农业科学与技术(英文版)
農業科學與技術(英文版)
농업과학여기술(영문판)
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
2014年
10期
1759-1763
,共5页
重金属污染%煤矿区废弃地%环境质量评价%广东明山煤矿
重金屬汙染%煤礦區廢棄地%環境質量評價%廣東明山煤礦
중금속오염%매광구폐기지%배경질량평개%엄동명산매광
Heavy metal pol ution%Wasteland of coalmine tailing%Environmental quality evaluation%Coalmine in Mingshan of Guangdong
为了科学评价广东省明山煤矿区废弃地土壤重金属污染情况,于2010年11月至2011年3月,采集明山煤矿区废弃地受重金属污染的5个样点的土壤样品,运用原子吸收分光光度法对土壤中7种重金属元素进行测定。结果表明,①土壤pH在2.87~6.16,土壤较贫瘠。②土壤污染主要是Cd、Mn污染,其中,Cd平均含量为2.052 mg/kg(0.759~3.109 mg/kg),超标严重;Mn 平均含量为421.215 mg/kg (387.057~488.660 mg/kg),污染严重。③从内梅罗综合污染指数看,样点1、样点4、样点5为极重污染,样点2、样点3为中度污染。
為瞭科學評價廣東省明山煤礦區廢棄地土壤重金屬汙染情況,于2010年11月至2011年3月,採集明山煤礦區廢棄地受重金屬汙染的5箇樣點的土壤樣品,運用原子吸收分光光度法對土壤中7種重金屬元素進行測定。結果錶明,①土壤pH在2.87~6.16,土壤較貧瘠。②土壤汙染主要是Cd、Mn汙染,其中,Cd平均含量為2.052 mg/kg(0.759~3.109 mg/kg),超標嚴重;Mn 平均含量為421.215 mg/kg (387.057~488.660 mg/kg),汙染嚴重。③從內梅囉綜閤汙染指數看,樣點1、樣點4、樣點5為極重汙染,樣點2、樣點3為中度汙染。
위료과학평개광동성명산매광구폐기지토양중금속오염정황,우2010년11월지2011년3월,채집명산매광구폐기지수중금속오염적5개양점적토양양품,운용원자흡수분광광도법대토양중7충중금속원소진행측정。결과표명,①토양pH재2.87~6.16,토양교빈척。②토양오염주요시Cd、Mn오염,기중,Cd평균함량위2.052 mg/kg(0.759~3.109 mg/kg),초표엄중;Mn 평균함량위421.215 mg/kg (387.057~488.660 mg/kg),오염엄중。③종내매라종합오염지수간,양점1、양점4、양점5위겁중오염,양점2、양점3위중도오염。
ln order to appraise scientifical y the heavy metal contamination in waste-land of coalmine tailing in Mingshan of Guangdong, the 5 soil samples in wasteland of coalmine tailing were col ected in November 2010 to March 2011. The 7 heavy metals content in the contaminated soil was measured by atomic absorption spec-trophotometry. The results showed the pH of the wasteland soil ranged from 2.87 to 6.16, and the soil was relatively infertile. The soil was mainly pol uted by Cd and Mn. The Cd content in wasteland soil ranged from 0.759 mg/kg to 3.109 mg/kg with an average content of 2.052 mg/kg, which was much higher than the standard content. The Mn content ranged from 387.057 to 488.660 mg/kg with an average content of 421.215 mg/kg, which was much higher than the standard content. The Nemerow integrated pol ution indexes showed the sample 1, sample 4 and sample 5 were of heavy pol ution, and sample 2 and sample 3 were of moderate pol ution.