江汉学术
江漢學術
강한학술
JiangHan Academic
2014年
5期
101-107
,共7页
同语%双重指称%语言哲学%客观主义%体验哲学%范式
同語%雙重指稱%語言哲學%客觀主義%體驗哲學%範式
동어%쌍중지칭%어언철학%객관주의%체험철학%범식
tautology%dual reference%philosophy of language%objectivism%embodiment%paradigm
指称问题在语言哲学中具有基础性和根本性地位,它所关注的基本问题是语词如何与对象相关。同语“N1 is N2”的 N2具有双重指称,它既可以指称其本身而获得字面意义,也可以指称以其自身作为原型成员的临时范畴,这就需要语言哲学的指称理论对其进行合理的解释,但以客观主义哲学为基础的描述指称论和历史因果指称论在解释双重指称现象方面力不从心。塞尔的意向性理论则是从客观主义哲学到体验哲学的过渡,在体验哲学的框架内,结合认知主体的体验和认知因素,可找到诠释同语双重指称的实现及其意指关系调整的复杂性和动态性的有效路径。研究表明,人类凭借自己的身体与世界互动,形成了各种原型范畴知识网络,原型和临时范畴的构建就是双重指称现象存在的经验基础。同时,人类具有随身而来,且经后天强化的转喻能力,这可以视为双重指称的实现和第二级意义调整的具身基础。
指稱問題在語言哲學中具有基礎性和根本性地位,它所關註的基本問題是語詞如何與對象相關。同語“N1 is N2”的 N2具有雙重指稱,它既可以指稱其本身而穫得字麵意義,也可以指稱以其自身作為原型成員的臨時範疇,這就需要語言哲學的指稱理論對其進行閤理的解釋,但以客觀主義哲學為基礎的描述指稱論和歷史因果指稱論在解釋雙重指稱現象方麵力不從心。塞爾的意嚮性理論則是從客觀主義哲學到體驗哲學的過渡,在體驗哲學的框架內,結閤認知主體的體驗和認知因素,可找到詮釋同語雙重指稱的實現及其意指關繫調整的複雜性和動態性的有效路徑。研究錶明,人類憑藉自己的身體與世界互動,形成瞭各種原型範疇知識網絡,原型和臨時範疇的構建就是雙重指稱現象存在的經驗基礎。同時,人類具有隨身而來,且經後天彊化的轉喻能力,這可以視為雙重指稱的實現和第二級意義調整的具身基礎。
지칭문제재어언철학중구유기출성화근본성지위,타소관주적기본문제시어사여하여대상상관。동어“N1 is N2”적 N2구유쌍중지칭,타기가이지칭기본신이획득자면의의,야가이지칭이기자신작위원형성원적림시범주,저취수요어언철학적지칭이론대기진행합리적해석,단이객관주의철학위기출적묘술지칭론화역사인과지칭론재해석쌍중지칭현상방면력불종심。새이적의향성이론칙시종객관주의철학도체험철학적과도,재체험철학적광가내,결합인지주체적체험화인지인소,가조도전석동어쌍중지칭적실현급기의지관계조정적복잡성화동태성적유효로경。연구표명,인류빙차자기적신체여세계호동,형성료각충원형범주지식망락,원형화림시범주적구건취시쌍중지칭현상존재적경험기출。동시,인류구유수신이래,차경후천강화적전유능력,저가이시위쌍중지칭적실현화제이급의의조정적구신기출。
The issue of the reference,which is concerned with how words relate to objects,occupies a fundamental position in the philosophy of language.In the constructions “N1 is N2”,N2 involves dual dereference,i.e.it can refer literally to itself on the one hand,and refers to an ad hoc category in which it is the prototype member of that category.This intriguing phenomenon requires an explanation from ref-erence theories.Description theory and historic-causal theory are inadequate in explaining the dual refer-ence phenomenon.With Searle’s intentional reference theory as a bridge,this paper then seeks a dy-namic and constructive explanation within the embodiment-based theories,attaching more importance to the subjects’bodily experience and cognitive factors.It is argued that the resolution of dual reference re-quires both embodied experience and metonymic ability:the former explains how people form prototype-based knowledge networks and construct ad hoc categories;the latter,a body-based ability,can explain the dynamic nature of how dual reference are realized.