实用医学杂志
實用醫學雜誌
실용의학잡지
THE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL MEDICINE
2014年
17期
2759-2761
,共3页
梁少兰%杜作义%李自成%靳文
樑少蘭%杜作義%李自成%靳文
량소란%두작의%리자성%근문
心肌梗死%粒细胞集落刺激因子%内皮祖细胞
心肌梗死%粒細胞集落刺激因子%內皮祖細胞
심기경사%립세포집락자격인자%내피조세포
Myocardial infarction%Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor%Endothelial progenitor cells
目的:观察粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员内皮祖细胞(EPCs)对心肌梗死患者心功能的影响。方法:收集心肌梗死后心衰患者80例,随机分为常规治疗对照组和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员治疗观察组,每组40例。 EPCs 使用流式细胞仪检测。结果:观察组治疗前患者 EPCs 比例为(0.11±0.04)%,治疗后 EPCs 比例升高为(5.32±1.06)%(P <0.01)。治疗前2组 LVEF、LVEDD 和6MWT 比较差异无显著性(P >0.05),治疗后2组上述指标均显著性升高(P <0.05和 P <0.01),但治疗后上述指标在观察组显著高于对照组(P <0.05)。观察组临床治疗有效率为90.0%显著优于对照组的75.0%(P <0.05)。对照组和观察组不良反应发生率分别为7.5%和10.0%,两组之间比较差异无显著性(P >0.05)。结论:G-CSF 可以高效动员 EPCs,有利于心梗患者心功能的恢复。
目的:觀察粒細胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)動員內皮祖細胞(EPCs)對心肌梗死患者心功能的影響。方法:收集心肌梗死後心衰患者80例,隨機分為常規治療對照組和粒細胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)動員治療觀察組,每組40例。 EPCs 使用流式細胞儀檢測。結果:觀察組治療前患者 EPCs 比例為(0.11±0.04)%,治療後 EPCs 比例升高為(5.32±1.06)%(P <0.01)。治療前2組 LVEF、LVEDD 和6MWT 比較差異無顯著性(P >0.05),治療後2組上述指標均顯著性升高(P <0.05和 P <0.01),但治療後上述指標在觀察組顯著高于對照組(P <0.05)。觀察組臨床治療有效率為90.0%顯著優于對照組的75.0%(P <0.05)。對照組和觀察組不良反應髮生率分彆為7.5%和10.0%,兩組之間比較差異無顯著性(P >0.05)。結論:G-CSF 可以高效動員 EPCs,有利于心梗患者心功能的恢複。
목적:관찰립세포집락자격인자(G-CSF)동원내피조세포(EPCs)대심기경사환자심공능적영향。방법:수집심기경사후심쇠환자80례,수궤분위상규치료대조조화립세포집락자격인자(G-CSF)동원치료관찰조,매조40례。 EPCs 사용류식세포의검측。결과:관찰조치료전환자 EPCs 비례위(0.11±0.04)%,치료후 EPCs 비례승고위(5.32±1.06)%(P <0.01)。치료전2조 LVEF、LVEDD 화6MWT 비교차이무현저성(P >0.05),치료후2조상술지표균현저성승고(P <0.05화 P <0.01),단치료후상술지표재관찰조현저고우대조조(P <0.05)。관찰조림상치료유효솔위90.0%현저우우대조조적75.0%(P <0.05)。대조조화관찰조불량반응발생솔분별위7.5%화10.0%,량조지간비교차이무현저성(P >0.05)。결론:G-CSF 가이고효동원 EPCs,유리우심경환자심공능적회복。
Objective To observe the effect of motivation of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on cardiac function in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). Methods Eighty MI patients were sellectedand then were divided into a conventional treatment group (n = 40) and a EPC motivation group (n = 40). EPCs were detected by flow cytometry. Results The rate of EPCs was increased from (0.11 ± 0.04)% in the baseline to (5.32 ± 1.06)% (P < 0.05). Before treatment, 6MWT, LVEF, and LVEDD did not differ significantly between the conventional treatment group and the EPC motivation group (P > 0.05); after treatment, 6MWT, LVEF, and LVEDD were significantly increased in both groups (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01). However, 6MWT, LVEF, and LVEDD were higher in the EPC motivation group than in the conventional treatment group (P <0.05). The clinical effectiveness rate was higher in the EPC motivation group than in the conventional treatment group (90.0% vs. 75.0%, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in adverse reactions (7.5%vs. 10.0%, P > 0.05). Conclusions G-CSF can markedly motivate EPCs, which is beneficial for improvement of cardiac function in MI patients.