.6±0.6,t=2.974,P=0.023). The successful recovery rate(80.0%vs. 60.0%,χ2=0.000, P =1.000)and 24-hour survival rate (80.0% vs. 40.0%,χ2=0.417,P =0.519)were significantly increased,but without statistical significance. No liver damage was found at 24 hours after ROSC. Conclusion In the early recovery of CA in rabbit,IAAC-CPR can result in better cerebral blood flow perfusion as compared with CC-CPR,and it significantly reduced damage to the nervous system function without producing abdominal organ damage.