重庆医学
重慶醫學
중경의학
CHONGQING MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
28期
3741-3743
,共3页
唾液酸类%复发%三阴性乳腺肿瘤
唾液痠類%複髮%三陰性乳腺腫瘤
타액산류%복발%삼음성유선종류
sialic acids%recurrence%triple negative breast cancer
目的:探讨唾液酸化 Lewis X(SLeX)表达对三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者肿瘤复发的影响。方法以符合条件的162例TNBC患者为研究对象。临床病理特点从病历获得,随访以电话随访为主,辅以住院随访、门诊随访。生存率估算应用 Kap-lan-Meier法,组间生存率曲线差异采用 Log-rank检验。结果26例(16.0%)SLeX阳性(阳性组),136例(84.0%)SLeX阴性(阴性组)。阳性组有较高的 pN分期。阳性组和阴性组的5年无复发生存(RFS)率分别为65.6%和85.8%,2组的RFS曲线存差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素分析表明 RFS率与年龄、pN分期、SLeX表达状态相关(P<0.05)。结论 SLeX阳性与三阴性乳腺癌患者复发有一定关系。
目的:探討唾液痠化 Lewis X(SLeX)錶達對三陰性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者腫瘤複髮的影響。方法以符閤條件的162例TNBC患者為研究對象。臨床病理特點從病歷穫得,隨訪以電話隨訪為主,輔以住院隨訪、門診隨訪。生存率估算應用 Kap-lan-Meier法,組間生存率麯線差異採用 Log-rank檢驗。結果26例(16.0%)SLeX暘性(暘性組),136例(84.0%)SLeX陰性(陰性組)。暘性組有較高的 pN分期。暘性組和陰性組的5年無複髮生存(RFS)率分彆為65.6%和85.8%,2組的RFS麯線存差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。多因素分析錶明 RFS率與年齡、pN分期、SLeX錶達狀態相關(P<0.05)。結論 SLeX暘性與三陰性乳腺癌患者複髮有一定關繫。
목적:탐토타액산화 Lewis X(SLeX)표체대삼음성유선암(TNBC)환자종류복발적영향。방법이부합조건적162례TNBC환자위연구대상。림상병리특점종병력획득,수방이전화수방위주,보이주원수방、문진수방。생존솔고산응용 Kap-lan-Meier법,조간생존솔곡선차이채용 Log-rank검험。결과26례(16.0%)SLeX양성(양성조),136례(84.0%)SLeX음성(음성조)。양성조유교고적 pN분기。양성조화음성조적5년무복발생존(RFS)솔분별위65.6%화85.8%,2조적RFS곡선존차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。다인소분석표명 RFS솔여년령、pN분기、SLeX표체상태상관(P<0.05)。결론 SLeX양성여삼음성유선암환자복발유일정관계。
Objective To explore the impact of sialyl Lewis X(SLeX)expression on tumor recurrence in patients with triple negative breast cancer(TNBC).Methods This study was a retrospective cohort study on 162 hospitalized TNBC patients meeting the conditions.Clinical and pathological characteristics were acquired from medical records.The main form of follow-up was tele-phone follow-up,supplemented by patient follow-up and out-patient follow-up.Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the sur-vival rate.The survival difference between the two groups was compared by the Log-rank test.Results A total of 2 6 patients (16.0%)were SLeX-positive(SLeX positive group)and 136 patients(84.0%)were SLeX-negative(SLeX negative group).SLeX positive group were more likely to present with advanced pathologic nodal stage.The 5-year RFS rate were 65.6% and 85.8% in SLeX positive group and SLeX negative group,respectively.RFS curves of the two groups were significantly different(P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that RFS was significantly associated with age,pN stage and SLeX expression status(P<0.05).Con-clusion SLeX positive expression is an independent risk factor for tumor relapse in patients with triple-negative breast cancer, which has a certain significance for further risk stratification and targeted therapy.