中国石油大学学报(自然科学版)
中國石油大學學報(自然科學版)
중국석유대학학보(자연과학판)
JOURNAL OF CHINA UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM(EDITION OF NATURAL SCIENCE)
2014年
5期
149-154
,共6页
冯洪庆%杨肖曦%王美英%刘道建
馮洪慶%楊肖晞%王美英%劉道建
풍홍경%양초희%왕미영%류도건
汽油机%可用能%直馏汽油%催化汽油%燃烧模型
汽油機%可用能%直餾汽油%催化汽油%燃燒模型
기유궤%가용능%직류기유%최화기유%연소모형
gasoline engine%availability%straight run gasoline%catalytic cracking gasoline%combustion model
根据调合燃油在汽油机燃烧过程中能量的转化规律,建立调合燃油组分模型及热力学准维双区模型,模拟研究直馏汽油和催化汽油在汽油机燃烧过程中缸内工质可用能及不可逆损失的变化规律。在调合燃油组分模型中,将异辛烷、正庚烷、甲基环己烷及甲苯作为直馏汽油的替代组分,将异辛烷、正庚烷、甲基环己烷、甲苯以及1-戊烯作为催化汽油的替代组分。结果表明:催化汽油的总可用能损失较低,约为36.01%,而直馏汽油的可用能损失较高,约为40.07%;在整个燃烧阶段,催化汽油的传热引起的可用能损失比直馏汽油的高,而燃料燃烧引起的可用能损失较低;可用能损失的大小与调合燃油组分组成的种类以及燃油组分组成的含量有关。
根據調閤燃油在汽油機燃燒過程中能量的轉化規律,建立調閤燃油組分模型及熱力學準維雙區模型,模擬研究直餾汽油和催化汽油在汽油機燃燒過程中缸內工質可用能及不可逆損失的變化規律。在調閤燃油組分模型中,將異辛烷、正庚烷、甲基環己烷及甲苯作為直餾汽油的替代組分,將異辛烷、正庚烷、甲基環己烷、甲苯以及1-戊烯作為催化汽油的替代組分。結果錶明:催化汽油的總可用能損失較低,約為36.01%,而直餾汽油的可用能損失較高,約為40.07%;在整箇燃燒階段,催化汽油的傳熱引起的可用能損失比直餾汽油的高,而燃料燃燒引起的可用能損失較低;可用能損失的大小與調閤燃油組分組成的種類以及燃油組分組成的含量有關。
근거조합연유재기유궤연소과정중능량적전화규률,건립조합연유조분모형급열역학준유쌍구모형,모의연구직류기유화최화기유재기유궤연소과정중항내공질가용능급불가역손실적변화규률。재조합연유조분모형중,장이신완、정경완、갑기배기완급갑분작위직류기유적체대조분,장이신완、정경완、갑기배기완、갑분이급1-무희작위최화기유적체대조분。결과표명:최화기유적총가용능손실교저,약위36.01%,이직류기유적가용능손실교고,약위40.07%;재정개연소계단,최화기유적전열인기적가용능손실비직류기유적고,이연료연소인기적가용능손실교저;가용능손실적대소여조합연유조분조성적충류이급연유조분조성적함량유관。
According to the transformation regularity of fuel energy in the gasoline engine combustion process with blended gasoline, the fuel blending component model and the thermodynamic quasi-dimensional two-zone model were established. The changes of availability and loss of irreversibility as a function of crank angle during the combustion process with straight run gasoline and catalytic cracking gasoline were studied by numerical simulation respectively. In the fuel blending compo-nent model, i-octane, n-heptane, methyl cyclohexane and toluene were treated as the substitute for straight run gasoline com-ponents, simultaneously, i-octane, n-heptane, methyl cyclohexane, toluene and 1- pentene as the substitute for catalytic cracking gasoline. The results show that the total exergy destruction of the catalytic cracking gasoline(36. 01%) was lower than that of the straight run gasoline(about 40. 07%). During the combustion process, the exergy destruction of the catalytic cracking gasoline due to heat transfer was larger than that of the straight run gasoline, while the exergy destruction due to combustion was smaller. The differences of the exergy destruction during the combustion process appear to be related to the kind and content of the hydrocarbon compositions in the blended gasoline.