浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版)
浙江師範大學學報(社會科學版)
절강사범대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG NORMAL UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCES)
2014年
5期
66-72
,共7页
范浚%心学%婺学%浙东学派
範浚%心學%婺學%浙東學派
범준%심학%무학%절동학파
Fan Jun%philosophy of the mind%the Wu Studies%the Eastern-Zhejiang School
范浚服膺思孟学派,又受家学与友朋的影响,思想颇具心学迹象。在范浚的思想中,“心”具有本体意味,同时主张性善论、“存心养性”的修养工夫,并秉持以“人心道德”为主轴的经史观。正是以心性之学为基础,范浚开展了事功经世与“王霸义利”的讨论,因而与陈亮、叶适的浙东事功学派有别,受到朱熹的高度赞赏。范浚在后世被追溯为“婺学开宗”,除了其自身的学术造诣外,还与明代章懋等金华士人重振婺学、自励励人的乡学建构密切相关。后来学者却不明此意,爰引相袭,遂成定论。
範浚服膺思孟學派,又受傢學與友朋的影響,思想頗具心學跡象。在範浚的思想中,“心”具有本體意味,同時主張性善論、“存心養性”的脩養工伕,併秉持以“人心道德”為主軸的經史觀。正是以心性之學為基礎,範浚開展瞭事功經世與“王霸義利”的討論,因而與陳亮、葉適的浙東事功學派有彆,受到硃熹的高度讚賞。範浚在後世被追溯為“婺學開宗”,除瞭其自身的學術造詣外,還與明代章懋等金華士人重振婺學、自勵勵人的鄉學建構密切相關。後來學者卻不明此意,爰引相襲,遂成定論。
범준복응사맹학파,우수가학여우붕적영향,사상파구심학적상。재범준적사상중,“심”구유본체의미,동시주장성선론、“존심양성”적수양공부,병병지이“인심도덕”위주축적경사관。정시이심성지학위기출,범준개전료사공경세여“왕패의리”적토론,인이여진량、협괄적절동사공학파유별,수도주희적고도찬상。범준재후세피추소위“무학개종”,제료기자신적학술조예외,환여명대장무등금화사인중진무학、자려려인적향학건구밀절상관。후래학자각불명차의,원인상습,수성정론。
Deeply convinced by the Simeng School and influenced by his family academic tradition as well as his friends, Fan Jun (1102-1150 ) develops a distinct philosophy of the mind in his thinking .Ad-dressing the “mind” in its ontological sense , Fan advocates the goodness of human nature as well as the ne-cessity of self-cultivation , and holds a moral-based point of view on literature and history .It is on the basis of such a heart-mind theory that he participates in the debates on pragmatism and on “reign and justice vs.he-gemony and profit”, and is admired by Zhu Xi (1130-1200 ) for his ideas that differ from those of the East-ern-Zhejiang Pragmatic School represented by Chen Liang (1143-1194) and Ye Shi (1150-1223).Fan is regarded posthumously as the “originator of the Wu School” not only because of his own academic achieve-ments but , more importantly , because of the rejuvenization of the Wu Studies by Zhang Mao ( 1436-1521 ) and other scholars from Jinhua during the Ming Dynasty ( 1368 -1644 ) .Later scholars , being ignorant of this, has been misunderstanding the whole thing based on incomplete records about it .